CT | R Documentation |
CT for ruling out clinically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in adults with suspected or known CAD. The accuracy and clinical value of CT was assessed in this meta-analysis.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science searches from inception through 2 June 2009 and bibliographies of reviews. Prospective English- or German-language studies that compared CT or MRI with conventional coronary angiography in all patients and included sufficient data for compilation of 2 x 2 tables. Two investigators independently extracted patient and study characteristics; differences were resolved by consensus. 89 studies comprising 7516 assessed the diagnostic value of CT.
data("CT")
A data frame consisting of 91 data sets (rows) and 10 attributes (columns)
Variable Names in order from left to right:
Author
Year
true positive
False positive
False negative
True negative
logit-true positive rate
logit-true negative rate
Variance of logit TPR
Variance of logit TPR
Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M. Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 2;152(3):167-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-3-201002020-00008.
#Use the EM-algorithm for a diagnostic meta-analysis based on a mixture
#of bivariate normal densities.
#Here fixed study specific variances are calculated based on logit
#transformed sensitivity and specificity.
data(CT)
p2 <- c(0.4,0.6)
lamlog12 <- c(2.93,3.22)
lamlog22 <- c(2.5,1.5)
m0 <- bivariate.EM(obs1=logitTPR,obs2=logitTNR,
var1=varlogitTPR,var2=varlogitTNR,
type="meta",lambda1=lamlog12,lambda2=lamlog22,
p=p2,data=CT,class="FALSE")
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.