Description Usage Arguments Details Value Examples
1 2 3 4 5 | create_polymer(x)
run_polymer_reaction(x, verbose = FALSE)
simulate_polymer_reactions(x)
|
x |
a string describing a polymer |
verbose |
whether to print out the each step of the polymer simulation |
Part One
You've managed to sneak in to the prototype suit manufacturing lab. The Elves are making decent progress, but are still struggling with the suit's size reduction capabilities.
While the very latest in 1518 alchemical technology might have solved their problem eventually, you can do better. You scan the chemical composition of the suit's material and discover that it is formed by extremely long polymers (one of which is [available]title="I've always wanted a polymer!" as your puzzle input).
The polymer is formed by smaller units which, when triggered, react
with each other such that two adjacent units of the same type and
opposite polarity are destroyed. Units' types are represented by
letters; units' polarity is represented by capitalization. For instance,
r
and R
are units with the same type but opposite polarity, whereas
r
and s
are entirely different types and do not react.
For example:
In aA
, a
and A
react, leaving nothing behind.
In abBA
, bB
destroys itself, leaving aA
. As above, this then
destroys itself, leaving nothing.
In abAB
, no two adjacent units are of the same type, and so
nothing happens.
In aabAAB
, even though aa
and AA
are of the same type, their
polarities match, and so nothing happens.
Now, consider a larger example, dabAcCaCBAcCcaDA
:
1 2 3 4 |
After all possible reactions, the resulting polymer contains 10 units.
How many units remain after fully reacting the polymer you scanned? [(Note: in this puzzle and others, the input is large; if you copy/paste your input, make sure you get the whole thing.)].quiet
Part Two
Time to improve the polymer.
One of the unit types is causing problems; it's preventing the polymer from collapsing as much as it should. Your goal is to figure out which unit type is causing the most problems, remove all instances of it (regardless of polarity), fully react the remaining polymer, and measure its length.
For example, again using the polymer dabAcCaCBAcCcaDA
from above:
Removing all A
/a
units produces dbcCCBcCcD
. Fully reacting
this polymer produces dbCBcD
, which has length 6.
Removing all B
/b
units produces daAcCaCAcCcaDA
. Fully reacting
this polymer produces daCAcaDA
, which has length 8.
Removing all C
/c
units produces dabAaBAaDA
. Fully reacting
this polymer produces daDA
, which has length 4.
Removing all D
/d
units produces abAcCaCBAcCcaA
. Fully reacting
this polymer produces abCBAc
, which has length 6.
In this example, removing all C
/c
units was best, producing the
answer 4.
What is the length of the shortest polymer you can produce by removing all units of exactly one type and fully reacting the result?
For Part One, create_polymer(x)
returns a polymer object that can
run a reaction. run_polymer_reaction(x)
returns the polymer after all
reactions are finished. For Part Two, simulate_polymer_reactions(x)
returns a list with the length of the polymer after removing each unit and
letting the resulting polymer react.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | p <- create_polymer("dabAcCaCBAcCcaDA")
p$run_reaction()
# or
run_polymer_reaction("dabAcCaCBAcCcaDA")
run_polymer_reaction("dabAcCaCBAcCcaDA", verbose = TRUE)
simulate_polymer_reactions(x)
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.