get_df | R Documentation |
Estimate or extract residual or model-based degrees of freedom from regression models.
get_df(x, ...)
## Default S3 method:
get_df(x, type = "residual", verbose = TRUE, ...)
x |
A statistical model. |
... |
Currently not used. |
type |
Type of approximation for the degrees of freedom. Can be one of the following:
Usually, when degrees of freedom are required to calculate p-values or
confidence intervals, |
verbose |
Toggle warnings. |
Degrees of freedom for mixed models
Inferential statistics (like p-values, confidence intervals and standard errors) may be biased in mixed models when the number of clusters is small (even if the sample size of level-1 units is high). In such cases it is recommended to approximate a more accurate number of degrees of freedom for such inferential statistics (see Li and Redden 2015).
m-l-1 degrees of freedom
The m-l-1 heuristic is an approach that uses a t-distribution with fewer
degrees of freedom. In particular for repeated measure designs (longitudinal
data analysis), the m-l-1 heuristic is likely to be more accurate than simply
using the residual or infinite degrees of freedom, because get_df(type = "ml1")
returns different degrees of freedom for within-cluster and between-cluster
effects. Note that the "m-l-1" heuristic is not applicable (or at least less
accurate) for complex multilevel designs, e.g. with cross-classified clusters.
In such cases, more accurate approaches like the Kenward-Roger approximation
is recommended. However, the "m-l-1" heuristic also applies to generalized
mixed models, while approaches like Kenward-Roger or Satterthwaite are limited
to linear mixed models only.
Between-within degrees of freedom
The Between-within denominator degrees of freedom approximation is, similar
to the "m-l-1" heuristic, recommended in particular for (generalized) linear
mixed models with repeated measurements (longitudinal design).
get_df(type = "betwithin")
implements a heuristic based on the between-within
approach, i.e. this type returns different degrees of freedom for within-cluster
and between-cluster effects. Note that this implementation does not return
exactly the same results as shown in Li and Redden 2015, but similar.
Satterthwaite and Kenward-Rogers degrees of freedom
Unlike simpler approximation heuristics like the "m-l-1" rule (type = "ml1"
),
the Satterthwaite or Kenward-Rogers approximation is also applicable in more
complex multilevel designs. However, the "m-l-1" or "between-within" heuristics
also apply to generalized mixed models, while approaches like Kenward-Roger
or Satterthwaite are limited to linear mixed models only.
Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 983-997.
Satterthwaite FE (1946) An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin 2 (6):110–4.
Elff, M.; Heisig, J.P.; Schaeffer, M.; Shikano, S. (2019). Multilevel Analysis with Few Clusters: Improving Likelihood-based Methods to Provide Unbiased Estimates and Accurate Inference, British Journal of Political Science.
Li, P., Redden, D. T. (2015). Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15(1), 38
model <- lm(Sepal.Length ~ Petal.Length * Species, data = iris)
get_df(model) # same as df.residual(model)
get_df(model, type = "model") # same as attr(logLik(model), "df")
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.