Description Details Author(s) References Examples
Publication bias, the fact that studies identified for inclusion in a meta analysis do not represent all studies on the topic of interest, is commonly recognized as a threat to the validity of the results of a meta analysis. One way to explicitly model publication bias is via selection models or weighted probability distributions. For details we refer to Iyengar & Greenhouse (1998), Dear & Begg (1992), and Rufibach (2011). In this package we provide implementations of all the weight functions proposed in these papers. The novelty in Rufibach (2011) is the proposal of a non-increasing variant of the nonparametric weight function of Dear & Begg (1992). Since virtually all parametric weight functions proposed so far in the literature are in fact decreasing and only few studies are included in a typical meta analysis regularization by imposing monotonicity seems a sensible approach. The new approach potentially offers more insight in the selection process than other methods, but is more flexible than parametric approaches. To maximize the log-likelihood function proposed by Dear & Begg (1992) under a monotonicity constraint on w we use a differential evolution algorithm proposed by Ardia et al (2010a, b) and implemented in Mullen et al (2009).
The main functions in this package are IyenGreen
and DearBegg
.
Using DearBeggMonotoneCItheta
one can compute a profile likelihood confidence interval for the overall effect size θ
and using DearBeggMonotonePvalSelection
the simulation-based p-value to assess the null hypothesis of no selection, as
described in Rufibach (2011, Section 6), can be computed. In addition, we provide two datasets:
education
, a dataset frequently used in illustration of meta analysis and passive_smoking
, a second dataset
that has caused some controversy about whether publication bias is present in this dataset or not.
Package: | selectMeta |
Type: | Package |
Version: | 1.0.8 |
Date: | 2015-07-03 |
License: | GPL (>=2) |
Kaspar Rufibach (maintainer), kaspar.rufibach@gmail.com,
http://www.kasparrufibach.ch
Ardia, D., Boudt, K., Carl, P., Mullen, K.M., Peterson, B.G. (2010). Differential Evolution ('DEoptim') for Non-Convex Portfolio Optimization.
Ardia, D., Mullen, K.M., et.al. (2010). The 'DEoptim' Package: Differential Evolution Optimization in 'R'. Version 2.0-7.
Dear, K.B.G. and Begg, C.B. (1992). An Approach for Assessing Publication Bias Prior to Performing a Meta-Analysis. Statist. Sci., 7(2), 237–245.
Hedges, L. and Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic, Orlando, Florida.
Iyengar, S. and Greenhouse, J.B. (1988). Selection models and the file drawer problem. Statist. Sci., 3, 109–135.
Mullen, K.M., Ardia, D., Gil, D.L., Windover, D., Cline, J. (2009). 'DEoptim': An 'R' Package for Global Optimization by Differential Evolution.
Rufibach, K. (2011). Selection Models with Monotone Weight Functions in Meta-Analysis. Biom. J., 53(4), 689–704.
1 2 | # All functions in this package are illustrated
# in the help file for the function DearBegg().
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.