Description Usage Arguments Details Value References See Also Examples
DDM
estimates gravity models via double demeaning the
left hand side and right hand side of the gravity equation.
1 |
y |
name (type: character) of the dependent variable in the dataset
|
dist |
name (type: character) of the distance variable in the dataset
|
x |
vector of names (type: character) of those bilateral variables in
the dataset |
vce_robust |
robust (type: logic) determines whether a robust
variance-covariance matrix should be used. The default is set to |
data |
name of the dataset to be used (type: character).
To estimate gravity equations, a square gravity dataset including bilateral
flows defined by the argument |
... |
additional arguments to be passed to |
DDM
is an estimation method for gravity models presented
in Head and Mayer (2014) (see the references for more information).
To execute the function a square gravity dataset with all pairs of
countries, ISO-codes for the country of origin and destination, a measure of
distance between the bilateral partners as well as all
information that should be considered as dependent an independent
variables is needed.
Make sure the ISO-codes are of type "character".
Missing bilateral flows as well as incomplete rows should be
excluded from the dataset.
Furthermore, flows equal to zero should be excluded as the gravity equation
is estimated in its additive form.
Country specific effects are subdued due double demeaning.
Hence, unilateral income proxies such as GDP cannot be
considered as exogenous variables.
DDM
is designed to be consistent with the Stata code provided at
the website
Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and Cookbook
when choosing robust estimation.
As, to our knowledge at the moment, there is no explicit literature covering
the estimation of a gravity equation by DDM
using panel data,
we do not recommend to apply this method in this case.
The function returns the summary of the estimated gravity model as an
lm
-object.
For more information on Double Demeaning as well as information on gravity models, theoretical foundations and estimation methods in general see
Head, K. and Mayer, T. (2014) <DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3>
as well as
Anderson, J. E. (1979) <DOI:10.12691/wjssh-2-2-5>
Anderson, J. E. (2010) <DOI:10.3386/w16576>
Anderson, J. E. and van Wincoop, E. (2003) <DOI:10.3386/w8079>
Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2009) <DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.004>
Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2010) in Van Bergeijk, P. A., & Brakman, S. (Eds.) (2010) chapter 4 <DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9396.2011.01000.x>
Head, K., Mayer, T., & Ries, J. (2010) <DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.01.002>
Santos-Silva, J. M. C. and Tenreyro, S. (2006) <DOI:10.1162/rest.88.4.641>
and the citations therein.
See Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and Cookbook for gravity datasets and Stata code for estimating gravity models.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | ## Not run:
data(Gravity_no_zeros)
DDM(y="flow", dist="distw", x=c("rta"),
vce_robust=TRUE, data=Gravity_no_zeros)
DDM(y="flow", dist="distw", x=c("rta", "comcur", "contig"),
vce_robust=TRUE, data=Gravity_no_zeros)
## End(Not run)
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.