facet_small_sample_review: Review per-facet-level sample adequacy

In mfrmr: Estimation and Diagnostics for Many-Facet Measurement Models

Review per-facet-level sample adequacy

Description

Reports per-level observation counts, SE, and fit statistics for every level of every facet in a fitted MFRM model, and classifies each level as "sparse", "marginal", "standard", or "strong" against the Linacre sample-size bands.

Usage

facet_small_sample_review(
  fit,
  diagnostics = NULL,
  thresholds = c(sparse = 10, marginal = 30, standard = 50)
)

Arguments

fit	An mfrm_fit from fit_mfrm().
diagnostics	Optional diagnose_mfrm() output. When supplied, per-level Infit, Outfit, and ModelSE are added to the report.
thresholds	Named numeric vector of count bands. Defaults are c(sparse = 10, marginal = 30, standard = 50). These are adapted from Linacre (1994): the 30-level band preserves Linacre's approximately ⁠+-1.0 logit at 95% CI⁠ line, while the sparse < 10 floor and the standard = 50 watermark are mfrmr-specific screening choices below Linacre's 30-examinee minimum and between Linacre's 30 and 100 thresholds.

Details

In mfrmr every facet is a fixed effect (see ?fit_mfrm, "Fixed effects assumption"), so a level with very few ratings contributes an estimate with wide SE but no shrinkage toward the facet mean. This helper surfaces those levels up front so users can decide whether to drop them, pool them, or move to a hierarchical model outside mfrmr.

Value

A list of class mfrm_facet_sample_review with:

• table: one row per ⁠(Facet, Level)⁠ with N, Estimate, SE, Infit, Outfit, and SampleCategory.

• summary: counts of levels in each sample-size category, by facet.

• facet_summary: smallest observed level count per facet.

• thresholds: the applied count bands.

Interpreting output

• "sparse" (n < 10): level-level estimate is unstable; SE will be wide; consider combining with adjacent levels or treating as exploratory only.

• "marginal" (10 <= n < 30): below Linacre (1994) 95% CI +-1.0 logit threshold; usable as screening only.

• "standard" (30 <= n < 50): meets baseline stability; reasonable for publication if fit statistics are acceptable.

• "strong" (n >= 50): well-targeted; facet estimate is robust.

Because mfrmr has no shrinkage by default, sparse and marginal levels do not "borrow strength" from other levels. Jones and Wind (2018) report that rater estimates are particularly sensitive to thin linking; the Facet = "Person" row is usually less of a concern because the person prior integrates out the uncertainty.

Typical workflow

1. Fit with fit_mfrm(); optionally also produce diagnostics with diagnose_mfrm() if you want per-level Infit/Outfit.

2. Call facet_small_sample_review(fit, diagnostics).

3. Read the facet_summary first: it highlights the worst level per facet. The summary table gives counts in each band.

4. If any facet is flagged as sparse or marginal, discuss it in the Methods section; build_apa_outputs() already adds a sentence about the band when fit$summary$FacetSampleSizeFlag is set.

References

Linacre, J. M. (2026). A User's Guide to FACETS, Version 4.5.0. Winsteps.com. https://www.winsteps.com/facets.htm

Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt74m.htm

Jones, E., & Wind, S. A. (2018). Using repeated ratings to improve measurement precision in incomplete rating designs. Journal of Applied Measurement, 19(2), 148-161.

See Also

detect_facet_nesting(), analyze_hierarchical_structure(), compute_facet_icc(), compute_facet_design_effect(), reporting_checklist().

Examples

toy <- load_mfrmr_data("example_core")
fit <- fit_mfrm(toy, "Person", c("Rater", "Criterion"), "Score",
                method = "JML", maxit = 30)
review <- facet_small_sample_review(fit)
summary(review)

# Custom thresholds (e.g. a stricter protocol).
strict <- facet_small_sample_review(
  fit,
  thresholds = c(sparse = 15, marginal = 40, standard = 100)
)
strict$facet_summary

mfrmr documentation built on June 13, 2026, 1:07 a.m.