difR-package: Collection of methods to detect dichotomous differential item...

Description Details Author(s) References See Also

Description

The difR package contains several traditional methods to detect DIF in dichotomously scored items. Both uniform and non-uniform DIF effects can be detected, with methods relying upon item response models or not. Some methods deal with more than one focal group.

Methods currently available are:

  1. Transformed Item Difficulties (TID) method (Angoff and Ford, 1973)

  2. Mantel-Haenszel (Holland and Thayer, 1988)

  3. Standardization (Dorans and Kullick, 1986)

  4. Breslow-Day (Aguerri et al., 2009; Penfield, 2003)

  5. Logistic regression (Swaminathan and Rogers, 1990)

  6. Lord's chi-square test (Lord, 1980)

  7. Raju's area (Raju, 1990)

  8. Likelihood-ratio test (Thissen, Steinberg and Wainer, 1988)

  9. Generalized Mantel-Haenszel (Penfield, 2001)

  10. Generalized logistic regression (Magis, Raiche, Beland and Gerard, 2011)

  11. Generalized Lord's chi-square test (Kim, Cohen and Park, 1995).

The difR package is further described in Magis, Beland, Tuerlinckx and De Boeck (2010).

Details

Package: difR
Type: Package
Version: 4.6
Date: 2015-04-24
Depends: R (>= 2.8.0), lme4, ltm
License: see file LICENSE

Author(s)

Sebastien Beland
Collectif pour le Developpement et les Applications en Mesure et Evaluation (Cdame)
Universite du Quebec a Montreal
sebastien.beland.1@hotmail.com, http://www.cdame.uqam.ca/
David Magis
Department of Education, University of Liege
Research Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven
David.Magis@ulg.ac.be, http://ppw.kuleuven.be/okp/home/
Gilles Raiche
Collectif pour le Developpement et les Applications en Mesure et Evaluation (Cdame)
Universite du Quebec a Montreal
raiche.gilles@uqam.ca, http://www.cdame.uqam.ca/

References

Aguerri, M.E., Galibert, M.S., Attorresi, H.F. and Maranon, P.P. (2009). Erroneous detection of nonuniform DIF using the Breslow-Day test in a short test. Quality and Quantity, 43, 35-44.

Angoff, W. H., and Ford, S. F. (1973). Item-race interaction on a test of scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Measurement, 95-106.

Dorans, N. J. and Kullick, E. (1986). Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 355-368.

Holland, P. W. and Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In H. Wainer and H. I. Braun (Dirs.), Test validity. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kim, S.-H., Cohen, A.S. and Park, T.-H. (1995). Detection of differential item functioning in multiple groups. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 261-276.

Lord, F. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Magis, D., Beland, S., Tuerlinckx, F. and De Boeck, P. (2010). A general framework and an R package for the detection of dichotomous differential item functioning. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 847-862.

Magis, D., Raiche, G., Beland, S. and Gerard, P. (2011). A logistic regression procedure to detect differential item functioning among multiple groups. Unpublished manuscript.

Penfield, R. D. (2001). Assessing differential item functioning among multiple groups: a comparison of three Mantel-Haenszel procedures. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 235-259.

Penfield, R.D. (2003). Application of the Breslow-Day test of trend in odds ratio heterogeneity to the detection of nonuniform DIF. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 49, 231-243.

Raju, N. S. (1990). Determining the significance of estimated signed and unsigned areas between two item response functions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 197-207.

Swaminathan, H. and Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361-370.

Thissen, D., Steinberg, L. and Wainer, H. (1988). Use of item response theory in the study of group difference in trace lines. In H. Wainer and H. Braun (Eds.), Test validity. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

See Also

Other useful packages can be found in the R Psychometric task view.



difR documentation built on May 19, 2017, 1:28 p.m.
Search within the difR package
Search all R packages, documentation and source code

Questions? Problems? Suggestions? Tweet to @rdrrHQ or email at ian@mutexlabs.com.

Please suggest features or report bugs in the GitHub issue tracker.

All documentation is copyright its authors; we didn't write any of that.