Description Usage Arguments Value References Examples
Adjusted exploitation compensates for lack of angler- reporting (i.e., via reporting rate), tag loss, and mortality due to tagging. If tag loss or tagging mortality are unknown, values from literature can be used.
μ\prime=\frac{μ}{(repRate \times (1-tagL) \times (1-tagM))}
1  | Exploitation(rr, rt, repRate, tagL, tagM)
 | 
rr | 
 Number of non-reward tags reported (positive integer).  | 
rt | 
 Number of non-reward tags released (positive integer).  | 
repRate | 
 Reporting rate   | 
tagL | 
 Fraction of tags lost (default ??).  | 
tagM | 
 Mortality (as a fraction) from tagging (default ??).  | 
List containing number returned, number released (tagged), reporting rate, raw exploitation rate mu, and adjusted exploitation rate μ\prime.
Kevin A. Meyer & Daniel J. Schill (2014) Use of a Statewide Angler Tag Reporting System to Estimate Rates of Exploitation and Total Mortality for Idaho Sport Fisheries, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 34:6, 1145-1158, DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2014.951803
1 2  | # numbers for example only
Exploitation(rr = 5, rt = 175, repRate = 0.5, tagL = 0.05, tagM = 0.05)
 | 
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.