Description Usage Arguments Details Value Examples
Compute ICCs for three-level meta-analysis Note that the ICC formulation for three-level models is described in \insertCitecheung2014modeling;textualblsmeta. It is defined as the heterogeneity at each level divided by the total heterogeneity, which will approach I2 when the sampling variances approach zero (large n).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
object |
An object of class |
newdata_scale2 |
An optional data.frame for which to compute
predictions for the level 2 variance component.
Defaults to |
newdata_scale3 |
An optional data.frame for which to compute
predictions for the level 3 variance component.
Defaults to |
cred |
numeric. credible interval (defaults to |
summary |
logical. Should the posterior samples be summarized
(defaults to |
percent |
logical. Should the results be percentages, as in metafor
(defaults to |
digits |
numeric. The desired number of digits for the summarized
estimates (defaults to |
In essence, with a scale model, this results in the
ICCs being a function of moderators. Further, rather than one
ICC, there is an ICC for each of the k
studies.
For more information about varying ICCs,
we refer interested users to \insertCitewilliams2019putting;textualblsmeta
and \insertCitewilliams2020fineblsmeta.
A list of two data frames of predicted values.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.