View source: R/api-simulation-spec.R
| build_peer_review_sim_spec | R Documentation |
Build a peer-review simulation specification
build_peer_review_sim_spec(
n_submission = 50,
n_criterion = 4,
reviewers_per_submission = 3,
anchor_fraction = 0.1,
anchor_submissions = NULL,
anchor_reviewers_per_submission = NULL,
avoid_self_review = TRUE,
assignment_mode = c("balanced", "random"),
seed = NULL,
score_levels = 4,
theta_sd = 1,
reviewer_sd = 0.45,
criterion_sd = 0.25,
noise_sd = 0,
step_span = 1.4,
model = c("RSM", "PCM", "GPCM"),
step_facet = "Criterion",
thresholds = NULL,
group_levels = NULL,
dif_effects = NULL,
interaction_effects = NULL
)
n_submission |
Number of submissions/authors to generate. |
n_criterion |
Number of rubric criteria. |
reviewers_per_submission |
Number of peer reviewers assigned to each ordinary submission. |
anchor_fraction |
Fraction of submissions treated as common-link
anchor submissions when |
anchor_submissions |
Optional number of common-link anchor
submissions. Anchor submissions receive
|
anchor_reviewers_per_submission |
Number of reviewers assigned to each anchor submission. Defaults to all eligible peers when anchors are used and self-review is disallowed; recorded as 0 when no anchor submissions are requested. |
avoid_self_review |
Logical; if |
assignment_mode |
Assignment algorithm. |
seed |
Optional seed used only for random peer-review assignment when
|
score_levels, theta_sd, reviewer_sd, criterion_sd, noise_sd, step_span |
Generator settings passed to |
model, step_facet, thresholds |
Measurement-model settings passed to
|
group_levels, dif_effects, interaction_effects |
Optional signal settings
passed to |
build_peer_review_sim_spec() creates a fixed person-by-reviewer-by-rubric
skeleton for peer-assessment or peer-review studies. Submissions and peer
reviewers share the same ID universe (P001, P002, ...), so
self-review can be structurally excluded and checked in the generated data.
The specification uses the existing assignment = "skeleton" generator and
records peer-review metadata; it does not introduce a new measurement
model. MFRM still estimates person/submission measures, reviewer severity,
and criterion difficulty, while design-network review can inspect whether
the peer-review graph is sufficiently linked.
The common-link anchor controls follow the same logic used in sparse rater-mediated designs: when most submissions receive only a few peer reviews, assigning all or many reviewers to a small anchor set can strengthen links among reviewers. The helper labels these rows as design diagnostics, not universal adequacy thresholds for fit, separation, or recovery.
An object of class mfrm_sim_spec with peer_review metadata and
a fixed peer-review design skeleton.
Farrokhi, F., Esfandiari, R., & Schaefer, E. (2012). A many-facet Rasch measurement of differential rater severity/leniency in three types of assessment. JALT Journal, 34(1), 79-102. doi:10.37546/JALTJJ34.1-3.
Uto, M., & Ueno, M. (2020). A generalized many-facet Rasch model and its Bayesian estimation using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Behaviormetrika, 47, 469-496. doi:10.1007/s41237-020-00115-7.
DeMars, C. E., Shapovalov, Y. A., & Hathcoat, J. D. (2023). Many-Facet Rasch Designs: How Should Raters be Assigned to Examinees? NCME presentation.
simulate_mfrm_data(), build_mfrm_network_review(),
build_mfrm_sim_spec()
peer_spec <- build_peer_review_sim_spec(
n_submission = 12,
n_criterion = 3,
reviewers_per_submission = 2,
anchor_submissions = 2
)
peer_spec$peer_review$overview
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.