View source: R/api-plotting-secondary.R
| plot_reliability_snapshot | R Documentation |
Compact facet-level visual of the Wright & Masters (1982)
separation, strata, and reliability indices that
diagnose_mfrm() computes. Helpful as a single small figure for
"are persons / raters / criteria distinguishable?" review.
These are Rasch/FACETS-style separation indices on the fitted logit
scale, not ICCs; use compute_facet_icc() for the complementary
observed-score variance-share view.
plot_reliability_snapshot(
fit,
diagnostics = NULL,
metric = c("reliability", "separation", "strata"),
preset = c("standard", "publication", "compact", "monochrome"),
draw = TRUE
)
fit |
An |
diagnostics |
Optional |
metric |
|
preset |
Visual preset. |
draw |
If |
An mfrm_plot_data whose data slot bundles a tidy
Facet, Metric, Value data frame.
diagnose_mfrm(), mfrmr_visual_diagnostics
toy <- load_mfrmr_data("example_core")
fit <- fit_mfrm(toy, "Person", c("Rater", "Criterion"), "Score",
method = "JML", maxit = 30)
p <- plot_reliability_snapshot(fit, draw = FALSE)
p$data$table
# Look for (default `metric = "reliability"`):
# - >= 0.9 strong, 0.7-0.9 adequate, < 0.7 weak (Wright & Masters 1982).
# - The Person row is the operative reliability for ability scores.
# - Non-Person rows (Rater / Criterion) report the same index but
# should be read as "are facet elements distinguishable?"; values
# close to 1 mean facet means differ reliably from each other.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.