Description Usage Arguments Details Value References Examples
Modified Bland-Altman plot for multiple raters
1 2 3 4 |
rater |
Variable indicating which rater made the rating. |
subject |
Variable for the subject. |
variable |
Variable containing the ratings of the subjects. |
data |
The dataframe |
LoA |
The limits of agreement that have to be used. See Details. |
ArgzLoess |
Arguments for |
symbols.graph |
Optional, the symbols to be used in the graph for the raters. |
colSymbols |
Optional, the color of the symbols |
Legend |
Logical, indicates whether a legend has to be printed. Default is |
ArgzLegend |
The arguments for the legend, see |
xlab |
The label for the x-axis. |
ylab |
The label for the y-axis. |
... |
Additional arguments to be passed to |
The limits of agreement (LoA) have to be interpreted differently than in Bland-Altman plots with 2 raters. In the modified Bland-Altman
plots, the LoA indicate how different an individual rater can be when compared with the mean of all the raters (Jones et al., 2011). However, as with the
Bland-Altman plots for 2 raters, it may be that the variability of the differences increase as the magnitude of the measurement increases (Bland and
Altman, 1999). Alternative LoA can then be plotted using a method based on the method of Royston and Wright (1998). Specifying LoA="loess"
, we get
approximate 2.5 and 97.5 percentile curves. In this method, the standard deviation of the difference scores per subject is calculated and the LoA
per subject are calculated as -/+ 1.96 times the standard deviation. A loess fit is then used to connect these LoA per subject. Note that we assume
that the difference scores are normally distributed (with mean 0 as we are working with centered values).
Returns a list with the following objects
AnovaSummary |
The summary of the two-way ANOVA |
AvgPerSubject |
The average score per subject. |
LoA |
The limits of agreement calculated according to Jones et al. (2011). |
ICC |
The intraclass correlation coefficients. See |
Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G.(1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods In Medical Research, Vol.8(2), pp. 135-160
Jones, M., Dobson, A., O'Brian, S. (2011). A graphical method for assessing agreement with the mean between multiple observers using continuous measures. Int J Epidemiol. Vol.40: pp. 1308-1313.
Royston, P., Wright, E.M. (1988). How to construct 'normal ranges' for fetal variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, Vol.11: pp. 30-38.
1 2 | data(DentalStudy)
BAplotMultipleR(dentist, patient, DMFS, DentalStudy)
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.