**secr** 5.4 - spatially explicit capture--recapture in R'

\vspace{12pt}

This document provides a compact overview of secr 5.4, an R package for spatially explicit capture--recapture analysis (SECR). For background on SECR and a tutorial see the SECR book, Efford (2025).

Add-on packages extend the capability of secr and are documented separately.

Introduction to SECR

Spatially explicit capture--recapture (SECR) is a set of methods for modelling animal capture--recapture data collected with an array of 'detectors'. The methods are used primarily to estimate population density, but they also have advantages over non-spatial methods when the goal is to estimate population size in a region defined by the researcher.

SECR methods overcome edge effects that are problematic in conventional capture--recapture estimation of animal populations (Otis et al. 1978). Detectors may be live-capture traps, with animals uniquely tagged, sticky traps or snags that passively sample hair, from which individuals are distinguished by their microsatellite DNA, or cameras that take photographs from which individuals are recognized by their natural marks. The concept of a detector extends to areas (polygons) or transects that are searched for animals or their sign.

The primary data for SECR are (i) the locations of the detectors, and (ii) detections of known individuals on one or more sampling occasions (i.e. their detection histories). The generic terms 'detector' and 'detections' cover several possibilities (see 'Detector types' below); we use them interchangeably with the more specific and familiar terms 'traps' and 'captures'. Table 1 gives a concrete example of trapping data (the structure differs for detectors that are not traps).

\vspace{12pt}

Table 1. Some spatially explicit detection data. Each entry (e.g., A9) records the detector at which a known animal (ID) was observed at each sample time (occasion). '.' indicates no detection. Each detector has known x-y coordinates. Formats for data input are described in secr-datainput.pdf.

              Occasion
 ID      1     2     3     4     5  
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 
  1     A9     .     .     .     .  
  2    A12   A12     .     .     .  
  3      .     .    C6    B5     .  
  4      .     .    G3     .    F3  
  etc.       

In SECR, a spatial model of the population and a spatial model of the detection process are fitted to the spatial detection histories. The resulting estimates of population density are unbiased by edge effects and incomplete detection (other sources of bias may remain). Inverse prediction (IP SECR) and maximum likelihood (ML SECR) are alternative methods for fitting the spatial detection model (Efford 2004, Borchers and Efford 2008). Of these, ML SECR is the more flexible, with a caveat for data from single-catch traps. Data augmentation and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods have also been used for SECR (Royle and Young 2008, Royle et al. 2009, Singh et al. 2010, Royle and Gardner 2011, Royle et al. 2014, Turek et al. 2021); this approach is slower than ML SECR and is not considered here.

State and observation models

Like other statistical methods for estimating animal abundance (Borchers et al. 2002), SECR combines a state model and an observation model. The state model describes the distribution of animal home ranges in the landscape, and the observation model (a spatial detection model) relates the probability of detecting an individual at a particular detector to the distance of the detector from a central point in each animal's home range. The distances are not observed directly (usually we don't know the range centres), so conventional distance sampling methods do not apply.

Distribution of home-range centres

The distribution of range centres in the population (Borchers and Efford 2008) will usually be treated as a homogeneous Poisson point process (Fig. 1a). Density (= intensity) is the sole parameter of a homogeneous Poisson process. An inhomogeneous Poisson distribution may also be fitted; this provides a means to evaluate the effects of habitat variables on density.

Detection functions

A detection model describes the decline in detection probability with distance ($d$) from the home-range centre (Fig. 1b). The probability $g(d)$ is for the 'ideal' case of just one animal and one detector; the actual probability may differ (see discussion of 'traps' under Detector Types).

library(secr)
## Following is not needed as no multithreaded operations in this vignette 
## To avoid ASAN/UBSAN errors on CRAN, following advice of Kevin Ushey
## e.g. https://github.com/RcppCore/RcppParallel/issues/169
Sys.setenv(RCPP_PARALLEL_BACKEND = "tinythread")
options(digits=6, width=85)

\vspace{8pt}

par(mfrow=c(1,2), pty='s', mar=c(2,1,2,2), cex=1.2, las = 1, bty = 'l',
    xpd=T, cex=1.2, xaxs='i', yaxs='i', lwd=1.5)

plot(sim.popn(D=5, core=make.grid(), buffer=150), cex=1)
plot(make.grid(),add=T, detpar=list(col = "red", pch = 3, cex = 1.2))
text(-160,300,'a.', cex=1.3)

par(mar=c(4,5,2,2))
plot(0,0, type='n', xlim=c(0,800), ylim=c(0,0.15),
   xlab='', ylab='', lwd=2, col='blue', axes = FALSE)
plot(stoat.model.HN, limits=FALSE, xv=0:800, ylim=c(0,0.12),
   xlab='', ylab='', lwd=2, col='blue', add = TRUE)
axis (1)
mtext(side=1, line=2.5, 'Distance  (m)', cex=1.2)
axis (2, at=c(0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15))
mtext(side=2, line=3.5, 'Detection probability', cex=1.2, las=0)
plot(stoat.model.EX, add=T, limits=F, xv=1:800, col='green', lwd=2)
legend (260,0.15, lwd=2, col=c('blue', 'green'),
    legend=c('halfnormal','exponential'), bty='n')
text(-450, 0.18,'b.', cex=1.3)

Fig. 1. (a) Hypothetical Poisson distribution of range centres near an array of detectors. Each dot represents one individual. SECR estimates the density of this distribution. (b) Alternative detection functions. The halfnormal is defined by $g(d) = g_0\exp\left(\frac{-d^2}{2\sigma^2}\right)$ and the exponential by $g(d) = g_0\exp\left(-\frac{d}{\sigma}\right)$. See ?detectfn for more.

Detector types

The properties of detectors are an important part of the SECR observation model (Table 2). Inside secr, data are tagged with a detector type to ensure they are printed, plotted and analysed appropriately.

Some common detectors (camera 'traps' and hair snags for DNA) do not capture animals, but merely record that an animal has visited a site. These 'proximity' detectors can be considered to act independently of each other. With proximity detectors, each animal $\times$ occasion 'cell' of a detection history potentially contains several positive records. In the simplest case each cell contains a binary vector coding presence or absence at each detector (for such binary proximity detectors each observation has a Bernoulli distribution). A 'count' detector is a generalised proximity detector in which the data are vectors of counts, one per detector. Models for 'count' data will specify a distribution for the counts via the 'binomN' argument of secr.fit (binomN = 0 indicates Poisson; binomN > 1 indicates binomial with size = binomN; binomN = 1 indicates binomial with size given by the 'usage' attribute for the detector and occasion).

Detectors that are true traps do not act independently because capture of an animal in one trap prevents it being caught in another trap until it is released. Traps expose animals to competing risks of capture. The per-trap probability of capture may be adjusted for the competing risk from other traps by using an additive hazard model (Borchers and Efford 2008). However, if the detectors are traps that catch only one animal at a time then there is a further level of competition -- between animals for traps. Multi-catch and single-catch traps therefore represent distinct detector types. No general adjustment has been found for the per-trap probability of capture in the single-catch case (it's an open research question), and there is strictly no known maximum likelihood estimator. Estimates of average density using the multi-catch likelihood for single-catch data appear only slightly biased (Efford, Borchers and Byrom 2009), and this substitution is made automatically in secr, with a warning. However, the substitution is imperfect when density varies (Distiller and Borchers 2015). Simulation and inverse prediction in ipsecr is an alternative and more robust method for single-catch data.

Polygon and transect detectors are for binary or count detection data (e.g., number of detections per animal per polygon per occasion) supplemented with the x-y coordinates of each detection. When a study uses multiple search areas or multiple transects, detections may be either independent or dependent (e.g., maximum one per animal per polygon per occasion) as with traps. The dependent or 'exclusive' type is indicated by the suffix 'X'; in this case the counts are necessarily binary. Using the 'polygonX' or 'transectX' detector type ensures that a competing-risk model is fitted.

Acoustic 'signal strength' detectors produce a binary detection vector supplemented by measurements of signal strength, as from an array of microphones.

There is limited support in secr for the analysis of locational data from telemetry ('telemetry' detector type). Telemetry data are used to augment capture--recapture data (see addTelemetry).

\vspace{12pt}

Table 2. Detector types in secr

| Detector | Description | |------------|-------------------------------------------| | single | traps that catch one animal at a time | | multi | traps that may catch more than one animal at a time | | proximity | records presence at a point without restricting movement | | count | proximity detector allowing >1 detection per animal per time | | polygon | counts from searching one or more areas | | transect | counts from searching one or more transects | | polygonX | binary data from mutually exclusive areas | | transectX | binary data from mutually exclusive transects | | signal | detections and signal strengths at multiple microphones | | telemetry | locations from radiotelemetry |

Outline of the package secr

The program DENSITY (Efford et al. 2004, Efford 2012) provides a graphical interface to SECR methods that was used by many biologists. However, DENSITY has significant drawbacks: it requires the Windows operating system, its algorithms are not always transparent or well-documented, it fits only homogeneous Poisson models, and it omits recent advances in SECR.

The R package secr was written to address these weaknesses and allow for further development. It implements almost all the methods described by Borchers and Efford (2008), Efford et al. (2009), Efford (2011), Efford and Fewster (2013), Efford et al. (2013) and Efford and Mowat (2014). secr 5.4 uses external C++ code via package Rcpp for computationally intensive operations (Eddelbuettel and Francois 2011); Multi-threading on multiple CPUs with RcppParallel (Allaire et al. 2021) gives major speed gains. The most important functions of secr are listed in Appendix 1.

How secr works

secr defines a set of R classes[^1] and methods for data from detector arrays and models fitted to those data.

\vspace{12pt}

Table 3. Essential classes in secr.

| Class | Data | |---------|---------------------------------------------| | traps | locations of detectors; detector type ('proximity', 'multi', etc.) | | capthist | spatial detection histories, including a 'traps' object | | mask | raster map of habitat near the detectors | | secr | fitted SECR model|

[^1]:Technically, these are S3 classes. A 'class' in R specifies a particular type of data object and the functions (methods) by which it is manipulated (computed, printed, plotted etc). See the R documentation for further explanation.

To perform an SECR analysis you explicitly or implicitly construct each of these objects in turn. Fig. 2 indicates the relationships among the classes.

\setkeys{Gin}{height=95mm, width=140mm,keepaspectratio=TRUE}

Fig. 2. Essentials of the secr package.

[^2]:Text in this font refers to R objects that are documented in online help for the secr package, or in base R.

Model fitting and estimation

Models are fitted in secr.fit by numerically maximizing the likelihood. The likelihood involves integration over the unknown locations of the animals' range centres. This is achieved in practice by summation over points in the habitat mask, which has some implications for the user. Computation may be slow, especially if there are many points in the mask, and estimates may be sensitive to the particular choice of mask (either explicitly in make.mask or implicitly via the 'buffer' argument).

The default maximization algorithm is Newton-Raphson in the function stats::nlm. By default, all reported variances, covariances, standard errors and confidence limits are asymptotic and based on a numerical estimate of the information matrix. The Newton-Raphson algorithm is fast, but it sometimes fails to compute the information matrix correctly, causing some standard errors to be set to NA; see the 'method' argument of secr.fit for alternatives. Use confint.secr for profile likelihood intervals and sim.secr for parametric bootstrap intervals (both are slow).

Habitat masks

We have already introduced the idea of a habitat mask. The SECR likelihood is evaluated by summing values at points on a mask; each point represents a grid cell of potentially occupied habitat. Masks may be constructed by placing a buffer of arbitrary width around the detectors, possibly excluding known non-habitat. How wide should the buffer be? The general answer is 'Wide enough not to cause bias in estimated densities'. This depends on the scale of movement of the animal, and on the chosen detection function. For specifics, see Efford (2025) and the help for 'mask' and the various mask-related functions (make.mask, mask.check, suggest.buffer, and esaPlot). Heavy-tailed detection functions such as the hazard-rate and lognormal can be problematic because they require an unreasonably large buffer for stable density estimates.

Input

Data input is covered in the separate document secr-datainput.pdf. One option is to use text files in the formats used by DENSITY; these accommodate most types of data. Two files are required, one of detector (trap) locations and one of the detections (captures) themselves; the function read.capthist reads both files and constructs a capthist object. It is also possible to construct the capthist object in two stages, first making a traps object (with read.traps) and a captures dataframe, and then combining these with make.capthist. This more general route may be needed for unusual datasets.

Output

The output from the function secr.fit is an object of class secr. This is an R list with many components. Assigning the output to a named object saves both the fit and the data for further manipulation. Typing the name at the R prompt invokes print.secr which formats the key results. These include the dataframe of estimates from the predict method for secr objects. Functions are provided for further computations on secr objects (e.g., AIC model selection, model averaging, profile-likelihood confidence intervals, and likelihood-ratio tests). Many of these are listed in Appendix 2.

One system of units is used throughout secr. Distances are in metres and areas are in hectares (ha). The unit of density for 2-dimensional habitat is animals per hectare. 1 ha = 10000 m^2^ = 0.01 km^2^. To convert density to animals per km^2^, multiply by 100. Density in linear habitats (see package secrlinear) is expressed in animals per km.

Documentation

The primary documentation for secr is in the help pages that accompany the package. Help for a function is obtained in the usual way by typing a question mark at the R prompt, followed by the function name. Note the 'Index' link at the bottom of each help page -- you will probably need to scroll down to find it. The index may also be accessed with help(package = secr).

The consolidated help pages are in the file secr-manual.pdf. Searching this text is a powerful way to locate a function for a particular task.

The web page https://www.otago.ac.nz/density/ should be checked for news of bug fixes and new releases. New versions will be posted on CRAN, but there may be a delay of a few days. For information on changes in each version, type at the R prompt:

news (package = "secr")

Help may be sought on the Density | secr forum at www.phidot.org. Another forum intended for both software issues and wider discussion is secrgroup.

References

Allaire, J. J., Francois, R., Ushey, K., Vandenbrouck, G., Geelnard, M. and Intel (2021) RcppParallel: Parallel Programming Tools for 'Rcpp'. R package version 5.1.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RcppParallel.

Borchers, D. L., Buckland, S. T. and Zucchini, W. (2002) Estimating animal abundance: closed populations. Springer, London.

Borchers, D. L. and Efford, M. G. (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture--recapture studies. Biometrics 64, 377--385.

Distiller, G. and Borchers, D. L. (2015) A spatially explicit capture--recapture estimator for single-catch traps. Ecology and Evolution 5, 5075--5087.

Eddelbuettel, D. and Francois, R. (2011) Rcpp: Seamless R and C++ Integration. Journal of Statistical Software 40(8), 1--18. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v40/i08/.

Efford, M. G. (2004) Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106, 598--610.

Efford, M. G. (2011) Estimation of population density by spatially explicit capture--recapture analysis of data from area searches. Ecology 92, 2202--2207.

Efford, M. G. (2012) DENSITY 5.0: software for spatially explicit capture--recapture. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand https://www.otago.ac.nz/density/.

Efford, M. G. (2023) ipsecr: An R package for awkward spatial capture--recapture data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 14, 1182--1189.

Efford, M. G. (2025) The SECR book. A handbook of spatially explicit capture–recapture methods. Version 1.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15109937 and https://murrayefford.github.io/SECRbook/.

Efford, M. G., Borchers D. L. and Byrom, A. E. (2009) Density estimation by spatially explicit capture--recapture: likelihood-based methods. In: D. L. Thomson, E. G. Cooch, M. J. Conroy (eds) Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations. Springer. Pp 255--269.

Efford, M. G., Borchers D. L. and Mowat, G. (2013) Varying effort in capture--recapture studies. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4, 629--636.

Efford, M. G., Dawson, D. K. and Borchers, D. L. (2009) Population density estimated from locations of individuals on a passive detector array. Ecology 90, 2676--2682.

Efford, M. G. and Fewster, R. M. (2013) Estimating population size by spatially explicit capture--recapture. Oikos 122, 918--928.

Efford, M. G. and Mowat, G. (2014) Compensatory heterogeneity in spatially explicit capture--recapture data. Ecology 95, 1341--1348.

Efford, M. G. and Schofield, M. R. (2020) A spatial open-population capture--recapture model. Biometrics 76, 392--402.

Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C. and Anderson, D. R. (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62.

Royle, J. A., Chandler, R. B., Sollmann, R. and Gardner, B. (2014) Spatial capture--recapture. Academic Press.

Royle, J. A. and Gardner, B. (2011) Hierarchical spatial capture--recapture models for estimating density from trapping arrays. In: A.F. O'Connell, J.D. Nichols and K.U. Karanth (eds) Camera Traps in Animal Ecology: Methods and Analyses. Springer, Tokyo. Pp. 163--190.

Royle, J. A., Nichols, J. D., Karanth, K. U. and Gopalaswamy, A. M. (2009) A hierarchical model for estimating density in camera-trap studies. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 118--127.

Royle, J. A. and Young, K. V. (2008) A hierarchical model for spatial capture--recapture data. Ecology 89, 2281--2289.

Turek, D., Milleret, C., Ergon, T., Brøseth, H., Dupont, P., Bischof, R., and Valpine, P. de. (2021) Efficient estimation of large‐scale spatial capture--recapture models.Ecosphere 12(2) https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3385

\pagebreak

Appendix 1. Core functions of secr {#appendix1}

These are the core functions of secr 5.4 -- the ones that you are most likely to use. S3 methods are marked with an asterisk.

| Function | Purpose | |-----------------|---------------------------------------------------| | addCovariates | add spatial covariates to traps or mask | | AIC | model selection, model weights | | covariates | extract or replace covariates of traps, capthist or mask | | derived | compute density from conditional likelihood models | | make.mask | construct habitat mask (= mesh) | | plot | plot capthist, traps or mask | | read.capthist | input captures and trap layout from Density format, one call | | predict | compute 'real' parameters for arbitrary levels of predictor variables | | predictDsurface | evaluate density surface at each point of a mask | | region.N | compute expected and realised population size in specified region | | secr.fit | maximum likelihood fit; result is a fitted 'secr' object | | summary | summarise capthist, traps or mask | traps | extract or replace traps object in capthist |

\pagebreak

Appendix 2. Classified index to secr functions {#appendix2}

Here is an index of secr functions classified by use (some minor functions are omitted). S3 methods are marked with an asterisk.

| Function | Purpose | |----------------------|-------------------------------------------------| | | | | Manipulate data objects | | |     addCovariates | add spatial covariates to 'traps' or 'mask' | |      as.mask | coerce 'traps' object to 'mask' for specialised plotting | |      deleteMaskPoints | edit 'mask' | |      discretize | rasterize area-search capthist data | |      head | first rows of 'capthist', 'traps' or 'mask' | |      join | combine sessions of multi-session 'capthist' object | |      make.grid | construct detector array | |      make.capthist | form 'capthist' from 'traps' and detection data | |      make.mask | construct habitat mask (mesh) | |      make.systematic | construct clustered random systematic design | |      make.lacework | construct lacework random systematic design | |      MS.capthist | combine 'capthist' objects into one multi-session 'capthist' | |      plot | plot 'capthist', 'traps' or 'mask' | |      plotMaskEdge | draw line around mask cells | |      randomHabitat | generates habitat mask with random landscape | |      rbind | append 'capthist', 'traps', 'popn' or 'mask' objects | |      read.capthist | input captures and trap layout from Density format, one call | |      read.traps | input detector locations from text file | |      reduce | aggregate detectors or occasions; change detector type | |      sim.capthist | simulate capture histories | |      sightingPlot | bubble plot of sightings in capthist object | |      snip | split transect(s) into equal sections | |      split | split a single-session capthist or mask by various criteria | |      subset | filter 'capthist', 'traps' or 'mask' | |      summary | summarise 'capthist', 'traps' or 'mask' | |      tail | last rows of 'capthist', 'traps' or 'mask' | |      trap.builder | construct various complex designs | |      verify | check 'capthist', 'traps' or 'mask' for internal consistency | | | | | Attributes of traps object | | |      clusterID | cluster identifier | |      clustertrap | detector number within cluster | |      covariates | detector-level covariates | |      detector | detector type ('multi', 'proximity' etc.) | |      markocc | vector distinguishing marking and sighting occasions | |      polyID | polygon or transect identifier | |      timevaryingcov | name time-varying covariate(s) | |      usage | occasion- and detector-specific effort | | | | | Attributes of capthist object | | |      addSightings | add sighting data to a 'proximity', 'count' or 'polygon' object | |      addTelemetry | add telemetry data to a 'proximity' or 'count' object | |      covariates | individual-level covariates, including grouping factors | |      session | session identifier(s) | |      signalmatrix | sound x microphone table | |      telemetryxy | coordinates of telemetry fixes | |      Tm | counts of marked animals that were not identified | |      traps | embedded traps object(s) | |      Tu | counts of unmarked animals | | | | | Data for each detection | | |      alive | TRUE/FALSE | |      animalID | individual ID | |      clusterID | cluster identifier | |      clustertrap | detector number within cluster | |      noise | noise (signal detectors) | |      occasion | occasion | |      signal | signal strength (signal detectors) | |      signalframe | whole signal \| noise dataframe (rows = detections) | |      trap | detector | |      xy | detection coordinates (polygon and transect detectors)| | | | | Fit SECR model(s) | | |      list.secr.fit | fit several models and return secrlist object | |      secr.fit | maximum likelihood fit; result is a fitted secr object | | | | | Operate on fitted model(s) | | |      adjustVarD | apply c-hat to density SE and confidence intervals | |      AIC | model selection, model weights | |      chat.nj | overdispersion of activity centres | |      coef | 'beta' parameters | |      collate | tabulate estimates from several models | |      confint | profile likelihood confidence intervals | |      CVa, CVa0 | CV of individual detection from fitted mixture model | |      derived | density from conditional likelihood models | |      deviance | model deviance | |      df.residual | degrees of freedom for deviance | |      derivednj | variance from replicated sampling units | |      derivedCluster | variance from replicated sampling units | |      derivedDcoef | derive intercept and other coefficients from relative density model | |      derivedDsurface | derive absolute density surface from relative density model | |      derivedExternal | variance from replicated sampling units | |      ellipse.secr | confidence ellipses for estimated parameters | |      esa | effective sampling area by individual | |      fxi | probability density of home-range centre | |      LLsurface | compute likelihood surface and plot contours | |      logLik | log-likelihood of fitted model | |      LR.test | likelihood-ratio test of two models | |      MCgof | Monte Carlo goodness-of-fit after Choo et al. 2024 | |      modelAverage | combine estimates using AIC or AICc weights | |      plot | plot detection functions with confidence bands | |      predict | 'real' parameters for arbitrary levels of predictor variables | |      predictDsurface | evaluate density surface at each point of a mask | |      region.N | expected and realised population size in specified region | |      RSE | extract precision (relative SE) of 'real' parameter estimates | |      score.test | model selection with score statistic using observed information | |      secr.test | Monte Carlo goodness-of-fit tests | |      simulate | generate realisations of fitted model | |      sim.secr | parametric bootstrap | |      vcov | variance-covariance matrix of 'beta' or 'real' parameters | | | | | Mask diagnostics | | |      esaPlot | cumulative plot esa or $\hat D$ vs buffer width | |      mask.check | likelihood or estimates vs. buffer width and spacing |[6pt] |      suggest.buffer | find buffer width to keep bias within bounds | | | | | Specialised graphics | | |      bufferContour | concave and convex boundary strips | |      fxTotal | summed pdfs of home-range centre pdfs (use with plot.Dsurface) | |      fxiContour | contour plot of home-range centre pdf(s) | |      pdotContour | contour plot of detection probability | |      strip.legend | add colour legend to existing plot | | | | | Convert or export data | | |      RMarkInput | convert 'capthist' to dataframe for RMark | |      write.capthist | export 'capthist' as text files for DENSITY | |      write.DA | convert 'capthist' for analysis in WinBUGS | |      writeGPS | upload coordinates to GPS using GPSBabel | | | | | Miscellaneous | | |      ARL | asymptotic range length| |      autoini | generate starting values of D, g0 and sigma for secr.fit | |      centroids | centroid of each animal's detections | |      clone | replicate points to emulate overdispersion | |      closure.test | closure tests of Otis et al. (1978) and Stanley \| Burnham (1999) | |      closedN | closed population size by various conventional estimators | |      counts | summary data from 'capthist' object | |      CV | coefficient of variation | |      dbar | mean distance between capture locations | |      distancetotrap | from an arbitrary set of points | |      edist | Euclidean distance | |      Enk | expected individuals per detector | |      gridCells | grid cells around points (e.g. traps object) | |      kfn | overlap index for halfnormal home range | |      MMDM | mean maximum distance moved | |      moves | distances between capture locations | |      nearesttrap | from an arbitrary set of points | |      nedist | Non-Euclidean distance | |      ORL | observed range length| |      pdot | location-specific net probability of detection | |      PG | proportion of telemetry fixes in given polygons | |      pmixProfileLL | profile likelihood as function of mixing proportion | |      RPSV | 'root pooled spatial variance', a simple measure of home-range size | |      setNumThreads | sets environment variable RCPP_PARALLEL_NUM_THREADS | |      t2r2 | serial correlation of detection locations | |      trapsPerAnimal | frequency distribution of detectors per animal |



Try the secr package in your browser

Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.

secr documentation built on Feb. 24, 2026, 9:07 a.m.