| gs_design_npe | R Documentation |
The following two functions allow a non-constant treatment effect over time, but also can be applied for the usual homogeneous effect size designs. They require treatment effect and statistical information at each analysis as well as a method of deriving bounds, such as spending. Initial bound types supported are spending bounds and fixed bounds. These routines enables two things not available in the gsDesign package: 1) non-constant effect, 2) more flexibility in boundary selection.
gs_power_npe() derives group sequential bounds and boundary crossing probabilities
for a design, given treatment effect and information at each analysis and the
method of deriving bounds, such as spending.
gs_design_npe() derives group sequential design size,
bounds and boundary crossing probabilities based on proportionate
information and effect size at analyses, as well as the
method of deriving bounds, such as spending.
The only differences in arguments between the two functions are the alpha and beta
parameters used in the gs_design_npe().
gs_design_npe(
theta = 0.1,
theta0 = 0,
theta1 = theta,
info = 1,
info0 = NULL,
info1 = NULL,
info_scale = c("h0_h1_info", "h0_info", "h1_info"),
alpha = 0.025,
beta = 0.1,
upper = gs_b,
upar = qnorm(0.975),
lower = gs_b,
lpar = -Inf,
test_upper = TRUE,
test_lower = TRUE,
binding = FALSE,
r = 18,
tol = 1e-06
)
gs_power_npe(
theta = 0.1,
theta0 = 0,
theta1 = theta,
info = 1,
info0 = NULL,
info1 = NULL,
info_scale = c("h0_h1_info", "h0_info", "h1_info"),
upper = gs_b,
upar = qnorm(0.975),
lower = gs_b,
lpar = -Inf,
test_upper = TRUE,
test_lower = TRUE,
binding = FALSE,
r = 18,
tol = 1e-06
)
theta |
Natural parameter for group sequential design representing
expected cumulative drift at all analyses; used for power calculation.
It can be a scalar (constant treatment effect) or a vector (non-constant treatment effect).
The user must provide a value for |
theta0 |
Natural parameter for null hypothesis. It can be a scalar (constant treatment effect) or a vector (non-constant treatment effect). The default is 0. If a value other than 0 is provided, it affects upper bound computation. |
theta1 |
Natural parameter for alternate hypothesis,
if needed for lower bound computation.
It can be a scalar (constant treatment effect) or a vector (non-constant treatment effect).
The default is the same as |
info |
Statistical information at all analyses for input |
info0 |
Statistical information under null hypothesis.
It is a vector of all positive numbers with increasing order.
Default is set to be the same as |
info1 |
Statistical information under hypothesis used for futility bound calculation.
It is a vector of all positive numbers with increasing order.
Default is set to be the same as |
info_scale |
Information scale for calculation. Options are:
|
alpha |
One-sided Type I error. |
beta |
Type II error. |
upper |
Function to compute upper bound.
|
upar |
Parameters passed to
|
lower |
Function to compute lower bound, which can be set up similarly as |
lpar |
Parameters passed to |
test_upper |
Indicator of which analyses should include
an upper (efficacy) bound;
single value of |
test_lower |
Indicator of which analyses should include a lower bound;
single value of |
binding |
Indicator of whether futility bound is binding;
default of |
r |
Integer value controlling grid for numerical integration as in
Jennison and Turnbull (2000); default is 18, range is 1 to 80.
Larger values provide larger number of grid points and greater accuracy.
Normally, |
tol |
Tolerance parameter for boundary convergence (on Z-scale); normally not changed by the user. |
The bound specifications (upper, lower, upar, lpar) of gs_design_npe()
will be used to ensure Type I error and other boundary properties are as specified.
See the help file of gs_spending_bound() for details on spending function.
A tibble with columns of
analysis: analysis index.
bound: either of value "upper" or "lower", indicating the upper and lower bound.
z: the Z-score bounds.
probability: cumulative probability of crossing the bound at or before the analysis.
theta: same as the input.
theta1: same as the input.
info: statistical information at each analysis.
If it is returned by gs_power_npe, the info, info0, info1 are same as the input.
If it is returned by gs_design_npe, the info, info0, info1 are changed by a constant scale factor.
factor to ensure the design has power 1 - beta.
info0: statistical information under the null at each analysis.
info1: statistical information under the alternative at each analysis.
info_frac: information fraction at each analysis, i.e., info / max(info).
The contents of this section are shown in PDF user manual only.
The contents of this section are shown in PDF user manual only.
Keaven Anderson keaven_anderson@merck.com
library(gsDesign)
# Example 1 ----
# gs_design_npe with single analysis
# Lachin book p 71 difference of proportions example
pc <- .28 # Control response rate
pe <- .40 # Experimental response rate
p0 <- (pc + pe) / 2 # Ave response rate under H0
# Information per increment of 1 in sample size
info0 <- 1 / (p0 * (1 - p0) * 4)
info <- 1 / (pc * (1 - pc) * 2 + pe * (1 - pe) * 2)
# Result should round up to next even number = 652
# Divide information needed under H1 by information per patient added
gs_design_npe(theta = pe - pc, info = info, info0 = info0)
# Example 2 ----
# gs_design_npe with with fixed bound
x <- gs_design_npe(
alpha = 0.0125,
theta = c(.1, .2, .3),
info = (1:3) * 80,
info0 = (1:3) * 80,
upper = gs_b,
upar = gsDesign::gsDesign(k = 3, sfu = gsDesign::sfLDOF, alpha = 0.0125)$upper$bound,
lower = gs_b,
lpar = c(-1, 0, 0)
)
x
# Same upper bound; this represents non-binding Type I error and will total 0.025
gs_power_npe(
theta = rep(0, 3),
info = (x |> dplyr::filter(bound == "upper"))$info,
upper = gs_b,
upar = (x |> dplyr::filter(bound == "upper"))$z,
lower = gs_b,
lpar = rep(-Inf, 3)
)
# Example 3 ----
# gs_design_npe with spending bound
# Design with futility only at analysis 1; efficacy only at analyses 2, 3
# Spending bound for efficacy; fixed bound for futility
# NOTE: test_upper and test_lower DO NOT WORK with gs_b; must explicitly make bounds infinite
# test_upper and test_lower DO WORK with gs_spending_bound
gs_design_npe(
theta = c(.1, .2, .3),
info = (1:3) * 40,
info0 = (1:3) * 40,
upper = gs_spending_bound,
upar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfLDOF, total_spend = 0.025, param = NULL, timing = NULL),
lower = gs_b,
lpar = c(-1, -Inf, -Inf),
test_upper = c(FALSE, TRUE, TRUE)
)
# one can try `info_scale = "h1_info"` or `info_scale = "h0_info"` here
gs_design_npe(
theta = c(.1, .2, .3),
info = (1:3) * 40,
info0 = (1:3) * 30,
info_scale = "h1_info",
upper = gs_spending_bound,
upar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfLDOF, total_spend = 0.025, param = NULL, timing = NULL),
lower = gs_b,
lpar = c(-1, -Inf, -Inf),
test_upper = c(FALSE, TRUE, TRUE)
)
# Example 4 ----
# gs_design_npe with spending function bounds
# 2-sided asymmetric bounds
# Lower spending based on non-zero effect
gs_design_npe(
theta = c(.1, .2, .3),
info = (1:3) * 40,
info0 = (1:3) * 30,
upper = gs_spending_bound,
upar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfLDOF, total_spend = 0.025, param = NULL, timing = NULL),
lower = gs_spending_bound,
lpar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfHSD, total_spend = 0.1, param = -1, timing = NULL)
)
# Example 5 ----
# gs_design_npe with two-sided symmetric spend, O'Brien-Fleming spending
# Typically, 2-sided bounds are binding
xx <- gs_design_npe(
theta = c(.1, .2, .3),
info = (1:3) * 40,
binding = TRUE,
upper = gs_spending_bound,
upar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfLDOF, total_spend = 0.025, param = NULL, timing = NULL),
lower = gs_spending_bound,
lpar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfLDOF, total_spend = 0.025, param = NULL, timing = NULL)
)
xx
# Re-use these bounds under alternate hypothesis
# Always use binding = TRUE for power calculations
gs_power_npe(
theta = c(.1, .2, .3),
info = (1:3) * 40,
binding = TRUE,
upper = gs_b,
lower = gs_b,
upar = (xx |> dplyr::filter(bound == "upper"))$z,
lpar = -(xx |> dplyr::filter(bound == "upper"))$z
)
# Example 6 ----
# Default of gs_power_npe (single analysis; Type I error controlled)
gs_power_npe(theta = 0) |> dplyr::filter(bound == "upper")
# Example 7 ----
# gs_power_npe with fixed bound
gs_power_npe(
theta = c(.1, .2, .3),
info = (1:3) * 40,
upper = gs_b,
upar = gsDesign::gsDesign(k = 3, sfu = gsDesign::sfLDOF)$upper$bound,
lower = gs_b,
lpar = c(-1, 0, 0)
)
# Same fixed efficacy bounds, no futility bound (i.e., non-binding bound), null hypothesis
gs_power_npe(
theta = rep(0, 3),
info = (1:3) * 40,
upar = gsDesign::gsDesign(k = 3, sfu = gsDesign::sfLDOF)$upper$bound,
lpar = rep(-Inf, 3)
) |>
dplyr::filter(bound == "upper")
# Example 8 ----
# gs_power_npe with fixed bound testing futility only at analysis 1; efficacy only at analyses 2, 3
gs_power_npe(
theta = c(.1, .2, .3),
info = (1:3) * 40,
upper = gs_b,
upar = c(Inf, 3, 2),
lower = gs_b,
lpar = c(qnorm(.1), -Inf, -Inf)
)
# Example 9 ----
# gs_power_npe with spending function bounds
# Lower spending based on non-zero effect
gs_power_npe(
theta = c(.1, .2, .3),
info = (1:3) * 40,
upper = gs_spending_bound,
upar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfLDOF, total_spend = 0.025, param = NULL, timing = NULL),
lower = gs_spending_bound,
lpar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfHSD, total_spend = 0.1, param = -1, timing = NULL)
)
# Same bounds, but power under different theta
gs_power_npe(
theta = c(.15, .25, .35),
info = (1:3) * 40,
upper = gs_spending_bound,
upar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfLDOF, total_spend = 0.025, param = NULL, timing = NULL),
lower = gs_spending_bound,
lpar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfHSD, total_spend = 0.1, param = -1, timing = NULL)
)
# Example 10 ----
# gs_power_npe with two-sided symmetric spend, O'Brien-Fleming spending
# Typically, 2-sided bounds are binding
x <- gs_power_npe(
theta = rep(0, 3),
info = (1:3) * 40,
binding = TRUE,
upper = gs_spending_bound,
upar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfLDOF, total_spend = 0.025, param = NULL, timing = NULL),
lower = gs_spending_bound,
lpar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfLDOF, total_spend = 0.025, param = NULL, timing = NULL)
)
# Re-use these bounds under alternate hypothesis
# Always use binding = TRUE for power calculations
gs_power_npe(
theta = c(.1, .2, .3),
info = (1:3) * 40,
binding = TRUE,
upar = (x |> dplyr::filter(bound == "upper"))$z,
lpar = -(x |> dplyr::filter(bound == "upper"))$z
)
# Example 11 ----
# Different values of `r` and `tol` lead to different numerical accuracy
# Larger `r` and smaller `tol` give better accuracy, but leads to slow computation
n_analysis <- 5
gs_power_npe(
theta = 0.1,
info = 1:n_analysis,
info0 = 1:n_analysis,
info1 = NULL,
info_scale = "h0_info",
upper = gs_spending_bound,
upar = list(sf = gsDesign::sfLDOF, total_spend = 0.025, param = NULL, timing = NULL),
lower = gs_b,
lpar = -rep(Inf, n_analysis),
test_upper = TRUE,
test_lower = FALSE,
binding = FALSE,
# Try different combinations of (r, tol) with
# r in 6, 18, 24, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100
# tol in 1e-6, 1e-12
r = 6,
tol = 1e-6
)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.