| build_weighting_review | R Documentation |
Build a weighting-policy review between Rasch-family and bounded GPCM fits
build_weighting_review(
rasch_fit,
gpcm_fit,
theta_range = c(-6, 6),
theta_points = 101L,
top_n = 10L
)
rasch_fit |
Output from |
gpcm_fit |
Output from |
theta_range |
Numeric vector of length 2 passed to |
theta_points |
Integer number of theta grid points passed to
|
top_n |
Maximum number of rows to keep in compact summary outputs. |
build_weighting_review() is an operational model-choice review helper. It
is designed for the common question:
what changes when a Rasch-family equal-weighting model is replaced with a
bounded GPCM that allows discrimination-based reweighting?
The helper does not estimate a new model. Instead, it synthesizes four package-native evidence sources:
compare_mfrm() for same-data model comparison
the non-person facet measures from each fit
the bounded GPCM slope table
compute_information() for design-weighted information redistribution
The result is intended for substantive review, not for automatic model
selection. In particular, a better-fitting GPCM should not by itself be
interpreted as a reason to discard an equal-weighting Rasch-family route.
An object of class mfrm_weighting_review.
Fit an equal-weighting reference model with model = "RSM" or "PCM".
Fit a bounded GPCM on the same prepared response data.
Run build_weighting_review(rasch_fit, gpcm_fit).
Read summary(review) before deciding whether the discrimination-based
reweighting is substantively acceptable.
model_comparison: same-data model-comparison bundle from compare_mfrm().
facet_shift: how non-person facet estimates move under bounded GPCM.
slope_profile: which slope_facet levels are upweighted or downweighted.
information_redistribution: within-facet information-share changes
between the Rasch-family fit and bounded GPCM.
top_reweighted_levels: compact triage table for the strongest
slope-facet-level redistribution signals.
This helper is available only for the current bounded GPCM branch. It
requires the package's existing slope_facet == step_facet contract and
should be read as an operational weighting-policy review, not as a formal
validity adjudication.
compare_mfrm(), compute_information(), gpcm_capability_matrix()
toy <- load_mfrmr_data("example_core")
rasch_fit <- fit_mfrm(
toy,
"Person",
c("Rater", "Criterion"),
"Score",
method = "MML",
model = "RSM",
quad_points = 9
)
gpcm_fit <- fit_mfrm(
toy,
"Person",
c("Rater", "Criterion"),
"Score",
method = "MML",
model = "GPCM",
step_facet = "Criterion",
slope_facet = "Criterion",
quad_points = 9
)
review <- build_weighting_review(rasch_fit, gpcm_fit, theta_points = 41)
summary(review)
review$top_reweighted_levels
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.