| add_neighbor_penalties | R Documentation |
Add penalties to a conservation planning problem to penalize solutions that have few neighboring planning units. These penalties can be used to promote spatial clustering in solutions. In particular, they are recommended for reducing spatial fragmentation in large-scale problems or when using open source solvers.
## S4 method for signature 'ConservationProblem,ANY,ANY,matrix'
add_neighbor_penalties(x, penalty, zones, data)
## S4 method for signature 'ConservationProblem,ANY,ANY,data.frame'
add_neighbor_penalties(x, penalty, zones, data)
## S4 method for signature 'ConservationProblem,ANY,ANY,ANY'
add_neighbor_penalties(x, penalty, zones, data)
## S4 method for signature 'ConservationProblem,ANY,ANY,array'
add_neighbor_penalties(x, penalty, zones, data)
x |
|
penalty |
|
zones |
|
data |
|
This function adds penalties to conservation planning problem to penalize solutions that have low spatial clustering. Specifically, it favors pair-wise connections between planning units that have high connectivity values (based on Önal and Briers 2002).
An updated problem() object with the penalties added to it.
The neighbor penalties are implemented using the following equations.
Let I represent the set of planning units
(indexed by i or j), Z represent the set
of management zones (indexed by z or y), and X_{iz}
represent the decision variable for planning unit i for in zone
z (e.g., with binary
values one indicating if planning unit is allocated or not). Also, let
p represent the argument to penalty, D represent the
argument to data , and W represent the argument
to zones.
If the argument to data is supplied as a matrix or
Matrix object, then the penalties are calculated as:
\sum_{i}^{I} \sum_{j}^{I} \sum_{z}^{Z} \sum_{y}^{Z} (-p \times X_{iz}
\times X_{jy} \times D_{ij} \times W_{zy})
Otherwise, if the argument to data is supplied as a
data.frame or array object, then the penalties are
calculated as:
\sum_{i}^{I} \sum_{j}^{I} \sum_{z}^{Z} \sum_{y}^{Z} (-p \times X_{iz}
\times X_{jy} \times D_{ijzy})
Note that when the problem objective is to maximize some measure of
benefit and not minimize some measure of cost, the term -p is
replaced with p.
The argument to data can be specified using the following formats:
data as a NULL valueneighborhood data should be calculated
automatically
using the adjacency_matrix() function. This is the default
argument. Note that the neighborhood data must be manually defined
using one of the other formats below when the planning unit data
in the argument to x is not spatially referenced (e.g.,
in data.frame or numeric format).
data as a matrix/Matrix objectwhere rows and columns represent
different planning units and the value of each cell indicates if the
two planning units are neighbors or not. Cell values should be binary
numeric values (i.e., one or zero). Cells that occur along the
matrix diagonal have no effect on the solution at all because each
planning unit cannot be a neighbor with itself.
data as a data.frame objectcontaining columns that are named
"id1", "id2", and "boundary". Here, each row
denotes the connectivity between two planning units following the
Marxan format. The "boundary" column should contain
binary numeric values that indicate if the two planning units
specified in the "id1" and "id2" columns are neighbors
or not. This data can be used to describe symmetric or
asymmetric relationships between planning units. By default,
input data is assumed to be symmetric unless asymmetric data is
also included (e.g., if data is present for planning units 2 and 3, then
the same amount of connectivity is expected for planning units 3 and 2,
unless connectivity data is also provided for planning units 3 and 2).
If the argument to x contains multiple zones, then the
"zone1" and "zone2" columns can optionally be provided to manually
specify if the neighborhood data pertain to specific zones. The
"zone1" and "zone2" columns should contain the character
names of the zones. If the columns "zone1" and "zone2"
are present, then the argument to zones must be NULL.
data as an array objectcontaining four-dimensions where binary
numeric values indicate if planning unit should be treated
as being neighbors with every other planning unit when they
are allocated to every combination of management zone. The first two
dimensions (i.e., rows and columns) correspond to the planning units,
and second two dimensions correspond to the management zones. For
example, if the argument to data had a value of 1 at the index
data[1, 2, 3, 4] this would indicate that planning unit 1 and
planning unit 2 should be treated as neighbors when they are
allocated to zones 3 and 4 respectively.
Williams JC, ReVelle CS, and Levin SA (2005) Spatial attributes and reserve design models: A review. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 10: 163–181.
Other functions for adding penalties:
add_asym_connectivity_penalties(),
add_boundary_penalties(),
add_connectivity_penalties(),
add_feature_weights(),
add_linear_penalties()
## Not run:
# load data
sim_pu_raster <- get_sim_pu_raster()
sim_features <- get_sim_features()
sim_zones_pu_raster <- get_sim_zones_pu_raster()
sim_zones_features <- get_sim_zones_features()
# create minimal problem
p1 <-
problem(sim_pu_raster, sim_features) %>%
add_min_set_objective() %>%
add_relative_targets(0.1) %>%
add_default_solver(verbose = FALSE)
# create problem with low neighbor penalties and
# using a rook-style neighborhood (the default neighborhood style)
p2 <- p1 %>% add_neighbor_penalties(0.001)
# create problem with high penalties
# using a rook-style neighborhood (the default neighborhood style)
p3 <- p1 %>% add_neighbor_penalties(0.01)
# create problem with high penalties and using a queen-style neighborhood
p4 <-
p1 %>%
add_neighbor_penalties(
0.01, data = adjacency_matrix(sim_pu_raster, directions = 8)
)
# solve problems
s1 <- c(solve(p1), solve(p2), solve(p3), solve(p4))
names(s1) <- c("basic solution", "low (rook)", "high (rook)", "high (queen")
# plot solutions
plot(s1, axes = FALSE)
# create minimal problem with multiple zones
p5 <-
problem(sim_zones_pu_raster, sim_zones_features) %>%
add_min_set_objective() %>%
add_relative_targets(matrix(0.1, ncol = 3, nrow = 5)) %>%
add_default_solver(verbose = FALSE)
# create problem with low neighbor penalties, a rook style neighborhood,
# and planning units are only considered neighbors if they are allocated to
# the same zone
z6 <- diag(3)
print(z6)
p6 <- p5 %>% add_neighbor_penalties(0.001, zones = z6)
# create problem with high penalties and the same neighborhood as above
p7 <- p5 %>% add_neighbor_penalties(0.01, zones = z6)
# create problem with high neighborhood penalties, a queen-style
# neighborhood, neighboring planning units that are allocated to zones 1
# or 2 are treated as neighbors
z8 <- diag(3)
z8[1, 2] <- 1
z8[2, 1] <- 1
print(z8)
p8 <- p5 %>% add_neighbor_penalties(0.01, zones = z8)
# create problem with high neighborhood penalties, a queen-style
# neighborhood, and here we want to promote spatial fragmentation
# within each zone, so we use negative zone values.
z9 <- diag(3) * -1
print(z9)
p9 <- p5 %>% add_neighbor_penalties(0.01, zones = z9)
# solve problems
s2 <- list(p5, p6, p7, p8, p9)
s2 <- lapply(s2, solve)
s2 <- lapply(s2, category_layer)
s2 <- terra::rast(s2)
names(s2) <- c("basic problem", "p6", "p7", "p8", "p9")
# plot solutions
plot(s2, main = names(s2), axes = FALSE)
## End(Not run)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.