In keyes-timothy/tidytof: Analyze High-dimensional Cytometry Data Using Tidy Data Principles

knitr::opts_chunk$set(
    collapse = TRUE,
    comment = "#>"
)

library(tidytof)
library(dplyr)
library(stringr)
library(ggplot2)
library(tidyr)
library(forcats)

After clusters are identified, many cytometrists want to use statistical tools to rigorously quantify which clusters(s) in their dataset associate with a particular experimental or clinical variable.

Such analyses are often grouped under the umbrella term differential discovery analysis and include both comparing the relative size of clusters between experimental conditions (differential abundance analysis; DAA) as well as comparing marker expression patterns of clusters between experimental conditions (differential expression analysis; DEA). {tidytof} provides the tof_analyze_abundance() and tof_analyze_expression() verbs for differential abundance and differential expression analyses, respectively.

Accessing the data for this vignette

To demonstrate how to use these verbs, we'll first download a dataset originally collected for the development of the CITRUS algorithm. These data are available in the {HDCytoData} package, which is available on Bioconductor and can be downloaded with the following command:

if (!requireNamespace("BiocManager", quietly = TRUE)) {
    install.packages("BiocManager")
}

BiocManager::install("HDCytoData")

To load the CITRUS data into our current R session, we can call a function from the {HDCytoData}, which will provide it to us in a format from the {flowCore} package (called a "flowSet"). To convert this into a tidy tibble, we can use {tidytof} built-in method for converting flowCore objects into tof_tbl's .

citrus_raw <- HDCytoData::Bodenmiller_BCR_XL_flowSet()

citrus_data <-
    citrus_raw |>
    as_tof_tbl(sep = "_")

Thus, we can see that citrus_data is a tof_tbl with r nrow(citrus_data) cells (one in each row) and r ncol(citrus_data) pieces of information about each cell (one in each column).

We can also extract some metadata from the raw data and join it with our single-cell data using some functions from the tidyverse:

citrus_metadata <-
    tibble(
        file_name = as.character(flowCore::pData(citrus_raw)[[1]]),
        sample_id = 1:length(file_name),
        patient = stringr::str_extract(file_name, "patient[:digit:]"),
        stimulation = stringr::str_extract(file_name, "(BCR-XL)|Reference")
    ) |>
    mutate(
        stimulation = if_else(stimulation == "Reference", "Basal", stimulation)
    )

citrus_metadata |>
    head()

Thus, we now have sample-level information about which patient each sample was collected from and which stimulation condition ("Basal" or "BCR-XL") each sample was exposed to before data acquisition.

Finally, we can join this metadata with our single-cell tof_tbl to obtain the cleaned dataset.

citrus_data <-
    citrus_data |>
    left_join(citrus_metadata, by = "sample_id")

After these data cleaning steps, we now have citrus_data, a tof_tbl containing cells collected from 8 patients. Specifically, 2 samples were taken from each patient: one in which the cells' B-cell receptors were stimulated (BCR-XL) and one in which they were not (Basal). In citrus_data, each cell's patient of origin is stored in the patient column, and each cell's stimulation condition is stored in the stimulation column. In addition, the population_id column stores information about cluster labels that were applied to each cell using a combination of FlowSOM clustering and manual merging (for details, run ?HDCytoData::Bodenmiller_BCR_XL in the R console).

Differential abundance analysis using tof_analyze_abundance()

We might wonder if there are certain clusters that expand or deplete within patients between the two stimulation conditions described above - this is a question that requires differential abundance analysis (DAA). {tidytof}'s tof_analyze_abundance() verb supports the use of 3 statistical approaches for performing DAA: diffcyt, generalized-linear mixed modeling (GLMMs), and simple t-tests. Because the setup described above uses a paired design and only has 2 experimental conditions of interest (Basal vs. BCR-XL), we can use the paired t-test method:

daa_result <-
    citrus_data |>
    tof_analyze_abundance(
        cluster_col = population_id,
        effect_col = stimulation,
        group_cols = patient,
        test_type = "paired",
        method = "ttest"
    )

daa_result

Based on this output, we can see that 6 of our 8 clusters have statistically different abundance in our two stimulation conditions. Using {tidytof} easy integration with {tidyverse} packages, we can use this result to visualize the fold-changes of each cluster (within each patient) in the BCR-XL condition compared to the Basal condition using {ggplot2}:

plot_data <-
    citrus_data |>
    mutate(population_id = as.character(population_id)) |>
    left_join(
        select(daa_result, population_id, significant, mean_fc),
        by = "population_id"
    ) |>
    dplyr::count(patient, stimulation, population_id, significant, mean_fc, name = "n") |>
    group_by(patient, stimulation) |>
    mutate(prop = n / sum(n)) |>
    ungroup() |>
    pivot_wider(
        names_from = stimulation,
        values_from = c(prop, n),
    ) |>
    mutate(
        diff = `prop_BCR-XL` - prop_Basal,
        fc = `prop_BCR-XL` / prop_Basal,
        population_id = fct_reorder(population_id, diff),
        direction =
            case_when(
                mean_fc > 1 & significant == "*" ~ "increase",
                mean_fc < 1 & significant == "*" ~ "decrease",
                TRUE ~ NA_character_
            )
    )

significance_data <-
    plot_data |>
    group_by(population_id, significant, direction) |>
    summarize(diff = max(diff), fc = max(fc)) |>
    ungroup()

plot_data |>
    ggplot(aes(x = population_id, y = fc, fill = direction)) +
    geom_violin(trim = FALSE) +
    geom_hline(yintercept = 1, color = "red", linetype = "dotted", size = 0.5) +
    geom_point() +
    geom_text(
        aes(x = population_id, y = fc, label = significant),
        data = significance_data,
        size = 8,
        nudge_x = 0.2,
        nudge_y = 0.06
    ) +
    scale_x_discrete(labels = function(x) str_c("cluster ", x)) +
    scale_fill_manual(
        values = c("decrease" = "#cd5241", "increase" = "#207394"),
        na.translate = FALSE
    ) +
    labs(
        x = NULL,
        y = "Abundance fold-change (stimulated / basal)",
        fill = "Effect",
        caption = "Asterisks indicate significance at an adjusted p-value of 0.05"
    )

Importantly, the output of tof_analyze_abundance depends slightly on the underlying statistical method being used, and details can be found in the documentation for each tof_analyze_abundance_* function family member:

• tof_analyze_abundance_diffcyt
• tof_analyze_abundance_glmm
• tof_analyze_abundance_ttest

Differential expression analysis with tof_analyze_expression()

Similarly, suppose we're interested in how intracellular signaling proteins change their expression levels between our two stimulation conditions in each of our clusters. This is a Differential Expression Analysis (DEA) and can be performed using {tidytof}'s tof_analyze_expression verb. As above, we can use paired t-tests with multiple-hypothesis correction to to test for significant differences in each cluster's expression of our signaling markers between stimulation conditions.

signaling_markers <-
    c(
        "pNFkB_Nd142", "pStat5_Nd150", "pAkt_Sm152", "pStat1_Eu153", "pStat3_Gd158",
        "pSlp76_Dy164", "pBtk_Er166", "pErk_Er168", "pS6_Yb172", "pZap70_Gd156"
    )

dea_result <-
    citrus_data |>
    tof_preprocess(channel_cols = any_of(signaling_markers)) |>
    tof_analyze_expression(
        method = "ttest",
        cluster_col = population_id,
        marker_cols = any_of(signaling_markers),
        effect_col = stimulation,
        group_cols = patient,
        test_type = "paired"
    )

dea_result |>
    head()

While the output of tof_analyze_expression() also depends on the underlying test being used, we can see that the result above looks relatively similar to the output from tof_analyze_abundance(). Above, the output is a tibble in which each row represents the differential expression results from a single cluster-marker pair - for example, the first row represents the difference in expression of pS6 in cluster 1 between the BCR-XL and Basal conditions. Each row includes the raw p-value and multiple-hypothesis-corrected p-value for each cluster-marker pair.

This result can be used to make a volcano plot to visualize the results for all cluster-marker pairs:

volcano_data <-
    dea_result |>
    mutate(
        log2_fc = log(mean_fc, base = 2),
        log_p = -log(p_adj),
        significance =
            case_when(
                p_adj < 0.05 & mean_fc > 1 ~ "increased",
                p_adj < 0.05 & mean_fc < 1 ~ "decreased",
                TRUE ~ NA_character_
            ),
        marker =
            str_extract(marker, ".+_") |>
                str_remove("_"),
        pair = str_c(marker, str_c("cluster ", population_id), sep = "@")
    )

volcano_data |>
    ggplot(aes(x = log2_fc, y = log_p, fill = significance)) +
    geom_vline(xintercept = 0, linetype = "dashed", color = "gray50") +
    geom_hline(yintercept = -log(0.05), linetype = "dashed", color = "red") +
    geom_point(shape = 21, size = 2) +
    ggrepel::geom_text_repel(
        aes(label = pair),
        data = slice_head(volcano_data, n = 10L),
        size = 2
    ) +
    scale_fill_manual(
        values = c("decreased" = "#cd5241", "increased" = "#207394"),
        na.value = "#cdcdcd"
    ) +
    labs(
        x = "log2(Fold-change)",
        y = "-log10(p-value)",
        fill = NULL,
        caption = "Labels indicate the 10 most significant marker-cluster pairs"
    )

As above, details can be found in the documentation for each tof_analyze_expression_* function family member:

• tof_analyze_expression_diffcyt
• tof_analyze_expression_lmm
• tof_analyze_expression_ttest

Session info

sessionInfo()

keyes-timothy/tidytof documentation built on May 7, 2024, 12:33 p.m.