Compare_2D_3D | R Documentation |
Compare 2D vs 3D prioritization algorithms
Compare_2D_3D(biodiv_raster, depth_raster, breaks, biodiv_df, val_depth_range = TRUE,
priority_weights = NULL, budget_percents = seq(0,1,0.1), budget_weights = "equal",
penalty = 0, edge_factor = 0.5, gap = 0.1, threads = 1L, sep_priority_weights = ",",
portfolio = "gap", portfolio_opts = list(number_solutions = 10, pool_gap = 0.1),
sep_biodiv_df = ",", locked_in_raster = NULL, locked_out_raster = NULL, verbose = FALSE)
biodiv_raster |
SpatRaster object or folder path with 2D feature distributions as layers. |
depth_raster |
SpatRaster object or file path with elevation/bathymetric map. |
breaks |
Numeric vector defining the range of depth layers to use. |
biodiv_df |
|
val_depth_range |
No correction of the splitted 3D distributions based on depth range of the biodiversity
features ( |
priority_weights |
|
budget_percents |
Numeric value |
budget_weights |
Numeric weight vector for budget_percents allocation among depth levels.
Otherwise it can be a string with one of the choices |
penalty |
Numeric penalty applied to each depth zone, as defined in the |
edge_factor |
Numeric edge factor applied to each depth zone, as defined in the |
gap |
The optimality gap for the solver, as defined in the prioritizr package. The default gap is 0.1. |
threads |
The number of solver threads to be used. The default is 1. |
sep_priority_weights |
Separator used in priority_weights file, if priority_weights is in path format. |
portfolio |
The portfolio to be used, choosing between |
portfolio_opts |
The prioritizr portfolio options to be used. |
sep_biodiv_df |
Separator |
locked_in_raster |
An optional |
locked_out_raster |
An optional |
verbose |
If |
To facilitate comparisons between 3D and 2D approaches, the compare_2D_3D()
function is provided in the package. This function enables users to conduct all steps of
the analysis (data generation, setting and solving the optimization problem
and producing outputs), by executing both 2D and 3D approaches, with similar settings,
that facilitate comparisons. The function generates corresponding maps and graphs for
both approaches.
The split_rast
function is used to convert 2D distributions of
biodiversity features (rasters) into a 3D format.
Here the biodiv_df
can have the following
column names (independently of their order and any other names are ignored):
"species_name"
: Mandatory column with the feature names, which must
be the same with biodiv_raster.
"pelagic"
: Mandatory column about the features' behaviour.
TRUE
means that this feature is pelagic and FALSE
means that this feature is
benthic.
"min_z"
: Optional column about the minimum vertical range of
features. NA
values are translated as unlimited upward feature movement.
"max_z"
: Optional column about the maximum vertical range of
features. NA
values are translated as unlimited downward feature movement.
"group"
: Optional column with the group weights names.
Except from biodiv_df
, an additional data.frame
object can also be used for
defining group weights, named priority_weights
. If used, this data.frame
object must have two columns:
"group"
: Mandatory column with the group weights names.
"weight"
: Mandatory column with the group weights.
In case that no feature weights are desired, then priority_weights
can be kept
to NULL
.
breaks
must be in correspondence to depth_raster file.
For example, if depth_raster has range [10, -3000]
, then a breaks vector of
c(0,-40,-200,-2000,-Inf)
will create depth levels
[0,-40],\\(-40,-200], (-200, -2000], (-2000, -\infty)
and set to NA cells with values greater than 0
.
If val_depth_range = TRUE
(default), then no correction is done and the depth range
of the biodiversity features is derived from the corresponding feature distribution
raster and so "min_z"
and "max_z"
are ignored.
If val_depth_range = FALSE
, then the function uses the minimum and maximum depth
information provided in the biodiv_df, so as to remove feature occurrences outside their
expected range.
budget_percents
: Budget reflects the desired level of protection to be modeled.
It ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating no resources available for protection,
while 1 signifies resources sufficient to protect the entire study area. Typically,
setting a budget of 0.3 corresponds to the 30% conservation target (i.e. 30% of the
total area set aside for conservation).
Users also have the flexibility to define multiple budget levels using a vector,
allowing for the exploration of various protection scenarios. For instance, a vector like
c(0.1, 0.3, 0.5)
represents three scenarios where 10%, 30%, and 50% of the
study area are designated for protection.
budget_weights
: The Compare_2D_3D function allows users to specify how the
budget is distributed among depth levels. Three allocation methods are available:
Equal Distribution: Allocates an equal share of the budget to each depth level
(budget_weights = "equal"
).
Proportional to Area: Allocates budget based on the spatial extent of each depth
level
(budget_weights = "area"
).
Proportional to Species Richness: Prioritizes budget allocation to depth levels with
higher species diversity (number of species). (budget_weights = "richness"
)
Otherwise, it can be a numeric vector with length equal to the number of depth levels, where each number indicates the budget share per depth level.
The solver used for solving the prioritization problems is the best available on the computer, following the solver hierarchy of prioritizr.
A list containing the following objects (non-referenced are identical to the input ones):
split_features: output of split_rast
solution3D: list with 3D solution per budget percentage
absolute_held3D: absolute_held
for 3D solutions (see
evaluate_3D
)
overall_available3D: overall_available
for 3D solutions (see
evaluate_3D
)
overall_held3D: overall_held
for 3D solutions (see
evaluate_3D
)
relative_helds3D: relative_held
for 3D solutions (see
evaluate_3D
)
mean_overall_helds3D: base::mean
of overall_held
for 3D solution (see evaluate_3D
) per budget
sd_overall_helds3D: stats::sd
of overall_held
for 3D solution (see evaluate_3D
) per budget
depth_overall_available3D: depth_overall_available
for 3D
solutions (see evaluate_3D
)
solution2D: list with 2D solution per budget percentage
absolute_held2D: absolute_held
for 2D solutions (see
evaluate_3D
)
overall_available2D: overall_available
for 2D solutions (see
evaluate_3D
)
overall_held2D: overall_held
for 2D solutions (see
evaluate_3D
)
relative_helds2D: relative_held
for 2D solutions (see
evaluate_3D
)
mean_overall_helds2D: base::mean
of overall_held
for 2D solution (see evaluate_3D
) per budget
sd_overall_helds2D: stats::sd
of overall_held
for 2D solution (see evaluate_3D
) per budget
depth_overall_available2D: depth_overall_available
for 2D
solutions (see evaluate_3D
)
names_features: names of features used
total_amount: total_amount
of features used
(see evaluate_3D
)
overall_total_amount: overal_total_amount
of names of features
used (see evaluate_3D
)
jaccard_coef: terra_jaccard
per pair of 2D and 3D
solutions, given each budget
depth_levels_names: Depth levels names
biodiv_raster: biodiv_raster
used, after cleaning
biodiv_df: biodiv_df
used after cleaning
Hanson, Jeffrey O, Richard Schuster, Nina Morrell, Matthew Strimas-Mackey, Brandon P M Edwards, Matthew E Watts, Peter Arcese, Joseph Bennett, and Hugh P Possingham. 2024. prioritizr: Systematic Conservation Prioritization in R. https://prioritizr.net.
Lehtomäki, Joona (2016). Comparing prioritization methods, 21 June.
Available at:
https://rpubs.com/jlehtoma/priocomp
(Accessed 1 June 2024).
evaluate_3D,
terra_jaccard,
split_rast,
plot_Compare_2D_3D
## Not run:
## This example requires commercial solver from 'gurobi' package for
## portfolio = "gap". Else replace it with e.g. portfolio = "shuffle" for using
## a free solver like the one from 'highs' package.
biodiv_raster <- get_biodiv_raster()
depth_raster <- get_depth_raster()
data(biodiv_df)
out_2D_3D <- Compare_2D_3D(biodiv_raster = biodiv_raster,
depth_raster = depth_raster,
breaks = c(0, -40, -200, -2000, -Inf),
biodiv_df = biodiv_df,
budget_percents = seq(0, 1, 0.1),
budget_weights = "richness",
threads = parallel::detectCores(),
portfolio = "gap",
portfolio_opts = list(number_solutions = 10))
plot_Compare_2D_3D(out_2D_3D, to_plot = "all", add_lines=TRUE)
# Arbitrary random weights
priority_weights <- data.frame(c("A", "B", "C"), c(0.001, 1000, 1))
names(priority_weights) <- c("group", "weight")
biodiv_df$group <- rep(c("A", "B", "C"), length.out=20)
out_2D_3D <- Compare_2D_3D(biodiv_raster = biodiv_raster,
depth_raster = depth_raster,
breaks = c(0, -40, -200, -2000, -Inf),
biodiv_df = biodiv_df,
priority_weights = priority_weights,
budget_percents = seq(0, 1, 0.1),
budget_weights = "richness",
threads = parallel::detectCores(),
portfolio = "gap",
portfolio_opts = list(number_solutions = 10))
plot_Compare_2D_3D(out_2D_3D, to_plot = "all", add_lines=TRUE)
## End(Not run)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.