The strength of evidence provided by epidemiological and observational studies is inherently limited by the potential for unmeasured confounding. We focus on three key quantities: the observed bound of the confidence interval closest to the null, the relationship between an unmeasured confounder and the outcome, for example a plausible residual effect size for an unmeasured continuous or binary confounder, and the relationship between an unmeasured confounder and the exposure, for example a realistic mean difference or prevalence difference for this hypothetical confounder between exposure groups. Building on the methods put forth by Cornfield et al. (1959), Bross (1966), Schlesselman (1978), Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983), Lin et al. (1998), Lash et al. (2009), Rosenbaum (1986), Cinelli & Hazlett (2020), VanderWeele & Ding (2017), and Ding & VanderWeele (2016), we can use these quantities to assess how an unmeasured confounder may tip our result to insignificance.
Package details |
|
---|---|
Author | Lucy D'Agostino McGowan [aut, cre] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6983-2759>), Malcolm Barrett [aut] (<https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0299-5825>) |
Maintainer | Lucy D'Agostino McGowan <lucydagostino@gmail.com> |
License | MIT + file LICENSE |
Version | 1.0.2 |
URL | https://r-causal.github.io/tipr/ https://github.com/r-causal/tipr |
Package repository | View on CRAN |
Installation |
Install the latest version of this package by entering the following in R:
|
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.