Nothing
#' FindIt: Finding Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
#'
#' \tabular{ll}{ Package: \tab factorEx\cr Type: \tab Package\cr Version: \tab 1.1.5\cr
#' Date: \tab 2019-11-19\cr}
#'
#' @name FindIt-package
#' @aliases FindIt-package CreateWeights CreatelevelIndex lengthSlack Lcombinefunction
#' PsyConstraintCombine CreateWeights CreateANOVAconst Zcombinefunction Glsei
#' CoefExtract rangeCausalANOVAFit CausalANOVAFit stab.CausalANOVA ScreenINT
#' glinternet.cv indTwo2Three NoRegularization Collapsing FullVCOV
#' cluster_se_glm makeallway maketwoway
#' @docType package
#' @author Naoki Egami, Marc Ratkovic and Kosuke Imai.
#'
#' Maintainer: Naoki Egami \email{negami@princeton.edu}
#' @references Imai, Kosuke and Marc Ratkovic. 2013. ``Estimating Treatment
#' Effect Heterogeneity in Randomized Program Evaluation.'' Annals of Applied
#' Statistics, Vol.7, No.1(March), pp. 443-470.
#' \url{http://imai.fas.harvard.edu/research/files/svm.pdf}
#'
#' Egami, Naoki and Kosuke Imai. 2019. Causal Interaction in Factorial Experiments: Application to Conjoint Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association,
#' Vol.114, No.526 (June), pp. 529–540. \url{http://imai.fas.harvard.edu/research/files/int.pdf}
#' @keywords package
NULL
#' Data from conjoint analysis in Carlson (2015).
#'
#' This data set gives the outcomes a well as treatment assignments of the
#' conjoint analysis in Carlson (2015). Please Carlson (2015) and Egami and
#' Imai (2019) for more details.
#'
#'
#' @name Carlson
#' @docType data
#' @format A data frame consisting of 7 columns (including a treatment
#' assignment vector) and 3232 observations.
#'
#' \tabular{llll}{ outcome \tab integer \tab whether a profile is chosen \tab
#' 0,1 \cr newRecordF \tab factor \tab record as a politician \tab 7 levels \cr
#' promise \tab factor \tab platform \tab 3 levels (job, clinic, education) \cr
#' coeth_voting \tab factor \tab whether a profile is coethnic to a respodent
#' \tab Yes, No \cr Degree \tab factor \tab job whether a profile has relevant
#' degrees \tab 4 Yes, No \cr }
#' @references Carlson, E. 2015. ``Ethnic voting and accountability in africa:
#' A choice experiment in uganda.'' World Politics 67, 02, 353--385.
#' @source Data from Carlson (2015).
#' @keywords datasets
NULL
#' Data from the 1998 New Haven Get-Out-the-Vote Experiment
#'
#' This data set contains the most recent corrected data from the field
#' experiment analyzed in Gerber and Green (2000).
#'
#'
#' @name GerberGreen
#' @docType data
#' @format A data frame consisting of 9 columns and 29,380 observations.
#'
#' \tabular{llll}{ voted98 \tab integer \tab voted in 1998 \tab 0,1 \cr
#' persngrp \tab factor \tab personal contact attempted \tab 0,1 \cr phnscrpt
#' \tab factor \tab script read to phone respondents \tab 7 levels \cr mailings
#' \tab factor \tab number of mailings sent \tab 0 - 3 \cr appeal \tab factor
#' \tab content of message \tab 3 levels \cr age \tab integer \tab age of
#' respondent \tab \cr majorpty \tab factor \tab Democratic or Republican \tab
#' \cr voted96.1 \tab factor \tab voted in 1996 \tab 0,1 \cr voted96.0 \tab
#' factor \tab abstained in 1996 \tab 0,1 \cr }
#'
#' Note: The levels of phnscrpt and appeal are follows.
#'
#' phnscrpt: Script read to phone respondents \tabular{ll}{ 0 \tab No phone \cr
#' 1 \tab Civic-Blood \cr 2 \tab Civic \cr 3 \tab Civic or Blood-Civic \cr 4
#' \tab Neighbor \cr 5 \tab Neighbor or Civic-Neighbor \cr 6 \tab Close }
#'
#' appeal: Content of message \tabular{ll}{ 1 \tab Civic Duty \cr 2 \tab
#' Neighborhood Solidarity \cr 3 \tab Close Election }
#' @references Gerber, A. S. and Green, D. P. 2000 . ``The effects of
#' canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field
#' experiment.'' American Political Science Review, Vol.94, No.3, pp. 653-663.
#'
#' Imai, K. 2005 . ``Do get-out-the-vote calls reduce turnout?: The importance
#' of statistical methods for field experiments."" American Political Science
#' Review, Vol.99, No.2, pp. 283-300.
#' @keywords datasets
NULL
#' National Supported Work Study Experimental Data
#'
#' This data set gives the outcomes a well as treatment assignments and
#' covariates for the National Supported Work Study, as analyzed in LaLonde
#' (1986).
#'
#'
#' @name LaLonde
#' @docType data
#' @format A data frame consisting of 12 columns (including a treatment
#' assignment vector) and 2787 observations.
#'
#' \tabular{llll}{ outcome \tab integer \tab whether earnings in 1978 are
#' larger than in 1975 \tab 0,1 \cr treat \tab integer \tab whether the
#' individual received the treatment \tab 0,1 \cr age \tab numeric \tab age in
#' years \tab \cr educ \tab numeric \tab education in years \tab \cr black \tab
#' factor \tab black or not \tab 0,1 \cr hisp \tab factor \tab hispanic or not
#' \tab 0,1 \cr white \tab factor \tab white or not \tab 0,1 \cr marr \tab
#' factor \tab married or not \tab 0,1 \cr nodegr \tab factor \tab an indicator
#' for no high school degree \tab 0,1 \cr log.re75 \tab numeric \tab log of
#' earnings in 1975 \tab \cr u75 \tab factor \tab unemployed in 1975 \tab 0,1
#' \cr wts.extrap \tab numeric \tab extrapolation weights to the 1978 Panel
#' Study for Income Dynamics dataset \tab }
#' @references LaLonde, R.J. 1986. ``Evaluating the econometric evaulations of
#' training programs with experimental data."" American Economic Review,
#' Vol.76, No.4, pp. 604-620.
#' @source Data from the National Supported Work Study. A benchmark matching
#' dataset. 1975 earnings are pre-treatment.
#' @keywords datasets
NULL
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.