library(forecast)
memory.limit(size=16000)
## Prepare the data for the analysis:
## estimate the trend and seasonality via Fourier regression
Y <- Hohenpeissenberg
tt = 1:length(Y)
year.lm = lm(Y ~ (tt + fourier(Y, 4)))
Y.mean <- ts(fitted(year.lm), f = 365, start=c(1985,1,1))
## demean the data
Y.norm = ts(Y - Y.mean, f = 365, start=c(1985,1,1))
L <- length(Y.norm)
## define the parameters to be set by the user:
## (1) the maximum model order to be used for the stationary and for the
## locally stationary approach
p_max <- 10
## (2) the set of potential segment lengths \mathcal{N};
## i.e., which N to compute the predictions for
Ns <- c(0,seq(365,ceiling(L^(4/5))))
## (3) the maximum forecasting horizon
H <- 5
## (4) and the size of the validation and test set;
## also used for the "final part of the training set"
m <- 365
## from which we obtain the end indices of the four sets
m0 <- L - 3*m # 10585
m1 <- L - 2*m # 10950
m2 <- L - m # 11315
m3 <- L # 11680
## We could show the observations from the
# Y.norm[(m0+1):m1] # final part of the training set,
# Y.norm[(m1+1):m2] # the validation set and
# Y.norm[(m2+1):m3] # the test set, respectively.
## now, compute all the linear prediction coefficients needed
coef0 <- predCoef(Y.norm, p_max, H, (m0-H+1):(m3-1), Ns)
## then, compute the MSPE on the final part of the training set
mspe <- MSPE(Y.norm, coef0, m0+1, m1, p_max, H, Ns)
## compute the minima for all N >= N_min
N_min <- min(Ns[Ns != 0])
M <- mspe$mspe
N <- mspe$N
res_e <- matrix(0, nrow = H, ncol = 5)
for (h in 1:H) {
res_e[h, 1] <- idx1_s <- which(M[h, , N == 0] == min(M[h, , N == 0]), arr.ind = TRUE)[1]
res_e[h, 2] <- min(M[h, , N == 0])
idx1_ls <- which(M[h, , N != 0 & N >= N_min] == min(M[h, , N != 0 & N >= N_min]), arr.ind = TRUE)[1,]
res_e[h, 3] <- idx1_ls[1]
res_e[h, 4] <- N[N != 0 & N >= N_min][idx1_ls[2]]
res_e[h, 5] <- min(M[h, , N != 0 & N >= N_min])
}
## Top rows from Table 6 in Kley et al. (2017)
res_e
## compute the MSPE of the null predictor
vr <- sum(Y.norm[(m0 + 1):m1]^2) / (m1 - m0)
## Top plot from Figure 6 in Kley et al. (2017)
plot(mspe, N_min = N_min, h = 1, add.for.legend=200)
## vr in previous plot not shown, because substantially
## larger: plot with vr looks like this
plot(mspe, vr = vr, N_min = N_min, h = 1, add.for.legend=200)
## Bottom plot from Figure 6 in Kley et al. (2017)
plot(mspe, N_min = N_min, h = 2, add.for.legend=200)
## compute MSPE on the validation set
mspe <- MSPE(Y.norm, coef0, m1 + 1, m2, p_max, H, Ns)
M <- mspe$mspe
N <- mspe$N
## Compare the stationary approach with the locally stationary approach,
## both for the optimally chosen p_s and (p_ls, N_ls) that achieved the
## minimal MSPE on the final part of the training set.
res_v <- matrix(0, nrow = H, ncol = 3)
for (h in 1:H) {
res_v[h, 1] <- M[h, res_e[h, 1], N == 0]
res_v[h, 2] <- M[h, res_e[h, 3], N == res_e[h, 4]]
res_v[h, 3] <- res_v[h, 1] / res_v[h, 2]
}
## compute MSPE on the validation set
mspe <- MSPE(Y.norm, coef0, m2 + 1, m3, p_max, H, Ns)
M <- mspe$mspe
N <- mspe$N
## Compare the stationary approach with the locally stationary approach,
## both for the optimally chosen p_s and (p_ls, N_ls) that achieved the
## minimal MSPE on the final part of the training set.
res_t <- matrix(0, nrow = H, ncol = 3)
for (h in 1:H) {
res_t[h, 1] <- M[h, res_e[h, 1], N == 0]
res_t[h, 2] <- M[h, res_e[h, 3], N == res_e[h, 4]]
res_t[h, 3] <- res_t[h, 1] / res_t[h, 2]
}
## Bottom rows from Table 6 in Kley et al. (2017)
cbind(res_v, res_t)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.