Description Usage Arguments Value Note References Examples
In mark-recapture studies, anglers are encouraged to return tags to the issuing entity. A mixture of non-reward tags and high-value reward tags typically are released to ensure returns. Not all anglers return tags (non-reporting), and the reporting rate adjusts for non-reporting.
1 | ReportingRate(rr, rt, nr, nt)
|
rr |
Number of non-reward tags reported (positive integer). |
rt |
Number of non-reward tags released (positive integer). |
nr |
Number of high-reward tags reported (positive integer). |
nt |
Number of high-reward tags released (positive integer). |
List containing reporting rate and reporting rate variance.
In the case of CDFW sturgeon mark-recapture, all tags released are reward tags. We assume, then, a reporting rate of 100 the highest value reward.
Kevin A. Meyer & Daniel J. Schill (2014) Use of a Statewide Angler Tag Reporting System to Estimate Rates of Exploitation and Total Mortality for Idaho Sport Fisheries, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 34:6, 1145-1158, DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2014.951803
1 2 | # numbers for example only
ReportingRate(rr = 5, rt = 175, nr = 10, nt = 175)
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.