twophase: Coxian phase-type distribution with two phases

In msm: Multi-State Markov and Hidden Markov Models in Continuous Time

Coxian phase-type distribution with two phases

Description

Density, distribution, quantile functions and other utilities for the Coxian phase-type distribution with two phases.

Usage

d2phase(x, l1, mu1, mu2, log = FALSE)

p2phase(q, l1, mu1, mu2, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE)

q2phase(p, l1, mu1, mu2, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE)

r2phase(n, l1, mu1, mu2)

h2phase(x, l1, mu1, mu2, log = FALSE)

Arguments

x, q	vector of quantiles.
l1	Intensity for transition between phase 1 and phase 2.
mu1	Intensity for transition from phase 1 to exit.
mu2	Intensity for transition from phase 2 to exit.
log	logical; if TRUE, return log density or log hazard.
lower.tail	logical; if TRUE (default), probabilities are P[X <= x], otherwise, P[X > x].
log.p	logical; if TRUE, probabilities p are given as log(p).
p	vector of probabilities.
n	number of observations. If length(n) > 1, the length is taken to be the number required.

Details

This is the distribution of the time to reach state 3 in a continuous-time Markov model with three states and transitions permitted from state 1 to state 2 (with intensity \lambda_1) state 1 to state 3 (intensity \mu_1) and state 2 to state 3 (intensity \mu_2). States 1 and 2 are the two "phases" and state 3 is the "exit" state.

The density is

f(t | \lambda_1, \mu_1) = e^{-(\lambda_1+\mu_1)t}(\mu_1 + (\lambda_1+\mu_1)\lambda_1 t)

if \lambda_1 + \mu_1 = \mu_2, and

f(t | \lambda_1, \mu_1, \mu_2) = \frac{(\lambda_1+\mu_1)e^{-(\lambda_1+\mu_1)t}(\mu_2-\mu_1) + \mu_2\lambda_1e^{-\mu_2t}}{\lambda_1+\mu_1-\mu_2}

otherwise. The distribution function is

F(t | \lambda_1, \mu_1) = 1 - e^{-(\lambda_1+\mu_1) t} (1 + \lambda_1 t)

if \lambda_1 + \mu_1 = \mu_2, and

F(t | \lambda_1, \mu_1, \mu_2) = 1 - \frac{e^{-(\lambda_1 + \mu_1)t} (\mu_2 - \mu_1) + \lambda_1 e^{-\mu_2 t}}{ \lambda_1 + \mu_1 - \mu_2}

otherwise. Quantiles are calculated by numerically inverting the distribution function.

The mean is (1 + \lambda_1/\mu_2) / (\lambda_1 + \mu_1).

The variance is (2 + 2\lambda_1(\lambda_1+\mu_1+ \mu_2)/\mu_2^2 - (1 + \lambda_1/\mu_2)^2)/(\lambda_1+\mu_1)^2.

If \mu_1=\mu_2 it reduces to an exponential distribution with rate \mu_1, and the parameter \lambda_1 is redundant. Or also if \lambda_1=0.

The hazard at x=0 is \mu_1, and smoothly increasing if \mu_1<\mu_2. If \lambda_1 + \mu_1 \geq \mu_2 it increases to an asymptote of \mu_2, and if \lambda_1 + \mu_1 \leq \mu_2 it increases to an asymptote of \lambda_1 + \mu_1. The hazard is decreasing if \mu_1>\mu_2, to an asymptote of \mu_2.

Value

d2phase gives the density, p2phase gives the distribution function, q2phase gives the quantile function, r2phase generates random deviates, and h2phase gives the hazard.

Alternative parameterisation

An individual following this distribution can be seen as coming from a mixture of two populations:

1) "short stayers" whose mean sojourn time is M_1 = 1/(\lambda_1+\mu_1) and sojourn distribution is exponential with rate \lambda_1 + \mu_1.

2) "long stayers" whose mean sojourn time M_2 = 1/(\lambda_1+\mu_1) + 1/\mu_2 and sojourn distribution is the sum of two exponentials with rate \lambda_1 + \mu_1 and \mu_2 respectively. The individual is a "long stayer" with probability p=\lambda_1/(\lambda_1 + \mu_1).

Thus a two-phase distribution can be more intuitively parameterised by the short and long stay means M_1 < M_2 and the long stay probability p. Given these parameters, the transition intensities are \lambda_1=p/M_1, \mu_1=(1-p)/M_1, and \mu_2=1/(M_2-M_1). This can be useful for choosing intuitively reasonable initial values for procedures to fit these models to data.

The hazard is increasing at least if M_2 < 2M_1, and also only if (M_2 - 2M_1)/(M_2 - M_1) < p.

For increasing hazards with \lambda_1 + \mu_1 \leq \mu_2, the maximum hazard ratio between any time t and time 0 is 1/(1-p).

For increasing hazards with \lambda_1 + \mu_1 \geq \mu_2, the maximum hazard ratio is M_1/((1-p)(M_2 - M_1)). This is the minimum hazard ratio for decreasing hazards.

Author(s)

C. H. Jackson [e-mail]

References

C. Dutang, V. Goulet and M. Pigeon (2008). actuar: An R Package for Actuarial Science. Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 25, no. 7, 1-37. URL http://www.jstatsoft.org/v25/i07

msm documentation built on Nov. 24, 2023, 1:06 a.m.