epi.sssupc | R Documentation |
Sample size for a parallel superiority trial, continuous outcome.
epi.sssupc(treat, control, sigma, delta, n, power, r = 1, nfractional = FALSE,
alpha)
treat |
the expected mean of the outcome of interest in the treatment group. |
control |
the expected mean of the outcome of interest in the control group. |
sigma |
the expected population standard deviation of the outcome of interest. |
delta |
the equivalence limit, expressed as the absolute change in the outcome of interest that represents a clinically meaningful difference. For a superiority trial the value entered for |
n |
scalar, the total number of study subjects in the trial. |
power |
scalar, the required study power. |
r |
scalar, the number in the treatment group divided by the number in the control group. |
nfractional |
logical, return fractional sample size. |
alpha |
scalar, defining the desired alpha level. |
A list containing the following:
n.total |
the total number of study subjects required. |
n.treat |
the required number of study subject in the treatment group. |
n.control |
the required number of study subject in the control group. |
delta |
the equivalence limit, as entered by the user. |
power |
the specified or calculated study power. |
Consider a clinical trial comparing two groups, a standard treatment (s
) and a new treatment (n
). In each group, the mean of the outcome of interest for subjects receiving the standard treatment is N_{s}
and the mean of the outcome of interest for subjects receiving the new treatment is N_{n}
. We specify the absolute value of the maximum acceptable difference between N_{n}
and N_{s}
as \delta
. For a superiority trial the value entered for delta
must be greater than or equal to zero.
For a superiority trial the null hypothesis is:
H_{0}: N_{s} - N_{n} = 0
The alternative hypothesis is:
H_{1}: N_{s} - N_{n} != 0
When calculating the power of a study, the argument n
refers to the total study size (that is, the number of subjects in the treatment group plus the number in the control group).
For a comparison of the key features of superiority, equivalence and non-inferiority trials, refer to the documentation for epi.ssequb
.
Chow S, Shao J, Wang H (2008). Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series, page 61.
Julious SA (2004). Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Statistics in Medicine 23: 1921 - 1986.
Pocock SJ (1983). Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. Wiley, New York.
Wang B, Wang H, Tu X, Feng C (2017). Comparisons of superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence trials. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry 29, 385 - 388. DOI: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217163.
## EXAMPLE 1:
## A pharmaceutical company is interested in conducting a clinical trial
## to compare two cholesterol lowering agents for treatment of patients with
## congestive heart disease (CHD) using a parallel design. The primary
## efficacy parameter is the concentration of high density lipoproteins
## (HDL). We consider the situation where the intended trial is to test
## superiority of the test drug over the active control agent. Sample
## size calculations are to be calculated to achieve 80% power at the
## 5% level of significance.
## In this example, we assume that if treatment results in a 5 unit
## (i.e., delta = 5) increase in HDL it is declared to be superior to the
## active control. Assume the standard deviation of HDL is 10 units and
## the HDL concentration in the treatment group is 20 units and the
## HDL concentration in the control group is 20 units.
epi.sssupc(treat = 20, control = 20, sigma = 10, delta = 5, n = NA,
power = 0.80, r = 1, nfractional = FALSE, alpha = 0.05)
## A total of 100 subjects need to be enrolled in the trial, 50 in the
## treatment group and 50 in the control group.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.