Description Usage Format Author(s) References
This is the followup data from the experiment analyzed in Culp, Ryan, Chen, and Hamada (2018). These data were first presented and described in de Mast and van Wieringen (2010). Thirty parts were rated on a 4-point ordinal scale of 1-4 by each of 3 raters in a balanced design of 2 repetitions per combination of part and rater.
1 | data("followup")
|
This data frame has 30 rows (i.e., one for each part) and the following 6 columns.
Yi11ordinal value assigned by rater 1 on repetition 1.
Yi12ordinal value assigned by rater 1 on repetition 2.
Yi21ordinal value assigned by rater 2 on repetition 1.
Yi22ordinal value assigned by rater 2 on repetition 2.
Yi31ordinal value assigned by rater 3 on repetition 1.
Yi32ordinal value assigned by rater 3 on repetition 2.
Ken Ryan
Culp, S.L., Ryan, K.J., Chen, J., and Hamada, M.S. (2018). “Analysis of Repeatability and Reproducibility Studies with Ordinal Measurements.” Technometrics, doi:10.1080/00401706.2018.1429317.
de Mast, J. and van Wieringen, W.N. (2010). “Modeling and Evaluating Repeatability and Reproducibility of Ordinal Classifications.” Technometrics, 52(1), 94-106.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.