seriate: Seriate Dissimilarity Matrices, Matrices or Arrays

In seriation: Infrastructure for Ordering Objects Using Seriation

Seriate Dissimilarity Matrices, Matrices or Arrays

Description

Tries to find a linear order for objects using data in the form of a dissimilarity matrix (two-way one-mode data), a data matrix (two-way two-mode data), or a data array (k-way k-mode data). The order can then be used to reorder the dissimilarity matrix/data matrix using permute().

Usage

seriate(x, ...)

## S3 method for class 'dist'
seriate(x, method = "Spectral", control = NULL, ...)

## S3 method for class 'matrix'
seriate(x, method = "PCA", control = NULL, margin = c(1L, 2L), ...)

## S3 method for class 'array'
seriate(x, method = "PCA", control = NULL, margin = seq(length(dim(x))), ...)

## S3 method for class 'data.frame'
seriate(x, method = "Heatmap", control = NULL, margin = c(1L, 2L), ...)

## S3 method for class 'table'
seriate(x, method = "CA", control = NULL, margin = c(1L, 2L), ...)

Arguments

x	the data.
...	further arguments are added to the control list.
method	a character string with the name of the seriation method (default: varies by data type).
control	a list of control options passed on to the seriation algorithm.
margin	an integer vector giving the margin indices (dimensions) to be seriated. For example, for a matrix, 1 indicates rows, 2 indicates columns, c(1 ,2) means rows and columns. Unseriated margins return the identity seriation order for that margin.

Details

Seriation methods are managed via a registry. See list_seriation_methods() for help. In the following, we focus on discussing the built-in methods that are registered automatically by the package seriation.

The available control options, default settings, and a description for each algorithm can be retrieved using get_seriation_method(name = "<seriation method>"). Some control parameters are also described in more detail below.

Some methods are very slow, and progress can be printed using the control parameter verbose = TRUE.

Many seriation methods (heuristically) optimize (minimize or maximize) an objective function often called seriation criterion. The value of the seriation criterion for a given order can be calculated using criterion(). In this manual page, we include the criterion, which is optimized by each method using bold font. If no criterion is mentioned, then the method does not directly optimize a criterion. A definition of the different seriation criteria can be found on the criterion() manual page.

Seriation methods for distance matrices (dist)

One-mode two-way data must be provided as a dist object (not a symmetric matrix). Similarities have to be transformed into dissimilarities. Seriation algorithms fall into different groups based on the approach. In the following, we describe the currently implemented methods. A list with all methods and the available parameters is available here. Hahsler (2017) for a more detailed description and an experimental comparison of the most popular methods.

Dendrogram leaf order

These methods create a dendrogram using hierarchical clustering and then derive the seriation order from the leaf order in the dendrogram. Leaf reordering may be applied.

• Hierarchical clustering: "HC", "HC_single", "HC_complete", "HC_average", "HC_ward"

  Uses the order of the leaf nodes in a dendrogram obtained by hierarchical clustering as a simple seriation technique. This method applies hierarchical clustering (hclust()) to x. The clustering method can be given using a "linkage" element in the control list. If omitted, the default "complete" is used. For convenience, the other methods are provided as shortcuts.

• Reordered by the Gruvaeus and Wainer heuristic: "GW", "GW_single", "GW_average", "GW_complete", "GW_ward" (Gruvaeus and Wainer, 1972)

  Method "GW" uses an algorithm developed by Gruvaeus and Wainer (1972) as implemented gclus::reorder.hclust() (Hurley 2004). The clusters are ordered at each level so that the objects at the edge of each cluster are adjacent to the nearest object outside the cluster. The method produces a unique order.

  The methods start with a dendrogram created by hclust(). As the "linkage" element in the control list, a clustering method (default "average") can be specified. Alternatively, an hclust object can be supplied using an element named "hclust".

  A dendrogram (binary tree) has 2^{n-1} internal nodes (subtrees) and the same number of leaf orderings. That is, at each internal node, the left and right subtree (or leaves) can be swapped or, in terms of a dendrogram, be flipped. The leaf-node reordering to minimize

  Minimizes the Hamiltonian path length (restricted by the dendrogram).

• Reordered by optimal leaf ordering: "OLO", "OLO_single", "OLO_average", "OLO_complete", "OLO_ward" (Bar-Joseph et al., 2001)

  Starts with a dendrogram and produces an optimal leaf ordering that minimizes the sum of the distances along the (Hamiltonian) path connecting the leaves in the given order. The algorithm's time complexity is O(n^3). Note that non-finite distance values are not allowed.

  Minimizes the Hamiltonian path length (restricted by the dendrogram).

• Dendrogram seriation: "DendSer" (Earle and Hurley, 2015)

  Use heuristic dendrogram seriation to optimize for various criteria. The DendSer code has to be first registered. A detailed description can be found on the manual page for register_DendSer().

Dimensionality reduction

Find a seriation order by reducing the dimensionality to 1 dimension. This is typically done by minimizing a stress measure or the reconstruction error. Note that dimensionality reduction to a single dimension is a very difficult discrete optimization problem. For example, MDS algorithms used for a single dimension tend to end up in local optima (see Maier and De Leeuw, 2015). However, generally, ordering along a single component of MDS provides good results sufficient for applications like visualization.

• Classical metric multidimensional scaling: "MDS"

  Orders along the 1D classical metric multidimensional scaling. control parameters are passed on to stats::cmdscale().

• Isometric feature mapping: "isomap" (Tenenbaum, 2000)

  Orders along the 1D isometric feature mapping. control parameters are passed on to vegan::isomap()

• Kruskal's non-metric multidimensional scaling: "isoMDS", "monoMDS", "metaMDS" (Kruskal, 1964)

  Orders along the 1D Kruskal's non-metric multidimensional scaling. Package vegan implements an alternative implementation called monoMDS and a version that uses random restarts for stability called metaMDS. control parameters are passed on to MASS::isoMDS(), vegan::monoMDS() or vegan::metaMDS().

• Sammon's non-linear mapping: "Sammon_mapping" (Sammon, 1969)

  Orders along the 1D Sammon's non-linear mapping. control parameters are passed on to MASS::sammon().

• Angle in 2D principal coordinates space: "MDS_angle"

  Finds a 2D configuration using MDS (cmdscale()) and then orders by the angle in this space. The order is split by the larges gap between adjacent angles. A similar method was used by Friendly (2002) to order variables in correlation matrices by angles of first two eigenvectors.

• Smacof: "MDS_smacof" (de Leeuw and Mair, 2009)

  Perform seriation using stress majorization with several transformation functions. This method has to be registered first using register_smacof().

Optimization

These methods try to optimize a seriation criterion directly, typically using a heuristic approach.

• Anti-Robinson seriation by simulated annealing: "ARSA" (Brusco et al 2008)

  The algorithm automatically finds a suitable start temperature and calculates the needed number of iterations. The algorithm gets slow for a large number of objects. The speed can be improved by lowering the cooling parameter "cool" or increasing the minimum temperature "tmin". However, this will decrease the seriation quality.

  Directly minimizes the linear seriation criterion (LS).

• Complete Enumeration: "Enumerate"

  This method finds the optimal permutation given a seriation criterion by complete enumeration of all permutations. The criterion is specified as the control parameters "criterion". Default is the weighted gradient measure. Use "verbose = TRUE" to see the progress.

  Note: The number of permutations for n objects is n!. Complete enumeration is only possible for tiny problems (<10 objects) and is limited on most systems to a problem size of up to 12 objects.

• Gradient measure seriation by branch-and-bound: "BBURCG", "BBWRCG" (Brusco and Stahl 2005)

  The method uses branch-and-bound to minimize the unweighted gradient measure ("BBURCG") and the weighted gradient measure ("BBWRCG"). This type of optimization is only feasible for a small number of objects (< 50 objects).

  For BBURCG, the control parameter "eps" can be used to relax the problem by defining that a distance needs to be eps larger to count as a violation. This relaxation will improve the speed, but miss some Robinson events. The default value is 0.

• Genetic Algorithm: "GA"

  The GA code has to be first registered. A detailed description can be found on the manual page for register_GA().

• Quadratic assignment problem seriation: "QAP_LS", "QAP_2SUM", "QAP_BAR", "QAP_Inertia" (Hahsler, 2017)

  Formulates the seriation problem as a quadratic assignment problem and applies a simulated annealing solver to find a good solution. These methods minimize the Linear Seriation Problem (LS) formulation (Hubert and Schultz 1976), the 2-Sum Problem formulation (Barnard, Pothen, and Simon 1993), the banded anti-Robinson form (BAR), or the inertia criterion.

  control parameters are passed on to qap::qap(). An important parameter is rep to return the best result from the given number of repetitions with random restarts. The default is 1, but bigger numbers result in better and more stable results.

• General Simulated Annealing: "GSA"

  Implement simulated annealing similar to the ARSA method. However, it can optimize for any criterion measure defined in seriation. By default, the algorithm optimizes for the raw gradient measure, and is warm started with the result of spectral seriation (2-Sum problem) since Hahsler (2017) shows that 2-Sum solutions are similar to solutions for the gradient measure. Use warmstart = "random" for no warm start.

  The initial temperature t0 and minimum temperature tmin can be set. If t0 is not set, then it is estimated by sampling uphill moves and setting t0 such that the median uphill move have a probability of tinitialaccept. Using the cooling rate cool, the number of iterations to go for t0 to tmin is calculated.

  Several popular local neighborhood functions are provided, and new ones can be defined (see LS). Local moves are tried in each iteration nlocal times the number of objects.

  Note that this is an R implementation repeatedly calling the criterion funciton which is very slow.

• Stochastic gradient descent: "SGD"

  Starts with a solution and then performs stochastic gradient descent to find a close-by local optimum given a specified criterion.

  Important control parameters:

  • "criterion": the criterion to optimize

  • "init": initial seriation (an order or the name of a seriation method)

  • "max_iter": number of trials

• Spectral seriation: "Spectral", "Spectral_norm" (Ding and He, 2004)

  Spectral seriation uses a relaxation to minimize the 2-Sum Problem (Barnard, Pothen, and Simon, 1993). It uses the order of the Fiedler vector of the similarity matrix's (normalized) Laplacian.

  Spectral seriation gives a good trade-off between seriation quality, and scalability (see Hahsler, 2017).

• Traveling salesperson problem solver: "TSP"

  Uses a traveling salesperson problem solver to minimize the Hamiltonian path length. The solvers in TSP are used (see TSP::solve_TSP()). The solver method can be passed on via the control argument, e.g., control = list(method = "two_opt"). Default is the est of 10 runs of arbitrary insertion heuristic with 2-opt improvement.

  Since a tour returned by a TSP solver is a connected circle and we are looking for a path representing a linear order, we need to find the best cutting point. Climer and Zhang (2006) suggest adding a dummy city with equal distance to each other city before generating the tour. The place of this dummy city in an optimal tour with minimal length is the best cutting point (it lies between the most distant cities).

Other Methods

• Identity permutation: '"Identity"

• Reverse Identity permutation: '"Reverse"

• Random permutation: "Random"

• Rank-two ellipse seriation: "R2E" (Chen 2002)

  Rank-two ellipse seriation starts with generating a sequence of correlation matrices R^1, R^2, \ldots. R^1 is the correlation matrix of the original distance matrix D (supplied to the function as x), and

  R^{n+1} = \phi R^n,

  where \phi calculates the correlation matrix.

  The rank of the matrix R^n falls with increasing n. The first R^n in the sequence, which has a rank of 2 is found. Projecting all points in this matrix on the first two eigenvectors, all points fall on an ellipse. The order of the points on this ellipse is the resulting order.

  The ellipse can be cut at the two interception points (top or bottom) of the vertical axis with the ellipse. In this implementation, the topmost cutting point is used.

• Sorting Points Into Neighborhoods: "SPIN_STS", "SPIN_NH" (Tsafrir, 2005)

  Given a weight matrix W, the SPIN algorithms try to minimize the energy for a permutation (matrix P) given by

  F(P) = tr(PDP^TW),

  where tr denotes the matrix trace.

  "SPIN_STS" implements the Side-to-Side algorithm, which tries to push out large distance values. The default weight matrix suggested in the paper with W=XX^T and X_i=i-(n+1)/2 is used. We run the algorithm form step (25) iteration and restart the algorithm nstart (10) with random initial permutations (default values in parentheses).

  "SPIN_NH" implements the neighborhood algorithm (concentrate low distance values around the diagonal) with a Gaussian weight matrix W_{ij} = exp(-(i-j)^2/n\sigma), where n is the size of the dissimilarity matrix and \sigma is the variance around the diagonal that control the influence of global (large \sigma) or local (small \sigma) structure.

  We use the heuristic suggested in the paper for the linear assignment problem. We do not terminate as indicated in the algorithm but run all the iterations since the heuristic does not guarantee that the energy is strictly decreasing. We also implement the heuristic "annealing" scheme where \sigma is successively reduced. The parameters in control are sigma which can be a single value or a decreasing sequence (default: 20 to 1 in 10 steps), and step, which defines how many update steps are performed before for each value of alpha. Via W_function a custom function to create W with the function signature ⁠function(n, sigma, verbose)⁠ can be specified.

• Visual Assessment of (Clustering) Tendency: "VAT" (Bezdek and Hathaway, 2002).

  Creates an order based on Prim's algorithm for finding a minimum spanning tree (MST) in a weighted connected graph representing the distance matrix. The order is given by the order in which the nodes (objects) are added to the MST.

Seriation methods for matrices (matrix)

Two-mode two-way data are general matrices. Some methods also require that the matrix is positive. Data frames and contingency tables (base::table) are converted into a matrix. However, the default methods are different.

Some methods find the row and column order simultaneously, while others calculate them independently. Currently, the following methods are implemented for matrix:

Seriating rows and columns simultaneously

Row and column order influence each other.

• Bond Energy Algorithm: "BEA" (McCormick, 1972).

  The algorithm tries to maximize a non-negative matrix's Measure of Effectiveness. Due to the definition of this measure, the tasks of ordering rows and columns are separable and can be solved independently.

  A row is arbitrarily placed; then, rows are positioned one by one. When this is completed, the columns are treated similarly. The overall procedure amounts to two approximate traveling salesperson problems (TSP), one on the rows and one on the columns. The so-called ‘best insertion strategy’ is used: rows (or columns) are inserted into the current permuted list of rows (or columns). Several consecutive runs of the algorithm might improve the energy.

  Arabie and Hubert (1990) question its use with non-binary data if the objective is to find a seriation or one-dimensional orderings of rows and columns.

  Fionn Murtagh implemented the BEA code used in this package.

• TSP to optimize the Measure of Effectiveness: "BEA_TSP" (Lenstra 1974).

  Distances between rows are calculated for a M \times N data matrix as d_{jk} = - \sum_{i=1}^{i=M} x_{ij}x_{ik}\ (j,k=0,1,...,N). Distances between columns are calculated the same way from the transposed data matrix.

  Solving the two TSP using these distances optimizes the measure of effectiveness. BEA can be seen as a simple, suboptimal TSP method.

  control parameter:

  • "method": a TSP solver method (see TSP::solve_TSP()).

• Correspondence analysis "CA"

  This function is designed to help simplify a mosaic plot or other displays of a matrix of frequencies. It calculates a correspondence analysis of the matrix and an order for rows and columns according to the scores on a correspondence analysis dimension.

  This is the default method for contingency tables.

  control parameters:

  • "dim": CA dimension used for reordering.

  • "ca_param": List with parameters for the call to ca::ca().

Seriating rows and columns separately using dissimilarities

• Heatmap seriation: "Heatmap"

  Calculates distances between rows and between columns and then applies seriation so each. This is the default method for data frames.

  control parameter:

  • "seriation_method": a list with row and column seriation methods. The special method "HC_Mean" is available to use hierarchical clustering with reordering the leaves by the row/column means (see stats::heatmap()). Defaults to optimal leaf ordering "OLO".

  • "seriation_control": a list with control parameters for row and column seriation methods.

  • "dist_fun": specify the distance calculation as a function.

  • "scale": "none", "row", or "col".

Seriate rows using the data matrix

These methods need access to the data matrix instead of dissimilarities to reorder objects (rows). Columns can also be reorderd by applying the same technique to the transposed data matrix.

• Order along the 1D locally linear embedding: "LLE"

Performs 1D the non-linear dimensionality reduction method locally linear embedding (see lle()).

• Order along the first principal component: "PCA"

  Uses the projection of the data on its first principal component to determine the order of rows. Performs the same procedure on the transposed matrix to obtain the column order.

  Note that for a distance matrix calculated from x with Euclidean distance, this method minimizes the least square criterion.

• Order using the angle in the space spanned by the first two principal components: "PCA_angle" (Friendly, 2002)

  For rows, projects the data on the first two principal components and then orders by the angle in this space. The order is split by the larges gap between adjacent angles. This method was suggested by Friendly (2002) to order variables in correlation matrices by angles of first two eigenvectors. Performs the same process on the transposed matrix for the column order.

Other methods

• Identity permutation: "Identity"

• Reverse Identity permutation: "Reverse"

• Random permutation: "Random"

• By row/column mean: "mean"

  A transformation can be applied before calculating the means. The function is specified as control parameter "transformation". Any function that takes as an input a matrix and returns the transformed matrix can be used. Examples are scale or ⁠\(x) x^.5⁠.

For general arrays no built-in methods are currently available.

Value

Returns an object of class ser_permutation.

Author(s)

Michael Hahsler

References

Arabie, P. and L.J. Hubert (1990): The bond energy algorithm revisited, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20(1), 268–274. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1109/21.47829")}

Bar-Joseph, Z., E. D. Demaine, D. K. Gifford, and T. Jaakkola. (2001): Fast Optimal Leaf Ordering for Hierarchical Clustering. Bioinformatics, 17(1), 22–29. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1093/bioinformatics/17.suppl_1.S22")}

Barnard, S. T., A. Pothen, and H. D. Simon (1993): A Spectral Algorithm for Envelope Reduction of Sparse Matrices. In Proceedings of the 1993 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, 493–502. Supercomputing '93. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1263497

Bezdek, J.C. and Hathaway, R.J. (2002): VAT: a tool for visual assessment of (cluster) tendency. Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN '02), Volume: 3, 2225–2230. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1109/IJCNN.2002.1007487")}

Brusco, M., Koehn, H.F., and Stahl, S. (2008): Heuristic Implementation of Dynamic Programming for Matrix Permutation Problems in Combinatorial Data Analysis. Psychometrika, 73(3), 503–522. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1007/s11336-007-9049-5")}

Brusco, M., and Stahl, S. (2005): Branch-and-Bound Applications in Combinatorial Data Analysis. New York: Springer. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1007/0-387-28810-4")}

Chen, C. H. (2002): Generalized Association Plots: Information Visualization via Iteratively Generated Correlation Matrices. Statistica Sinica, 12(1), 7–29.

Ding, C. and Xiaofeng He (2004): Linearized cluster assignment via spectral ordering. Proceedings of the Twenty-first International Conference on Machine learning (ICML '04). \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1145/1015330.1015407")}

Climer, S. and Xiongnu Zhang (2006): Rearrangement Clustering: Pitfalls, Remedies, and Applications, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7(Jun), 919–943.

D. Earle, C. B. Hurley (2015): Advances in dendrogram seriation for application to visualization. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 24(1), 1–25.

Friendly, M. (2002): Corrgrams: Exploratory Displays for Correlation Matrices. The American Statistician, 56(4), 316–324. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1198/000313002533")}

Gruvaeus, G. and Wainer, H. (1972): Two Additions to Hierarchical Cluster Analysis, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 200–206. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1111/j.2044-8317.1972.tb00491.x")}

Hahsler, M. (2017): An experimental comparison of seriation methods for one-mode two-way data. European Journal of Operational Research, 257, 133–143. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.066")}

Hubert, Lawrence, and James Schultz (1976): Quadratic Assignment as a General Data Analysis Strategy. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 29(2). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 190–241. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1111/j.2044-8317.1976.tb00714.x")}

Hurley, Catherine B. (2004): Clustering Visualizations of Multidimensional Data. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 13(4), 788–806. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1198/106186004X12425")}

Kruskal, J.B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29, 115–129.

Lenstra, J.K (1974): Clustering a Data Array and the Traveling-Salesman Problem, Operations Research, 22(2) 413–414. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1287/opre.22.2.413")}

Mair P., De Leeuw J. (2015). Unidimensional scaling. In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, Wiley, New York. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1002/9781118445112.stat06462.pub2")}

McCormick, W.T., P.J. Schweitzer and T.W. White (1972): Problem decomposition and data reorganization by a clustering technique, Operations Research, 20(5), 993–1009. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1287/opre.20.5.993")}

Tenenbaum, J.B., de Silva, V. & Langford, J.C. (2000) A global network framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290, 2319-2323.

Tsafrir, D., Tsafrir, I., Ein-Dor, L., Zuk, O., Notterman, D.A. and Domany, E. (2005): Sorting points into neighborhoods (SPIN): data analysis and visualization by ordering distance matrices, Bioinformatics, 21(10) 2301–8. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1093/bioinformatics/bti329")}

Sammon, J. W. (1969) A non-linear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Trans. Comput., C-18 401–409.

See Also

Other seriation: register_DendSer(), register_GA(), register_optics(), register_smacof(), register_tsne(), register_umap(), registry_for_seriaiton_methods, seriate_best()

Examples

# Show available seriation methods (for dist and matrix)
list_seriation_methods()

# show the description for ARSA
get_seriation_method("dist", name = "ARSA")

### Seriate as distance matrix (for the iris dataset)
data("iris")
x <- as.matrix(iris[-5])
x <- x[sample(1:nrow(x)), ]
d <- dist(x)

order <- seriate(d)
order

pimage(d, main = "Distances (Random Order)")
pimage(d, order, main = "Distances (Reordered)")

# Compare seriation quality
rbind(
        random = criterion(d),
        reordered = criterion(d, order)
     )

# Reorder the distance matrix
d_reordered <-  permute(d, order)
pimage(d_reordered, main = "Distances (Reordered)")


### Seriate a matrix
data("iris")
x <- as.matrix(iris[-5])

# To make the variables comparable, we scale the data
x <- scale(x, center = FALSE)

# The iris flowers are ordered by species in the data set
pimage(x, main = "original data", prop = FALSE)
criterion(x)

# Apply some methods
order <- seriate(x, method = "BEA_TSP")
pimage(x, order, main = "TSP to optimize ME", prop = FALSE)
criterion(x, order)

order <- seriate(x, method = "PCA")
pimage(x, order, main = "First principal component", prop = FALSE)
criterion(x, order)

order <- seriate(x, method = "heatmap")
pimage(x, order, main = "Heatmap seriation", prop = FALSE)
criterion(x, order)

# reorder the matrix
x_reordered <- permute(x, order)

# create a heatmap seriation manually by calculating
# distances between rows and between columns
order <- c(
    seriate(dist(x), method = "OLO"),
    seriate(dist(t(x)), method = "OLO")
)
pimage(x, order, main = "Heatmap seriation", prop = FALSE)
criterion(x, order)

### Seriate a correlation matrix
corr <- cor(x)

# plot in original order
pimage(corr, upper_tri = FALSE, main = "Correlation matrix")

# we need to define a distance (we used d = sqrt(2(1 - r))) and
# then reorder the matrix (rows and columns).
d <- as.dist(sqrt(2 * (1 - corr)))
o <- seriate(d)
corr_reordered <- permute(corr, order = c(o, o))
pimage(corr_reordered, upper_tri = FALSE, main = "Correlation matrix (reordered)")

seriation documentation built on July 26, 2023, 5:07 p.m.