This function checks whether an intercept is present in a formula of
some form. It works for a `formula`

, a
`terms.object`

a `pim.formula`

object or
a character vector representing a formula.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | ```
has.intercept(x)
## S4 method for signature 'character'
has.intercept(x)
## S4 method for signature 'formula'
has.intercept(x)
## S4 method for signature 'terms'
has.intercept(x)
## S4 method for signature 'pim.formula'
has.intercept(x)
## S4 method for signature 'pim'
has.intercept(x)
``` |

`x` |
either a |

In case of a `terms.object`

, this function only checks whether the
`intercept`

attribute is larger than 0. In all other cases, the
function checks whether it can find a `+ 1`

somewhere in the formula,
indicating that an intercept has to be fit in a `pim`

.

a single logical value

This function will return `FALSE`

for a standard formula
that is used in the context of a marginal model. Keep in mind that when
specifying `model = 'marginal'`

in a call to `pim`

, the model
will contain an intercept regardless of the outcome of `has.intercept`

This function is meant to be used in the context of a `pim`

call. Although the function should work for standard formulas as well,
correct results are not guaranteed when used outside a pim context.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | ```
data("FEVData")
# Create the "model frame"
FEVenv <- new.pim.env(FEVData, compare="unique")
# create the formula and bind it to the pim.environment.
FEVform <- new.pim.formula(
Age ~ I(L(Height) - R(Height)) ,
FEVenv
)
has.intercept(FEVform)
FEVform2 <- new.pim.formula(Age ~ Height + 1, FEVData)
has.intercept(FEVform2)
``` |

Questions? Problems? Suggestions? Tweet to @rdrrHQ or email at ian@mutexlabs.com.

Please suggest features or report bugs with the GitHub issue tracker.

All documentation is copyright its authors; we didn't write any of that.