rddensity-package: rddensity: Manipulation Testing Based on Density...

In rddensity: Manipulation Testing Based on Density Discontinuity

rddensity: Manipulation Testing Based on Density Discontinuity

Description

Density discontinuity testing (a.k.a. manipulation testing) is commonly employed in regression discontinuity designs and other program evaluation settings to detect perfect self-selection (manipulation) around a cutoff where treatment/policy assignment changes.

This package implements manipulation testing procedures using the local polynomial density estimators proposed in Cattaneo, Jansson and Ma (2020), and implements graphical procedures with valid confidence bands using the results in Cattaneo, Jansson and Ma (2022, 2023). In addition, this package provides complementary manipulation testing based on finite sample exact binomial testing following the esults in Cattaneo, Frandsen and Titiunik (2015) and Cattaneo, Frandsen and Vazquez-Bare (2017).

A companion Stata package is described in Cattaneo, Jansson and Ma (2018).

Commands: rddensity for manipulation (density discontinuity) testing. rdbwdensity for data-driven bandwidth selection, and rdplotdensity for density plots.

Related Stata and R packages useful for inference in regression discontinuity (RD) designs are described in the website: https://rdpackages.github.io/.

Author(s)

Matias D. Cattaneo, Princeton University [e-mail].

Michael Jansson, University of California Berkeley. [e-mail].

Xinwei Ma (maintainer), University of California San Diego. [e-mail].

References

Calonico, S., M. D. Cattaneo, and M. H. Farrell. 2018. On the Effect of Bias Estimation on Coverage Accuracy in Nonparametric Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 113(522): 767-779. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1080/01621459.2017.1285776")}

Calonico, S., M. D. Cattaneo, and M. H. Farrell. 2022. Coverage Error Optimal Confidence Intervals for Local Polynomial Regression. Bernoulli, 28(4): 2998-3022. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.3150/21-BEJ1445")}

Cattaneo, M. D., B. Frandsen, and R. Titiunik. 2015. Randomization Inference in the Regression Discontinuity Design: An Application to the Study of Party Advantages in the U.S. Senate. Journal of Causal Inference 3(1): 1-24. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1515/jci-2013-0010")}

Cattaneo, M. D., M. Jansson, and X. Ma. 2018. Manipulation Testing based on Density Discontinuity. Stata Journal 18(1): 234-261. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1177/1536867X1801800115")}

Cattaneo, M. D., M. Jansson, and X. Ma. 2020. Simple Local Polynomial Density Estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(531): 1449-1455. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1080/01621459.2019.1635480")}

Cattaneo, M. D., M. Jansson, and X. Ma. 2022. lpdensity: Local Polynomial Density Estimation and Inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 101(2): 1–25. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.18637/jss.v101.i02")}

Cattaneo, M. D., M. Jansson, and X. Ma. 2023. Local Regression Distribution Estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 240(2): 105074. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.01.006")}

Cattaneo, M. D., R. Titiunik and G. Vazquez-Bare. 2017. Comparing Inference Approaches for RD Designs: A Reexamination of the Effect of Head Start on Child Mortality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 36(3): 643-681. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1002/pam.21985")}

McCrary, J. 2008. Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test. Journal of Econometrics 142(2): 698-714. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005")}

rddensity documentation built on Oct. 6, 2024, 9:06 a.m.