#' Time course transcriptomic data from leaf and root tissues exposed to drought stress
#'
#' Time-course RNA-seq leaf and root data from "Transcriptomic analysis of field-droughted
#' sorghum from seedling to maturity reveals biotic and metabolic responses"
#'
#' @docType data
#' @name varoquaux2019leaf
#' @aliases varoquaux2019root
#' @usage data(varoquaux2019leaf)
#' data(varoquaux2019root)
#' @format A list with two related datasets: a gene expression data set (element
#' \code{data}) and corresponding meta data (element \code{meta}). The column
#' names of \code{data} correspond to the rownames of \code{meta}, linking the
#' samples together in the two datasets. See examples for accessing these two
#' data.frames.
#' @details This are two datasets from a mRNA-Seq time-course experiment,
#' measuring gene expression across time in the plant sorghum. One dataset
#' corresponds to the leaf of the plant (\code{varoquaux2019leaf}), the other
#' to the root from the same sets of plants (\code{varoquaux2019leaf}). Each
#' sample sequenced is actually a pool of at least 10 plants. Note that leaf
#' and root samples were processed and sequenced as two separate batches.
#' Any comparison between the two datasets should be traded with care.
#' @details \code{data} is a data frame with 34,211 rows corresponding to
#' sorghum genes with
#' (\href{https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html#!info?alias=Org_Sbicolor}{Phytozome
#' v3.0} gene ids). Root has 198 columns and leaf has 197 columns,
#' corresponding to samples. The root and leaf samples are from the same
#' plants, and have ids in the form of "0622162L05" or "0622162R05", with "L"
#' corresponding to the leaf and "R" corresponding to the root sample. Some
#' samples were removed for quality control reasons, resulting in slightly
#' different numbers of samples between the leaf and root.
#' @details The data provided is the raw data. Note that leafs and roots were
#' sequenced as two different batches.
#' @details \code{meta} is a data frame with rows corresponding to samples and
#' and columns with meta data. These columns are the same across leaf and
#' root, allowing for easy reuse of code across the datasets:
#' \describe{
#' \item{Barcode}{Barcode of the sample, same as row name}
#' \item{libraryName}{Internal Barcode given to the sample by the sequencing facility (JGI)}
#' \item{Block}{Plot from which the sample was taken}
#' \item{Week}{Numeric value corresponding to the week sample was taken}
#' \item{Replicate}{Each condition combination was replicated three times, but
#' not all replicates were sequenced. Each replicate came from a different
#' plot. The replicate id tracks this plot for each condition. However,
#' replicate 1 in one condition is a completely different plot from replicate 1 in another
#' condition, though the replicates were physically close to each other in the field. }
#' \item{Genotype}{Genotype (i.e. variety) of the sample, one of BT642 or RT430}
#' \item{Condition}{The drought condition, one of "Control" (regular
#' watering), "Postflowering" (drought applied post flowering of the plant),
#' or "Preflowering" (drought applied pre-flowering of the plant, and then
#' watering resumed after flowering)}
#' \item{Sample.type}{Either "Leaves" or "Root", only relevant if merging the two datasets}
#' \item{Day}{The day sample collected, in form of "Day14" (corresponding to Week 2)}
#' \item{Row}{Row plant was sampled from within the block}
#' \item{isFloweringWeek}{logical, indicating whether the week sampled
#' corresponding to the plant flowering}
#' \item{Date.Harvested}{The date sample was collected}
#' \item{Collection.Time}{The time of day plant was collected}
#' \item{No.plants.pooled}{The number of plants pooled for the sample}
#' \item{FloweringJulianDate}{The Julian date of flowering for the block the
#' sample was collected from}
#' \item{FloweringDate}{The date of flowering for the block the sample was collected from}
#' \item{FloweringWeek}{The week of flowering for the block the sample was collected from}
#' \item{FloweringDay}{The day of flowering for the block the sample was collected from}
#' \item{Unreplicated}{Identifies timepoints with no replicates}
#' \item{CompleteSampleTreatment}{Full set of factors (Genotype x Treatment x Week)}
#' }
#' The following variables are features measured at the end of planting when the
#' remaining plants from the plot were harvested:
#' \describe{
#' \item{LbsGrainHarvestPerPlot}{}
#' \item{TonsOfGrain.ac}{}
#' \item{PctGrainMoisture}{}
#' \item{TonsOfGrain.acAt13PctMoisture}{}
#' \item{X1000SeedWt_g}{}
#' \item{ApproximateEndOfSeasonStandCount_aveOfGrainRows}{}
#' \item{TotalFreshForageWtPerPlot_kg}{}
#' \item{TotalFreshForageWtPerPlot_lbs}{}
#' \item{TonsOfForage.ac}{}
#' \item{PctMoistureForage}{}
#' \item{TonsOfForage.acAt65PctMoisture}{}
#' \item{ApproximateEndOfSeasonStandCount_aveOfForageRows}{}
#' \item{DryBiomass}{}
#' \item{FreshBiomass}{}
#' \item{AveHeight}{}
#' }
#' The following variables are features regarding the quality of the mapping of
#' the sequences from the sample:
#' \describe{
#' \item{rawReads}{}
#' \item{filteredReads}{}
#' \item{sequencerType}{}
#' \item{runType}{}
#' \item{totalFragments}{}
#' \item{mappedFragments}{}
#' \item{assignedFragments}{}
#' \item{unassignedAmbiguous}{}
#' \item{unassignedNoFeatures}{}
#' \item{unassignedSecondaryHits}{}
#' \item{ratioStrandedness}{}
#' \item{MappedRatio}{}
#' \item{AssignedRatio}{}
#' \item{Plate}{}
#' \item{Location}{}
#' }
#' @keywords datasets
#'
#' @references Varoquaux et al, 2019
#' (\href{https://www.pnas.org/content/116/52/27124.short}{PNAS})
#'
#' @examples
#' data(varoquaux2019leaf)
#' dataLeaf = attr(varoquaux2019leaf, "data")
#' metaLeaf = attr(varoquaux2019leaf, "meta")
#' data(varoquaux2019root)
#' dataRoot = attr(varoquaux2019root, "data")
#' metaRoot = attr(varoquaux2019root, "meta")
"varoquaux2019leaf"
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.