knitr::opts_chunk$set( collapse = TRUE, comment = "#>" ) library(mets)
We consider two while-alive estimands for recurrent events data \begin{align} \frac{E(N(D \wedge t))}{E(D \wedge t)} \end{align} and the mean of the subject specific events per time-unit \begin{align} E( \frac{N(D \wedge t)}{D \wedge t} ) \end{align} for two treatment-groups in the case of an RCT. For the laste mean of events per time-unit it has been seen that when the sample size is to great it can improve the finite sample properties to employ a transformation such as $\sqrt$ or cube-root, and thus consider \begin{align} E( (\frac{N(D \wedge t)}{D \wedge t})^.33 ) \end{align}
data(hfaction_cpx12) dtable(hfaction_cpx12,~status) dd <- WA_recurrent(Event(entry,time,status)~treatment+cluster(id),hfaction_cpx12,time=2,death.code=2) summary(dd) dd <- WA_recurrent(Event(entry,time,status)~treatment+cluster(id),hfaction_cpx12,time=2,death.code=2,trans=.333) summary(dd,type="log")
We see that the ratio of means are not very different, but that the subject specific mean of events per time-unit shows that those on the active treatment has fewer events per time-unit on average.
sessionInfo()
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.