struct_equiv | R Documentation |
Computes structural equivalence between ego and alter in a network
struct_equiv(graph, v = 1, inf.replace = 0, groupvar = NULL, ...)
## S3 method for class 'diffnet_se'
print(x, ...)
graph |
Any class of accepted graph format (see |
v |
Numeric scalar. Cohesion constant (see details). |
inf.replace |
Deprecated. |
groupvar |
Either a character scalar (if |
... |
Further arguments to be passed to |
x |
A |
Structure equivalence is computed as presented in Valente (1995), and Burt (1987), in particular
%
SE_{ij} = \frac{(dmax_i - d_{ji})^v}{\sum_{k\neq i}^n(dmax_i-d_{ki})^v}
with the summation over k\neq i
, and d_{ji}
, Eucledian distance in terms of geodesics, is defined as
%
d_{ji} = \left[(z_{ji} - z_{ij})^2 + \sum_k^n (z_{jk} - z_{ik})^2 + \sum_k^n (z_{ki} - z_{kj})^2\right]^\frac{1}{2}
with z_{ij}
as the geodesic (shortest path) from i
to j
, and
dmax_i
equal to largest Euclidean distance between i
and any other
vertex in the network. All summations are made over k\not\in \{i,j\}
Here, the value of v
is interpreted as cohesion level. The higher its value,
the higher will be the influence that the closests alters will have over ego (see
Burt's paper in the reference).
Structural equivalence can be computed either for the entire graph or by groups
of vertices. When, for example, the user knows before hand that the vertices
are distributed accross separated communities, he can make this explicit to
the function and provide a groupvar
variable that accounts for this.
Hence, when groupvar
is not NULL
the algorithm will compute
structural equivalence within communities as marked by groupvar
.
If graph
is a static graph, a list with the following elements:
SE |
Matrix of size |
d |
Matrix of size |
gdist |
Matrix of size |
In the case of dynamic graph, is a list of size t
in which each element
contains a list as described before. When groupvar
is specified, the
resulting matrices will be of class dgCMatrix
,
otherwise will be of class matrix
.
George G. Vega Yon & Thomas W. Valente
Burt, R. S. (1987). "Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence". American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1287–1335. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1086/228667")}
Valente, T. W. (1995). "Network models of the diffusion of innovations" (2nd ed.). Cresskill N.J.: Hampton Press.
Other statistics:
bass
,
classify_adopters()
,
cumulative_adopt_count()
,
dgr()
,
ego_variance()
,
exposure()
,
hazard_rate()
,
infection()
,
moran()
,
threshold()
,
vertex_covariate_dist()
# Computing structural equivalence for the fakedata -------------------------
data(fakesurvey)
# Coercing it into a diffnet object
fakediffnet <- survey_to_diffnet(
fakesurvey, "id", c("net1", "net2", "net3"), "toa", "group"
)
# Computing structural equivalence without specifying group
se_all <- struct_equiv(fakediffnet)
# Notice that pairs of individuals from different communities have
# non-zero values
se_all
se_all[[1]]$SE
# ... Now specifying a groupvar
se_group <- struct_equiv(fakediffnet, groupvar="group")
# Notice that pairs of individuals from different communities have
# only zero values.
se_group
se_group[[1]]$SE
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.