The strength of evidence provided by epidemiological and observational studies is inherently limited by the potential for unmeasured confounding. We focus on three key quantities: the observed bound of the confidence interval closest to the null, a plausible residual effect size for an unmeasured continuous or binary confounder, and a realistic mean difference or prevalence difference for this hypothetical confounder. Building on the methods put forth by Lin, Psaty, & Kronmal (1998) <doi:10.2307/2533848>, we can use these quantities to assess how an unmeasured confounder may tip our result to insignificance, rendering the study inconclusive.
|Author||Lucy D'Agostino McGowan|
|Maintainer||Lucy D'Agostino McGowan <email@example.com>|
|License||MIT + file LICENSE|
|Package repository||View on CRAN|
Install the latest version of this package by entering the following in R:
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.