stroop: Stroop Dataset from Von Bastian et al. (2015)

Description Usage Format Details Source

Description

The dataset from on Von Bastian et al. (2015) on the Stroop task.

Usage

1

Format

A data.frame of 11245 rows and 7 columns

ID

Factor giving the participant ID: 1-121

congruency

Factor giving one of the two conditions: congruent and incongruent

rtMS

Numeric values of the response times in milliseconds

accuracy

Numeric values giving the accuracy of the response, here only 1 = correct

cond

Factor giving the condition: 1 = congruent, 2 = incongruent

trial

Numeric values indicating the trial number of the participant

rtS

Numeric values giving the response time in seconds

Details

In a Stroop task, average response times are compared across conditions. Participants get exposed to word stimuli and are instructed to indicate the font colour of the word. The word itself is also a colour word and is either congruent with the font colour or incongruent. For example, the stimulus word “red” in blue font would constitute the incongruent condition, whereas the word “red” in red font would constitute the congruent condition.

Source

Von Bastian, C. C., Souza, A. S., & Gade, M. (2016). No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(2), 246., retrieved from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/PerceptionCognitionLab/data0/master/contexteffects/FlankerStroopSimon/LEF_stroop.csv


quid documentation built on Dec. 9, 2021, 9:06 a.m.