OMEGA | R Documentation |
This function finds omega total, hierarchical, and subscale, as well as additional
model-based indices of interpretive relevance (H index, ECV, PUC)
from a Schmid-Leiman (SL) solution or lavaan single factor, second-order (see below),
or bifactor solution. The SL-based omegas can either be found from a
psych::schmid
, SL
, or,
in a more flexible way, by leaving
model = NULL
and specifying additional arguments. By setting the
type
argument, results from psych::omega
can be reproduced.
OMEGA( model = NULL, type = c("EFAtools", "psych"), g_name = "g", group_names = NULL, add_ind = TRUE, factor_corres = NULL, var_names = NULL, fac_names = NULL, g_load = NULL, s_load = NULL, u2 = NULL, cormat = NULL, pattern = NULL, Phi = NULL, variance = c("correlation", "sums_load") )
model |
class |
type |
character. Either |
g_name |
character. The name of the general factor from the lavaan solution.
This needs only be specified if |
group_names |
character. An optional vector of group names. The length
must correspond to the number of groups for which the |
add_ind |
logical. Whether additional indices (H index, ECV, PUC) should
be calculated or not (see details for these indices). If FALSE, only omegas
are returned. Default is |
factor_corres |
matrix. A logical matrix or a numeric matrix containing 0's and 1's that indicates which variable corresponds to which group factor. Must have the same dimensions as the matrix of group factor loadings from the SL solution. Cross-loadings are allowed here. See examples for use. |
var_names |
character. A vector with subtest names in the order
of the rows from the SL solution. This needs only be specified if |
fac_names |
character. An optional vector of group factor names in the
order of the columns of the SL solution. If left |
g_load |
numeric. A vector of general factor loadings from an SL solution.
This needs only be specified if |
s_load |
matrix. A matrix of group factor loadings from an SL solution.
This needs only be specified if |
u2 |
numeric. A vector of uniquenesses from an SL solution. This needs
only be specified if |
cormat |
matrix. A correlation matrix to be used when
|
pattern |
matrix. Pattern coefficients from an oblique factor solution.
This needs only be specified if |
Phi |
matrix. Factor intercorrelations from an oblique factor solution.
This needs only be specified if |
variance |
character. If |
## What this function does
This function calculates McDonald's omegas (McDonald, 1978, 1985, 1999), the H index (Hancock & Mueller, 2001), the explained common variance (ECV; Sijtsma, 2009), and the percent of uncontaminated correlations (PUC; Bonifay et al., 2015; Reise et al., 2013).
All types of omegas (total, hierarchical, and subscale) are calculated for the general factor as well as for the subscales / group factors (see, e.g., Gignac, 2014; Rodriguez et al., 2016a, 2016b). Omegas refer to the correlation between a factor and a unit-weighted composite score and thus the true score variance in a unit-weighted composite based on the respective indicators. Omega total is the total true score variance in a composite. Omega hierarchical is the true score variance in a composite that is attributable to the general factor, and omega subscale is the true score variance in a composite attributable to all subscales / group factors (for the whole scale) or to the specific subscale / group factor (for subscale composites).
The H index (also construct reliability or replicability index) is the correlation between an optimally-weighted composite score and a factor (Hancock & Mueller, 2001; Rodriguez et al., 2016a, 2016b). It, too, can be calculated for the whole scale / general factor as well as for the subscales / grouup factors. Low values indicate that a latent variable is not well defined by its indicators.
The ECV (Sijtsma, 2009, Rodriguez et al., 2016a, 2016b) is the ratio of the variance explained by the general factor and the variance explained by the general factor and the group factors.
The PUC (Bonifay et al., 2015; Reise et al., 2013, Rodriguez et al., 2016a, 2016b) refers to the proportion of correlations in the underlying correlation matrix that is not contaminated by variance of both the general factor and the group factors (i.e., correlations between indicators from different group factors, which reflect only general factor variance). The higher the PUC, the more similar a general factor from a multidimensional model will be to the single factor from a unidimensional model.
## How to use this function
If model
is a lavaan
second-order or bifactor solution,
only the name of the general factor from the lavaan model needs to be specified
additionally with the g_name
argument. It is then determined whether this
general factor is a second-order factor (second-order model with one second-order
factor assumed) or a breadth factor (bifactor model assumed). Please note that
this function only works for second-order models if they contain no more than
one second-order factor. In case of a second-order solution, a
Schmid-Leiman transformation is performed on the first- and second-order loadings
and omega coefficents are obtained from the transformed (orthogonalized) solution
(see SL
for more information on Schmid-Leiman transformation).
There is also the possibility to enter a lavaan
single factor solution.
In this case, g_name
is not needed. Finally, if a solution from a
lavaan
multiple group analysis is entered, the indices are computed for
each group.
The type argument is not evaluated if model
is of class
lavaan
.
If model
is of class SL
or
psych::schmid
only the
type
and, depending on the type (see below), the factor_corres
arguments need to be specified additionally. If model is of class
psych::schmid
and variance = "correlation"
(default), it is
recommended to also provide the original correlation matrix in cormat
to get more accurate results. Otherwise, the correlation matrix will be found
based on the pattern matrix and Phi from the
psych::schmid
output
using the psych::factor.model
function.
If model = NULL
, the arguments type
, factor_corres
(depending on the type, see below), var_names
, g_load
, s_load
,
and u2
and either cormat
(recommended) or Phi
and
pattern
need to be specified. If Phi
and pattern
are
specified instead of cormat
, the correlation matrix is found using
the psych::factor.model
function.
The only difference between type = "EFAtools"
and type = "psych"
is the determination of variable-to-factor correspondences. type = "psych"
reproduces the psych::omega
results, where
variable-to-factor correspondences are found by taking the highest
group factor loading for each variable as the relevant group factor loading.
To do this, factor_corres
must be left NULL
.
The calculation of the total variance (for the whole scale as well as the
subscale composites) can also be controlled in this function using the
variance
argument. For both types—"EFAtools"
and "psych"
—variance
is set to "correlation"
by default, which means that
total variances are found using the correlation matrix. If
variance = "sums_load"
the total variance is calculated using the
squared sums of general loadings and group factor loadings and the sum of the
uniquenesses. This will only get comparable results to
variance = "correlation"
if no cross-loadings are present and simple
structure is well-achieved in general with the SL solution (i.e., the
uniquenesses should capture almost all of the variance not explained by the
general factor and the variable's allocated group factor).
If found for an SL or lavaan
second-order of bifactor solution
without multiple groups:
A matrix with omegas for the whole scale and for the subscales and (only if
add_ind = TRUE
) with the H index, ECV, and PUC.
tot |
Omega total. |
hier |
Omega hierarchical. |
sub |
Omega subscale. |
H |
H index. |
ECV |
Explained common variance. |
PUC |
Percent of uncontaminated correlations. |
If found for a lavaan
single factor solution without multiple groups:
A (named) vector with omega total and (if add_ind = TRUE
) the H index
for the single factor.
If found for a lavaan
output from a multiple group analysis: A list
containing the output described above for each group.
McDonald, R. P. (1978). Generalizability in factorable domains: ‘‘Domain validity and generalizability’’. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 75–79.
McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016a). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 223-237.
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016b). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21, 137-150.
Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.
Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 5–26.
Bonifay, W. E., Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., & Meijer, R. R. (2015). When are multidimensional data unidimensional enough for structural equation modeling?: An evaluation of the DETECT multidimensionality index. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 504—516.
Gignac, G. E. (2014). On the Inappropriateness of Using Items to Calculate Total Scale Score Reliability via Coefficient Alpha for Multidimensional Scales. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 130-139.
## Use with lavaan outputs # Create and fit bifactor model in lavaan (assume all variables have SDs of 1) mod <- 'F1 =~ V1 + V2 + V3 + V4 + V5 + V6 F2 =~ V7 + V8 + V9 + V10 + V11 + V12 F3 =~ V13 + V14 + V15 + V16 + V17 + V18 g =~ V1 + V2 + V3 + V4 + V5 + V6 + V7 + V8 + V9 + V10 + V11 + V12 + V13 + V14 + V15 + V16 + V17 + V18' fit_bi <- lavaan::cfa(mod, sample.cov = test_models$baseline$cormat, sample.nobs = 500, estimator = "ml", orthogonal = TRUE) # Compute omegas and additional indices for bifactor solution OMEGA(fit_bi, g_name = "g") # Compute only omegas OMEGA(fit_bi, g_name = "g", add_ind = FALSE) # Create and fit second-order model in lavaan (assume all variables have SDs of 1) mod <- 'F1 =~ V1 + V2 + V3 + V4 + V5 + V6 F2 =~ V7 + V8 + V9 + V10 + V11 + V12 F3 =~ V13 + V14 + V15 + V16 + V17 + V18 g =~ F1 + F2 + F3' fit_ho <- lavaan::cfa(mod, sample.cov = test_models$baseline$cormat, sample.nobs = 500, estimator = "ml") # Compute omegas and additional indices for second-order solution OMEGA(fit_ho, g_name = "g") ## Use with an output from the SL function, with type EFAtools efa_mod <- EFA(test_models$baseline$cormat, N = 500, n_factors = 3, type = "EFAtools", method = "PAF", rotation = "promax") sl_mod <- SL(efa_mod, type = "EFAtools", method = "PAF") # Two examples how to specify the indicator-to-factor correspondences: # Based on a specific salience threshold for the loadings (here: .20): factor_corres_1 <- sl_mod$sl[, c("F1", "F2", "F3")] >= .2 # Or more flexibly (could also be TRUE and FALSE instead of 0 and 1): factor_corres_2 <- matrix(c(rep(0, 12), rep(1, 6), rep(0, 6), rep(1, 6), rep(0, 6), rep(1, 6), rep(0, 12)), ncol = 3, byrow = FALSE) OMEGA(sl_mod, type = "EFAtools", factor_corres = factor_corres_1) ## Use with an output from the psych::schmid function, with type psych for ## OMEGA schmid_mod <- psych::schmid(test_models$baseline$cormat, nfactors = 3, n.obs = 500, fm = "pa", rotate = "Promax") # Find correlation matrix from phi and pattern matrix from psych::schmid output OMEGA(schmid_mod, type = "psych") # Use specified correlation matrix OMEGA(schmid_mod, type = "psych", cormat = test_models$baseline$cormat) ## Manually specify components (useful if omegas should be computed for a SL ## or bifactor solution found with another program) ## As an example, we extract the elements from an SL output here. This gives ## the same results as in the second example above. efa_mod <- EFA(test_models$baseline$cormat, N = 500, n_factors = 3, type = "EFAtools", method = "PAF", rotation = "promax") sl_mod <- SL(efa_mod, type = "EFAtools", method = "PAF") factor_corres <- matrix(c(rep(0, 12), rep(1, 6), rep(0, 6), rep(1, 6), rep(0, 6), rep(1, 6), rep(0, 12)), ncol = 3, byrow = FALSE) OMEGA(model = NULL, type = "EFAtools", var_names = rownames(sl_mod$sl), g_load = sl_mod$sl[, "g"], s_load = sl_mod$sl[, c("F1", "F2", "F3")], u2 = sl_mod$sl[, "u2"], cormat = test_models$baseline$cormat, factor_corres = factor_corres)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.