# knitr::knit_hooks$set(optipng = knitr::hook_optipng)
# knitr::opts_chunk$set(optipng = '-o7')

knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(fig.align = "center")
knitr::opts_chunk$set(fig.width = 12)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(fig.height = 6)

library(immunarch)
# source("../R/testing.R")
# immdata = load_test_data()
data(immdata)

Basic analysis

For each task in this section immunarch includes separate functions that are generally self-explanatory and are written in camel-case.

Note: all functions in immunarch require that the input immune repertoire data list have names. If you use the repLoad function, you will have no issues. If you compose your list by-hand, you must name elements in the list, e.g.:

your_data # Your list with repertoires without names

names(your_data)
# Output: NULL

names(your_data) <- sapply(1:length(your_data), function(i) paste0("Sample", i))
names(your_data)
# Output: Sample1 Sample2 ... Sample10

Basic analysis functions are:

How to visualise analysis results

Output of each analysis function could be passed directly to the vis function - the general function for visualisation. Examples of usage are written below. Almost all visualisations of analysis results are support grouping data by their respective properties from the metadata table or using user-supplied properties. Grouping is possible by passing either .by argument or by passing both .by and .meta arguments to the vis function.

1) You can pass .by as a character vector with one or several column names from the metadata table to group your data before plotting. In this case you should provide also the .meta argument with the metadata table.

exp_vol <- repExplore(immdata$data, .method = "volume")
p1 <- vis(exp_vol, .by = c("Status"), .meta = immdata$meta)
p2 <- vis(exp_vol, .by = c("Status", "Sex"), .meta = immdata$meta)
p1 + p2

2) You can pass .by as a character vector that exactly matches the number of samples in your data, each value should correspond to a sample's property. It will be used to group data based on the values provided. Note that in this case you should pass NA to .meta.

exp_vol <- repExplore(immdata$data, .method = "volume")
by_vec <- c("C", "C", "C", "C", "C", "C", "MS", "MS", "MS", "MS", "MS", "MS")
p <- vis(exp_vol, .by = by_vec)
p

If data is grouped, than statistical tests for comparing means of groups will be performed, unless .test = F is supplied. In case there are only two groups, the Wilcoxon rank sum test is performed (R function wilcox.test with an argument exact = F) for testing if there is a difference in mean rank values between two groups. In case there more than two groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test is performed (R function kruskal.test), that is equivalent to ANOVA for ranks and it tests whether samples from different groups originated from the same distribution. A significant Kruskal-Wallis test indicates that at least one sample stochastically dominates one other sample. Adjusted for multiple comparisons P-values are plotted on the top of groups. P-value adjusting is done using the Holm method (also known as Holm-Bonferroni correction). You can execute the command ?p.adjust in the R console to see more.

Plots generated by the vis function as well as any ggplot2-based plots can be passed to fixVis---built-in software tool for making publication-ready plots:

# 1. Analyse
exp_len <- repExplore(immdata$data, .method = "len", .col = "aa")

# 2. Visualise
p1 <- vis(exp_len)

# 3. Fix and make publication-ready results
fixVis(p1)

See the fixVis tutorial here.

Exploratory analysis

For the basic exploratory analysis such as comparing of number of reads / UMIs per repertoire or distribution use the function repExplore.

exp_len <- repExplore(immdata$data, .method = "len", .col = "aa")
exp_cnt <- repExplore(immdata$data, .method = "count")
exp_vol <- repExplore(immdata$data, .method = "volume")

p1 <- vis(exp_len)
p2 <- vis(exp_cnt)
p3 <- vis(exp_vol)

p1
p2 + p3
# You can group samples by their metainformation
p4 <- vis(exp_len, .by = "Status", .meta = immdata$meta)
p5 <- vis(exp_cnt, .by = "Sex", .meta = immdata$meta)
p6 <- vis(exp_vol, .by = c("Status", "Sex"), .meta = immdata$meta)

p4
p5 + p6

Clonality

One of the ways to estimate the diversity of samples is to evaluate clonality. repClonality measures the amount of the most or the least frequent clonotypes. There are several methods to assess clonality, let us take a view of them. The clonal.prop method computes the proportion of repertoire occupied by the pools of cell clones:

imm_pr <- repClonality(immdata$data, .method = "clonal.prop")
imm_pr

The top method considers the most abundant cell clonotypes:

imm_top <- repClonality(immdata$data, .method = "top", .head = c(10, 100, 1000, 3000, 10000))
imm_top

While the rare method deals with the least prolific clonotypes:

imm_rare <- repClonality(immdata$data, .method = "rare")
imm_rare

Finally, the homeo method assesses the clonal space homeostasis, i.e., the proportion of the repertoire occupied by the clones of a given size:

imm_hom <- repClonality(immdata$data,
  .method = "homeo",
  .clone.types = c(Small = .0001, Medium = .001, Large = .01, Hyperexpanded = 1)
)
imm_hom

vis(imm_top) + vis(imm_top, .by = "Status", .meta = immdata$meta)

vis(imm_rare) + vis(imm_rare, .by = "Status", .meta = immdata$meta)

vis(imm_hom) + vis(imm_hom, .by = c("Status", "Sex"), .meta = immdata$meta)


abrown435/immunarch-test documentation built on July 29, 2020, 12:04 a.m.