gymnasts: Performance of 40 gymnasts rated by eigth judges according to...

Description Usage Format Details Source References Examples

Description

A data frame containing the score performance of 40 gymnasts, 20 evaluated by eight judges using the old rulebook and 20 by the same judges using the new rulebook

Usage

1

Format

A data frame with 40 observations on the following 9 variables:

Rulebook

a factor with levels New and Old according to which rulebook was used.

Jude.1

a numeric vector with the ratings of the first judge.

Jude.2

a numeric vector with the ratings of the second judge.

Jude.3

a numeric vector with the ratings of the third judge.

Jude.4

a numeric vector with the ratings of the fourth judge.

Jude.5

a numeric vector with the ratings of the fifth judge.

Jude.6

a numeric vector with the ratings of the sixth judge.

Jude.7

a numeric vector with the ratings of the seventh judge.

Jude.8

a numeric vector with the ratings of the eighth judge.

Details

Assume that a new rulebook has been recently proposed and subsequently criticized. Consider a random sample of eight judges evaluating a random sample of 20 gymnasts with the old rulebook, and a different random sample of 20 gymnasts with the new rulebook.

Source

artificial data

References

Henriques, T., Antunes, L., Bernardes, J., Matias, M., Sato, D. and Costa-Santos, C. (2013) Information-based measure of disagreement for more than two observers: a useful tool to compare the degree of observer disagreement. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 13(1):47.

Examples

1

obs.agree documentation built on May 30, 2017, 4:42 a.m.