lmomgep | R Documentation |
This function estimates the L-moments of the Generalized Exponential Poisson (GEP) distribution given the parameters (\beta
, \kappa
, and h
) from pargep
. The L-moments in terms of the parameters are best expressed in terms of the expectations of order statistic maxima \mathrm{E}[X_{n:n}]
for the distribution. The fundamental relation is
\lambda_r = \sum_{k=1}^r (-1)^{r-k}k^{-1}{r-1 \choose k-1}{r+k-2 \choose k-1}\mathrm{E}[X_{k:k}]\mbox{.}
The L-moments do not seem to have been studied for the GEP. The challenge is the solution to \mathrm{E}[X_{n:n}]
through an expression by Barreto-Souza and Cribari-Neto (2009) that is
\mathrm{E}[X_{n:n}] = \frac{\beta\,h\,\Gamma(\kappa+1)\,\Gamma(n\kappa + 1)}{n\,\Gamma(n)\,(1 - \exp(-h))^{n\kappa}}\sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^j\exp(-h(j+1))}{\Gamma(n\kappa - j)\,\Gamma(j+1)}\;F^{12}_{22}(h(j+1))\mbox{,}
where F^{12}_{22}(h(j+1))
is the Barnes Extended Hypergeometric function with arguments reflecting those needed for the GEP (see comments under BEhypergeo
).
lmomgep(para, byqua=TRUE)
para |
The parameters of the distribution. |
byqua |
A logical triggering the |
The mathematics (not of L-moments but \mathrm{E}[X_{n:n}]
) shown by Barreto-Souza and Cribari-Neto (2009) are correct but are apparently subject to considerable numerical issues even with substantial use of logarithms and exponentiation in favor of multiplication and division in the above formula for \mathrm{E}[X_{n:n}]
. Testing indicates that numerical performance is better if the non-j
-dependent terms in the infinite sum remain inside it. Testing also indicates that the edges of performance can be readily hit with large \kappa
and less so with large h
. It actually seems superior to not use the above equation for L-moment computation based on \mathrm{E}[X_{n:n}]
but instead rely on expectations of maxima order statistics (expect.max.ostat
) from numerical integration of the quantile function (quagep
) as is implementated in theoLmoms.max.ostat
. This is the reason that the byqua
argument is available and set to the shown default. Because the GEP is experimental, this function provides two approaches for \lambda_r
computation for research purposes.
An R list
is returned.
lambdas |
Vector of the L-moments. First element is
|
ratios |
Vector of the L-moment ratios. Second element is
|
trim |
Level of symmetrical trimming used in the computation, which is |
leftrim |
Level of left-tail trimming used in the computation, which is |
rightrim |
Level of right-tail trimming used in the computation, which is |
source |
An attribute identifying the computational source of the L-moments: “lmomgep”. |
W.H. Asquith
Barreto-Souza, W., and Cribari-Neto, F., 2009, A generalization of the exponential-Poisson distribution: Statistics and Probability, 79, pp. 2493–2500.
pargep
, cdfgep
, pdfgep
, quagep
## Not run:
gep <- vec2par(c(2, 1.5, 3), type="gep")
lmrA <- lmomgep(gep, byqua=TRUE); print(lmrA)
lmrB <- lmomgep(gep, byqua=FALSE); print(lmrB)
# Because the L-moments of the Generalized Exponential Poisson are computed
# strictly from the expectations of the order statistic extrema, lets us evaluate
# by theoretical integration of the quantile function and simulation:
set.seed(10); gep <- vec2par(c(2, 1.5, 3), type="gep")
lmr <- lmomgep(gep, byqua=FALSE)
E33a <- (lmr$lambdas[3] + 3*lmr$lambdas[2] + 2*lmr$lambdas[1])/2 # 2.130797
E33b <- expect.max.ostat(3, para=gep, qua=quagep) # 2.137250
E33c <- mean(replicate(20000, max(quagep(runif(3), gep)))) # 2.140226
# See how the E[X_{3:3}] by the formula shown in this documentation results in
# a value that is about 0.007 too small. Now this might now seem large but it
# is a difference. Try gep <- list(para=c(2, 1.5, 13), type="gep") or
# gep <- list(para=c(2, .08, 21), type="gep"), which fails on byqua=TRUE
## End(Not run)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.