FutRuleExample1: Simulation-based selection of an optimal futility stopping...

FutRuleExample1R Documentation

Simulation-based selection of an optimal futility stopping rule (normally distributed endpoint)

Description

Consider a multi-arm Phase II or Phase III trial with a single interim analysis and assume that the primary efficacy endpoint is normally distributed and a larger value indicates to a more favorable outcome. A futility assessment will be performed for each treatment arm at this interim look using the predicted probability of success (conditional power). A treatment arm will be dropped at this decision point if conditional power is below a pre-defined threshold. An optimal value of this futility threshold can be found by computing the sensitivity and specificity rates associated with the futility stopping rule and then identifying the threshold that simultaneously maximizes both rates.

The following design parameters will be assumed in the trial:

  • Two treatments (two doses of an experimental treatment) will be compared to a control in this trial and a balanced design with 100 enrolled patients per trial arm will be utilized.

  • The patient dropout rate at the end of the treatment period is assumed to be 5%.

  • The information fraction at the interim analysis is 50%.

The calculations will be performed under the following set of treatment effect assumptions:

  • The mean and standard deviation of the primary efficacy endpoint in the control arm are set to 0 and 1, respectively.

  • The mean values in the two treatment arms are assumed to be equal to 0.25 and 0.3 with a common standard deviation of 1.

Operating characteristics of the futility stopping rule such as the sensitivity and specificity rates as well as an optimal futility threshold will be computed using the FutRule function based on 1,000 simulation runs. A list of all trial design parameters (parameters) needs to be set up as shown below and passed to this function. A detailed simulation report can be generated using the GenerateReport function and a graphical user interface can be launched by calling the FutRuleApp function.

Arguments

No arguments

Value

No return value

See Also

FutRule, FutRuleExample2, FutRuleExample3

Examples

# List of all parameters
parameters = list()

# Endpoint type
parameters$endpoint_type = "Normal"

# Number of enrolled patients (control, two treatments)
parameters$sample_size = c(100, 100, 100)

# Direction of favorable outcome
parameters$direction = "Higher"

# Patient dropout rate
parameters$dropout_rate = 0.05

# Mean and SD in the control arm 
parameters$control_mean = 0
parameters$control_sd = 1

# Means and SDs in the treatment arms 
parameters$treatment_mean = c(0.25, 0.30)
parameters$treatment_sd = c(1, 1)

# Information fraction
parameters$info_frac = 0.5

# One-sided alpha level
parameters$alpha = 0.025

# Number of simulations, you should prefer more
parameters$nsims = 100

# Number of cores for parallel calculations
parameters$ncores = 1

# Remove this parameter in your code:
parameters$withoutCharts = TRUE

# Run simulations to compute characteristics of the futility stopping rule
results = FutRule(parameters)

# Generate a simulation report (remove tempfile)
GenerateReport(results, 
              tempfile("FutRule Normally distributed endpoint.docx", fileext=".docx"))

MedianaDesigner documentation built on Aug. 28, 2023, 9:06 a.m.