Description Usage Arguments Details Value
Test auto-correlation in observed and predicted flow intermittence class among gauging stations using a "join count test" for each HydroBASINS level 3.
1 | test_joincount(in_gauges)
|
in_gauges |
data.table of gauging stations data, including reference and predicted flow intermittence, hydrobasin membership, and WGS84 coordinates. Formatted internally in map_basinBACC. |
For each river basin that included both IRES and perennial stations and contained at least 20 gauging stations, we tested whether spatial predictions of intermittence differed further from a random spatial distribution than the observed patterns. We did so in the following steps:
We measured the degree of clustering separately for the observed and predicted flow intermittence class of gauging stations — by computing the join-count statistics (Cliff & Ord, 1981) based on four nearest neighbors (see Salima & de Bellefon, 2018 for an example implementation).
We assessed whether the predicted spatial distribution of intermittence differed more from what would be expected by chance (i.e., a random distribution) than the observed distribution. This assessment was based on the standard score between the estimated join-count statistics and the joincount statistics that would be obtained based on a random spatial distribution of flow intermittence classes among the stations, using 1000 permutations.
The join-count statistics and permutations were computed with the spatial-cross validation predictions, using the joincount.mc function from the spdep package (Bivand et al., 2009).
data.table with the p-value and standard deviate of the join count test for reference and predicted flow intermittence at gauging stations in each HydroBASINS level 3.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.