fhes: The national forest health evaluation system

Description Usage Arguments Details Value Note Author(s) References See Also Examples

Description

Zhang & Lei (2014) proposed and developed a national forest health evaluation system at the forest stand level using analytic hierarchy process (AHP), has a high application value and practical significance.

Usage

1
2
3
4
5
6
fhes(c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7, c8, c9, c10, c11, c12, c13, c14,
c15, c16, c17, c18, c19, c20, c21, L_8 = 3.2, U_8 = 6.4,
L_15 = 30, U_15 = 60, L_16 = 0.8, U_16 = 1.3, O1_16 = 1.15,
O2_16 = 1.25, L_17 = 5, U_17 = 8.5, O1_17 = 6.5, O2_17 = 7,
L_18 = 10, U_18 = 80, L_19 = 1.49, U_19 = 13.19, L_20 = 5,
U_20 = 30, L_21 = 80, U_21 = 200)

Arguments

c1

Tree diversity index

c2

Shrub diversity index

c3

Herb diversity index

c4

Storey quantity

c5

Tree size diversity index

c6

Age structure

c7

Canopy closure

c8

Average volume increment per hectare

c9

Bio-disaster ratio

c10

Non bio-disaster ratio

c11

Crown length ratio

c12

Crown fade ratio

c13

Foliage falling ratio

c14

Regeneration density

c15

Soil depth

c16

Soil density

c17

Soil pH

c18

Soil organic matter

c19

Soil total nitrogen

c20

Soil available phosphorus

c21

Soil available potassium

L_8

Lower limit of Average volume increment per hectare

U_8

Upper limit of average volume increment per hectare

L_15

Lower limit of average volume increment per hectare

U_15

Upper limit of average volume increment per hectare

L_16

Lower limit of soil density

U_16

Upper limit of soil density

O1_16

Effective range of soil density

O2_16

Effective range of soil density

L_17

Lower limit of soil pH

U_17

Upper limit of soil pH

O1_17

Effective range of soil pH

O2_17

Effective range of soil pH

L_18

Lower limit of soil organic matter

U_18

Upper limit of soil organic matter

L_19

Lower limit of soil total nitrogen

U_19

Upper limit of soil total nitrogen

L_20

Lower limit of soil available phosphorus

U_20

Upper limit of soil available phosphorus

L_21

Lower limit of soil available potassium

U_21

Upper limit of soil available potassium

Details

None

Value

indexSystem

index system

legend

legend

index

index

coverted.Index

coverted.Index

weighted.Index

weighted.Index

unweighted.Criterion

unweighted.Criterion

weighted.Criterion

weighted.Criterion

evaluation

evaluation results

Note

None

Author(s)

Zongzheng Chai

References

Zhang HR, and Lei XD. 2014. Health management techniques for typical forest types. Beijing: Publishing house of forestry, China Chai ZZ.2016.National forest health evaluation system at the forest stand level in Chinahttp://www.forest-soil.net/Upload/ueditor/file/20160514/1463221795322480.pdf

See Also

None

Examples

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
##forest health evaluation for singel sample plot
tree.singlefhes<-fhes(c1=0.67,c2=1.89,c3=2.04,c4=4,c5=2.04,c6=1,c7=0.3,
               c8=3.4839,c9=0.75,c10=0.15,c11=0,c12=0.75,c13=0.35,
               c14=2500,c15=53,c16=1.56,c17=5.49,c18=34.03,c19=2.05,
               c20=21.38,c21=91.67)
tree.singlefhes

##Assigned the threshold of some variables, according to specific
##realistic condition or research contents
tree.spefhes<-fhes(c1=0.67,c2=1.89,c3=2.04,c4=4,c5=2.04,c6=1,c7=0.3,
               c8=3.4839,c9=0.75,c10=0.15,c11=0,c12=0.75,c13=0.35,
               c14=2500,c15=53,c16=1.56,c17=5.49,c18=34.03,c19=2.05,
               c20=21.38,c21=91.67,
               L_18=15,U_18=90,L_19=2,U_19=14,
               L_20=8,U_20=40,L_21=60,U_21=120)
tree.spefhes

##forest health evaluation for multiple sample plot
tree.multiplefhes<-fhes(c1=c(0.67,0,0.68),c2=c(1.89,1.33,1.79),c3=c(2.04,1.91,2.19),
               c4=c(4,3,4),c5=c(2.04,1.47,2.19),c6=c(1,0,1),c7=c(0.3,0.95,0.9),
               c8=c(3.4839,3.1579,5.9231),c9=c(0.75,0,0.3),c10=c(0.15,0,0.09),
               c11=c(0,0,0),c12=c(0.75,0.07,0.84),c13=c(0.35,0.11,0.84),
               c14=c(833.33,833.33,2500),c15=c(53,59,43),c16=c(1.28,1.56,1.33),
               c17=c(5.49,5.91,5.27),c18=c(38.32,34.03,25.37),c19=c(2.05,1.04,1.27),
               c20=c(21.38,34.66,14.19),c21=c(86.67,80,91.67))
tree.multiplefhes

##More regulare method of forest health evaluation for multiple sample plot
data(testIndex)
tree.fhes<-fhes(c1=testIndex$C1,c2=testIndex$C2,c3=testIndex$C3,c4=testIndex$C4,
     c5=testIndex$C5,c6=testIndex$C6,c7=testIndex$C7,c8=testIndex$C8,
     c9=testIndex$C9,c10=testIndex$C10,c11=testIndex$C11,c12=testIndex$C12,
    c13=testIndex$C13,c14=testIndex$C14,c15=testIndex$C15,c16=testIndex$C16,
    c17=testIndex$C17,c18=testIndex$C18,c19=testIndex$C19,c20=testIndex$C20,
    c21=testIndex$C21)
tree.fhes
pie(table(tree.fhes$evaluation$grade))

Zongzheng/forestHES documentation built on May 10, 2019, 1:59 a.m.