Description Usage Arguments Details Value References
Statistical model proposed by Mignan et al. (2017) that predicts the co-injection induced seismity rate via the linear relationship with flow rate and the post-injection rate via exponential decay.
1 | model_rate.val(window, theta, inj = NULL, shutin = NULL, t.postinj = NULL)
|
window |
the window to be used: " |
theta |
the list of model parameters:
|
inj |
the binned injection profile data frame with parameters
|
shutin |
the list of shut-in parameters
|
t.postinj |
the time vector for which a seismicity rate is predicted |
The linear relationship is in agreement with the literature (Dinske and Shapiro, 2013; Mignan, 2016; van der Elst et al., 2016). The exponential model was verified to perform best when tested on 6 stimulations (Mignan et al., 2017).
The binned injection profile is defined in the data.bin() function. The seismicity rate
is modelled for the same time vector as inj for the injection and uses t.postinj for post-injection.
A data frame of the modelled seismicity rate with parameters:
t the time (in decimal days)
rate the seismicity rate per bin
Dinske C., Shapiro S.A. (2013), Seismotectonic state of reservoirs inferred from magnitude distributions of fluid-induced seismicity. J. Seismol., 17, 13-25 doi: 10.1007/s10950-012-9292-9
Mignan A. (2016), Static behaviour of induced seismicity. Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 23, 107-113, doi: 10.5194/npg-23-107-2016
Mignan A., Broccardo M., Wiemer S., Giardini D. (2017), Induced seismicity closed-form traffic light system for actuarial decision-making during deep fluid injections. Sci. Rep., 7, 13607, doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13585-9
van der Elst N.J., Page M.T., Weiser D.A., Goebel T.H.W., Hosseini S.M. (2016), Induced earthquake magnitudes are as large as (statistically) expected. J. Geophys. Res., 121 (6), 4575-4590, doi: 10.1002/2016JB012818
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.