Description Usage Arguments Details Value Note Author(s) References See Also Examples
Simulates a posterior of impulse response functions (IRF) by
Monte Carlo integration. This can handle Bayesian and frequentist
VARs and Bayesian (structural) VARs estimated with the szbvar
,
szbsvar
or reduced.form.var
functions. The decomposition of the
contemporaneous innovations is handled by a Cholesky decomposition of
the error covariance matrix in reduced form (B)VAR object, or for the
contemporaneous structure in S-VAR models. Simulations of IRFs
from the Bayesian model utilize the posterior estimates for that model.
1 2 |
varobj |
VAR objects for a fitted VAR model from either
|
nsteps |
Number of periods over which to compute the impulse responses |
draws |
Number of draws for the simulation of the posterior
distribution of the IRFs (if not a |
A0.posterior |
Posterior sample objects generated by
|
sign.list |
A list of signs (length = number of variables) for normalization given as either 1 or -1. |
VAR/BVAR:
Draws a set of posterior samples from the VAR coefficients and computes impulse responses for each sample. These samples can then be summarized to compute MCMC-based estimates of the responses using the error band methods described in Sims and Zha (1999).
B-SVAR:
Generates a set of N2
draws from the impulse responses for the
Bayesian SVAR model in varobj
. The function takes as its
arguments the posterior moments of the B-SVAR model in varobj
,
the draws of the contemporaneous structural coefficients
A(0) from gibbs.A0
, and a list of signs for
normalization. This function then computes a posterior sample of the
impulse responses based on the Schur product of the sign list and the
draws of A(0) and draws from the normal posterior pdf for
the other coefficients in the model.
The computations are done using compiled C++ code as of version 0.3.0. See the package source code for details about the implementation.
MSBVAR:
Computes a set of regime specific impulse responses. There will be h of the m x m responses, per the discussion above (shocks in columns, equations / responses in rows. The default is for these to be presented serially. Finally, a regime averaged set of responses, based on the ergodic probability of being in each regime is presented as the "long run" responses. At present this is experimental and open to changes.
VAR/BVAR:
An mc.irf.VAR
or mc.irf.BVAR
class
object object that is the array of
impulse response samples for the Monte Carlo samples
impulse |
draws X nsteps X (m*m) array of the impulse responses |
B-SVAR:
mc.irf.BSVAR
object which is an (N2, nsteps, m^2) array of the impulse
responses for the associated B-SVAR model in varobj
and the posterior
A(0).
MS-BVAR
mc.irf.MSBVAR
object which is a list of two arrays. The first
array are (N2, nsteps, m^2, h) array of the short-run, regime
specific impulse shock-response combinations. The second array are
the regime averaged, long run responses based on the ergodic regime
probabilities. This second list item is an array of dimensions
(N2, nsteps, m^2).
Users need to think carefully about the number of steps and the
size of the posterior sample in A(0), since enough memory
needs to be available to store and process the posterior of the
impulse responses. The number of bytes consumed by the impulse
responses will be approximately m^2 x nsteps x N2 x 16 where N2
is the number of
draws of A(0) from the gibbs.A0
. Be sure
you have enough memory available to store the object you create!
Patrick T. Brandt
Brandt, Patrick T. and John R. Freeman. 2006. "Advances in Bayesian Time Series Modeling and the Study of Politics: Theory Testing, Forecasting, and Policy Analysis" Political Analysis 14(1):1-36.
Sims, C.A. and Tao Zha. 1999. "Error Bands for Impulse Responses." Econometrica 67(5): 1113-1156.
Hamilton, James. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Chapter 11.
Waggoner, Daniel F. and Tao A. Zha. 2003. "A Gibbs sampler for structural vector autoregressions" Journal of Economic Dynamics \& Control. 28:349–366.
See also as plot.mc.irf
for plotting methods
and error band construction for the posterior of these impulse response
functions, szbsvar
for estimation of the
posterior moments of the B-SVAR model, gibbs.A0
for drawing posterior samples of A(0) for the B-SVAR model
before the IRF computations, and msbvar
and
gibbs.msbvar
for the specification and computation of
the posterior for the MSBVAR models.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 | # Example 1
data(IsraelPalestineConflict)
varnames <- colnames(IsraelPalestineConflict)
fit.BVAR <- szbvar(Y=IsraelPalestineConflict, p=6, z=NULL,
lambda0=0.6, lambda1=0.1,
lambda3=2, lambda4=0.25, lambda5=0, mu5=0,
mu6=0, nu=3, qm=4,
prior=0, posterior.fit=FALSE)
# Draw from the posterior pdf of the impulse responses.
posterior.impulses <- mc.irf(fit.BVAR, nsteps=10, draws=5000)
# Plot the responses
plot(posterior.impulses, method=c("Sims-Zha2"), component=1,
probs=c(0.16,0.84), varnames=varnames)
# Example 2
ident <- diag(2)
varobj <- szbsvar(Y=IsraelPalestineConflict, p=6, z = NULL,
lambda=0.6, lambda1=0.1, lambda3=2, lambda4=0.25,
lambda5=0, mu5=0, mu6=0, ident, qm = 4)
A0.posterior <- gibbs.A0(varobj, N1=1000, N2=1000)
# Note you need to explcitly reference the sampled A0.posterior object
# in the following call for R to find it in the namespace!
impulse.sample <- mc.irf(varobj, nsteps=12, A0.posterior=A0.posterior)
plot(impulse.sample, varnames=colnames(IsraelPalestineConflict),
probs=c(0.16,0.84))
|
##
## MSBVAR Package v.0.9-2
## Build date: Wed Nov 1 00:38:08 2017
## Copyright (C) 2005-2017, Patrick T. Brandt
## Written by Patrick T. Brandt
##
## Support provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation
## (Grants SES-0351179, SES-0351205, SES-0540816, and SES-0921051)
##
Monte Carlo IRF Iteration = 1000
Monte Carlo IRF Iteration = 2000
Monte Carlo IRF Iteration = 3000
Monte Carlo IRF Iteration = 4000
Monte Carlo IRF Iteration = 5000
Estimating starting values for the numerical optimization
of the log posterior of A(0)
Estimating the final values for the numerical optimization
of the log posterior of A(0)
initial value 8.731056
final value 8.731056
converged
Normalization Method: DistanceMLA ( 0 )
Gibbs Burn-in 10 % Complete
Gibbs Burn-in 20 % Complete
Gibbs Burn-in 30 % Complete
Gibbs Burn-in 40 % Complete
Gibbs Burn-in 50 % Complete
Gibbs Burn-in 60 % Complete
Gibbs Burn-in 70 % Complete
Gibbs Burn-in 80 % Complete
Gibbs Burn-in 90 % Complete
Gibbs Burn-in 100 % Complete
Gibbs Sampling 10 % Complete (100 draws)
A0 log-det = -7.705272
Gibbs Sampling 20 % Complete (200 draws)
A0 log-det = -7.708311
Gibbs Sampling 30 % Complete (300 draws)
A0 log-det = -7.747621
Gibbs Sampling 40 % Complete (400 draws)
A0 log-det = -7.699357
Gibbs Sampling 50 % Complete (500 draws)
A0 log-det = -7.719407
Gibbs Sampling 60 % Complete (600 draws)
A0 log-det = -7.718144
Gibbs Sampling 70 % Complete (700 draws)
A0 log-det = -7.693222
Gibbs Sampling 80 % Complete (800 draws)
A0 log-det = -7.734632
Gibbs Sampling 90 % Complete (900 draws)
A0 log-det = -7.728900
Gibbs Sampling 100 % Complete (1000 draws)
A0 log-det = -7.775326
Monte Carlo IRF 10 % Complete
Monte Carlo IRF 20 % Complete
Monte Carlo IRF 30 % Complete
Monte Carlo IRF 40 % Complete
Monte Carlo IRF 50 % Complete
Monte Carlo IRF 60 % Complete
Monte Carlo IRF 70 % Complete
Monte Carlo IRF 80 % Complete
Monte Carlo IRF 90 % Complete
Monte Carlo IRF 100 % Complete
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.