knitr::opts_chunk$set( collapse = TRUE, comment = "#>", echo = TRUE, warning = FALSE, message = FALSE )
caretEnsemble
is a package for making ensembles of caret models. You should already be somewhat familiar with the caret package before trying out caretEnsemble
.
caretEnsemble
has 3 primary functions: caretList
, caretEnsemble
and caretStack
. caretList
is used to build lists of caret models on the same training data, with the same re-sampling parameters. caretEnsemble
and caretStack
are used to create ensemble models from such lists of caret models. caretEnsemble
uses a glm to create a simple linear blend of models and caretStack
uses a caret model to combine the outputs from several component caret models.
caretList
is a flexible function for fitting many different caret models, with the same resampling parameters, to the same dataset. It returns a convenient list
of caret objects which can later be passed to caretEnsemble
and caretStack
. caretList
has almost exactly the same arguments as train
(from the caret package), with the exception that the trControl
argument comes last. It can handle both the formula interface and the explicit x
, y
interface to train. As in caret, the formula interface introduces some overhead and the x
, y
interface is preferred.
caretEnsemble
has 2 arguments that can be used to specify which models to fit: methodList
and tuneList
. methodList
is a simple character vector of methods that will be fit with the default train
parameters, while tuneList
can be used to customize the call to each component model and will be discussed in more detail later. First, lets build an example dataset (adapted from the caret vignette):
data(Sonar, package = "mlbench") set.seed(107L) inTrain <- caret::createDataPartition(y = Sonar$Class, p = 0.75, list = FALSE) training <- Sonar[inTrain, ] testing <- Sonar[-inTrain, ]
model_list <- caretEnsemble::caretList( Class ~ ., data = training, methodList = c("glmnet", "rpart") ) print(summary(model_list))
(As with train
, the formula interface is convenient but introduces move overhead. For large datasets the explicitly passing x
and y
is preferred).
We can use the predict
function to extract predictions from this object for new data:
p <- predict(model_list, newdata = head(testing)) knitr::kable(p, format = "markdown")
If you desire more control over the model fit, use the caretModelSpec
to construct a list of model specifications for the tuneList
argument. This argument can be used to fit several different variants of the same model, and can also be used to pass arguments through train
down to the component functions (e.g. trace=FALSE
for nnet
):
model_list_big <- caretEnsemble::caretList( Class ~ ., data = training, methodList = c("glmnet", "rpart"), tuneList = list( rf1 = caretEnsemble::caretModelSpec(method = "rf", tuneGrid = data.frame(.mtry = 2L)), rf2 = caretEnsemble::caretModelSpec(method = "rf", tuneGrid = data.frame(.mtry = 10L), preProcess = "pca"), nn = caretEnsemble::caretModelSpec(method = "nnet", tuneLength = 2L, trace = FALSE) ) ) print(summary(model_list_big))
Finally, you should note that caretList
does not support custom caret models. Fitting those models are beyond the scope of this vignette, but if you do so, you can manually add them to the model list (e.g. model_list_big[["my_custom_model"]] <- my_custom_model
). Just be sure to use the same re-sampling indexes in trControl
as you use in the caretList
models!
caretList
is the preferred way to construct list of caret models in this package, as it will ensure the resampling indexes are identical across all models. Lets take a closer look at our list of models:
lattice::xyplot(caret::resamples(model_list))
As you can see from this plot, these 2 models are uncorrelated, and the rpart model is occasionally anti-predictive, with a one re-sample showing AUC of 0.46.
We can confirm the 2 model"s correlation with the modelCor
function from caret (caret has a lot of convenient functions for analyzing lists of models):
caret::modelCor(caret::resamples(model_list))
These 2 models make a good candidate for an ensemble: their predictions are fairly uncorrelated, but their overall accuracy is similar. We do a simple, linear greedy optimization on AUC using caretEnsemble:
greedy_ensemble <- caretEnsemble::caretEnsemble(model_list) print(summary(greedy_ensemble))
model_preds <- predict(model_list, newdata = testing, excluded_class_id = 2L) ens_preds <- predict(greedy_ensemble, newdata = testing, excluded_class_id = 2L) model_preds$ensemble <- ens_preds auc <- caTools::colAUC(model_preds, testing$Class) print(auc)
The ensemble has an AUC on the training set resamples of r round(auc[1, 'ensemble'], 2)
which is about r round(auc[1, 'ensemble'] - max(auc[1, 'glmnet'], auc[1, 'rpart']), 3) * 100
% better than the best individual model.
Note that the levels for the Sonar Data are "M" and "R", where M is level 1 and R is level 2. "M" stands for "metal cylinder" and "R" stands for rock. M is the positive class, so we exclude class 2L from our predictions. You can set excluded_class_id = 0L
p <- predict(greedy_ensemble, newdata = head(testing), excluded_class_id = 0L) knitr::kable(p, format = "markdown")
We can also use varImp to extract the variable importances from each member of the ensemble, as well as the final ensemble model:
round(caret::varImp(greedy_ensemble), 4L)
glm_ensemble <- caretEnsemble::caretStack(model_list, method = "glm") model_preds2 <- model_preds model_preds2$ensemble <- predict(glm_ensemble, newdata = testing, excluded_class_id = 2L) print(caTools::colAUC(model_preds2, testing$Class)) CF <- coef(glm_ensemble$ens_model$finalModel)[-1L] print(CF / sum(CF))
Note that glm_ensemble$ens_model
is a regular caret object of class train
. The glm-weighted model weights (glm vs rpart) and test-set AUCs are extremely similar to the caretEnsemble greedy optimization.
We can also use more sophisticated ensembles than simple linear weights, but these models are much more susceptible to over-fitting, and generally require large sets of resamples to train on (n=50 or higher for bootstrap samples). Lets try one anyways:
gbm_ensemble <- caretEnsemble::caretStack( model_list, method = "gbm", verbose = FALSE, tuneLength = 5L ) model_preds3 <- model_preds model_preds3$ensemble <- predict(gbm_ensemble, newdata = testing, excluded_class_id = 2L) caTools::colAUC(model_preds3, testing$Class)
In this case, the sophisticated ensemble is no better than a simple weighted linear combination. Non-linear ensembles seem to work best when you have:
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.