norm_chisq | R Documentation |
A quantitative comparison between the predicted and observed directions of
\sigma_{Hmax}
is obtained by the calculation of the average
azimuth and by a normalized \chi^2
test.
norm_chisq(obs, prd, unc)
obs |
Numeric vector containing the observed azimuth of
|
prd |
Numeric vector containing the modeled azimuths of
|
unc |
Uncertainty of observed |
The normalized \chi^2
test is
{Norm} \chi^2_i =
= \frac{
\sum^M_{i = 1} \left( \frac{\alpha_i - \alpha_{{predict}}}{\sigma_i}
\right) ^2}
{\sum^M_{i = 1} \left( \frac{90}{\sigma_i} \right) ^2 }
The value of the chi-squared test statistic is a number between 0 and 1
indicating the quality of the predicted \sigma_{Hmax}
directions. Low values
(\le 0.15
) indicate good agreement,
high values (> 0.7
) indicate a systematic misfit between predicted and
observed \sigma_{Hmax}
directions.
Numeric vector
Wdowinski, S., 1998, A theory of intraplate tectonics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 103, 5037-5059, doi: 10.1029/97JB03390.
data("nuvel1")
PoR <- subset(nuvel1, nuvel1$plate.rot == "na") # North America relative to
# Pacific plate
data(san_andreas)
point <- data.frame(lat = 45, lon = 20)
prd <- model_shmax(point, PoR)
norm_chisq(obs = c(50, 40, 42), prd$sc, unc = c(10, NA, 5))
data(san_andreas)
prd2 <- PoR_shmax(san_andreas, PoR, type = "right")
norm_chisq(obs = prd2$azi.PoR, 135, unc = san_andreas$unc)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.