Nothing
#' A Simulated RDS Data Set
#' @description This is a faux set used to demonstrate RDS functions and analysis.
#' It is used is some simple examples and has categorical variables "X", "Y" and "Z".
#' @docType data
#' @keywords datasets
#' @format An rds.data.frame object
#' @references Gile, Krista J., Handcock, Mark S., 2010 \emph{Respondent-driven Sampling: An Assessment of Current Methodology}, \emph{Sociological Methodology}, 40, 285-327.
#' @seealso \code{\link{fauxsycamore}}, \code{\link{fauxmadrona}}
#' @examples
#' data(faux)
#' RDS.I.estimates(rds.data=faux,outcome.variable='X')
#' @name faux
NULL
#' A Simulated RDS Data Set
#' @description This is a faux set used to demonstrate RDS functions and analysis.
#' @docType data
#' @keywords datasets
#' @format An rds.data.frame object
#' @references Gile, Krista J., Handcock, Mark S., 2010 \emph{Respondent-driven Sampling: An Assessment of Current Methodology}, \emph{Sociological Methodology}, 40, 285-327.
#' @seealso \code{\link{fauxsycamore}}, \code{\link{fauxmadrona}}
#' @name fauxtime
NULL
#' A Simulated RDS Data Set with no seed dependency
#'
#' This is a faux set used to illustrate how the estimators perform under
#' different populations and RDS schemes.
#'
#' The population had N=1000 nodes. In this case, the sample size is 500 so
#' that there is a relatively small sample fraction (50\%). There is homophily
#' on disease status (R=5) and there is differential activity by disease status
#' whereby the infected nodes have mean degree twice that of the uninfected
#' (w=1.8).
#'
#' In the sampling, the seeds are chosen randomly from the full population, so
#' there is no dependency induced by seed selection.
#'
#' Each sample member is given 2 uniquely identified coupons to distribute to
#' other members of the target population in their acquaintance. Further each
#' respondent distributes their coupons completely at random from among those
#' they are connected to.
#'
#'
#'
#' Here are the results for this data set and the sister \code{fauxsycamore}
#' data set:
#'
#' \tabular{rlllllll}{ \bold{Name} \tab \bold{City} \tab \bold{Type} \tab
#' \bold{Mean} \tab \bold{RDS I (SH)} \tab \bold{RDS II (VH)} \tab \bold{SS}
#' \cr fauxsycamore \tab Oxford\tab seed dependency, 70\% \tab
#' 0.2408 \tab 0.1087 \tab 0.1372 \tab 0.1814\cr fauxmadrona \tab
#' Seattle\tab no seed dependency, 50\% \tab 0.2592 \tab 0.1592 \tab 0.1644
#' \tab 0.1941}
#'
#' Even with only 50\% sample, the VH is substantially biased , and the SS
#' does much better.
#'
#' @name fauxmadrona
#' @aliases fauxmadrona fauxmadrona.network
#' @docType data
#' @format An \code{rds.data.frame}
#' @seealso \code{\link{fauxsycamore}}, \code{\link{faux}}
#' @references Gile, Krista J., Handcock, Mark S., 2010 \emph{Respondent-driven
#' Sampling: An Assessment of Current Methodology}, \emph{Sociological
#' Methodology}, 40, 285-327.
#' @source The original network is included as
#' \code{fauxmadrona.network} as a \code{network} object. \cr The data set
#' also includes the \code{data.frame} of the RDS data set as
#' \code{fauxmadrona}. \cr Use \code{data(package="RDS")} to get a full list
#' of datasets.
#'
#' @keywords datasets
NULL
#' A Simulated RDS Data Set with extreme seed dependency
#'
#' This is a faux set used to demonstrate RDS functions and analysis. The
#' population had N=715 nodes. In this case, the sample size is 500 so that
#' there is a relatively large sample fraction (70\%). There is homophily on
#' disease status (R=5) and there is differential activity by disease status
#' whereby the infected nodes have mean degree twice that of the uninfected
#' (w=1.8).
#'
#' In the sampling the seeds are chosen randomly from the infected population,
#' so there is extreme dependency induced by seed selection.
#'
#' Each sample member is given 2 uniquely identified coupons to distribute to
#' other members of the target population in their acquaintance. Further each
#' respondent distributes their coupons completely at random from among those
#' they are connected to.
#'
#' With 70\% sample, the VH is substantially biased, so the SS (and presumably
#' MA) do much better. We expect the MA to perform a bit better than the SS.
#'
#' It is network 702 and its sample from YesYes on mosix. Look for
#' "extract702.R" \cr The original network is included as
#' \code{fauxsycamore.network} as a \code{network} object. \cr The data set
#' also includes the \code{data.frame} of the RDS data set as
#' \code{fauxsycamore}. \cr Use \code{data(package="RDS")} to get a full list
#' of datasets.
#'
#' @name fauxsycamore
#' @aliases fauxsycamore fauxsycamore.network
#' @docType data
#' @format An rds.data.frame plus the original network as a network object
#' @seealso \code{\link{faux}}, \code{\link{fauxmadrona}}
#' @references Gile, Krista J., Handcock, Mark S., 2009.
#' \emph{Respondent-driven Sampling: An Assessment of Current Methodology},
#' \emph{Sociological Methodology}, 40, 285-327.
#' @keywords datasets
NULL
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.