View source: R/mobr_boxplots.R
calc_comm_div | R Documentation |
Calculate biodiversity statistics from sites by species table.
calc_comm_div(
abund_mat,
index,
effort = NA,
extrapolate = TRUE,
return_NA = FALSE,
rare_thres = 0.05,
scales = c("alpha", "gamma", "beta"),
avg_alpha = FALSE,
PIE_replace = FALSE,
C_target_gamma = NA,
...
)
abund_mat |
Abundance based site-by-species table. Species as columns |
index |
The calculated biodiversity indices. The options are
See Details for additional information on the biodiversity statistics. |
effort |
The standardized number of individuals used for the calculation of rarefied species richness. This must be a single integer. |
extrapolate |
Boolean which specifies if richness should be extrapolated when effort is larger than the number of individuals using the chao1 method (Chao 1984, 1987). Defaults to TRUE. |
return_NA |
Boolean in which the rarefaction function returns the
observed S when |
rare_thres |
The threshold that determines how the metric
|
scales |
The scales to compute the diversity indices for:
Defaults to all three scales: |
avg_alpha |
Boolean if TRUE then the alpha values are averaged. Defaults to FALSE. |
PIE_replace |
Used for |
C_target_gamma |
When computing coverage based richness ( |
... |
additional arguments that can be passed to |
BIODIVERSITY INDICES
N: total community abundance is the total number of individuals observed across all species in the sample
S: species richness is the observed number of species that occurs at least once in a sample
S_n: Rarefied species richness is the expected number of species,
given a defined number of sampled individuals (n) (Gotelli & Colwell 2001).
Rarefied richness at the alpha-scale is calculated for the values provided in
effort_samples
as long as these values are not smaller than the
user-defined minimum value effort_min
. In this case the minimum value
is used and samples with less individuals are discarded. When no values for
effort_samples
are provided the observed minimum number of individuals
of the samples is used, which is the standard in rarefaction analysis
(Gotelli & Colwell 2001). Because the number of individuals is expected to
scale linearly with sample area or effort, at the gamma-scale the number of
individuals for rarefaction is calculated as the minimum number of samples
within groups multiplied by effort_samples
. For example, when there
are 10
samples within each group, effort_groups
equals 10 *
effort_samples
. If n is larger than the number of individuals in sample and
extrapolate = TRUE
then the Chao1 (Chao 1984, 1987) method is used to
extrapolate the rarefaction curve.
pct_rare: Percent of rare species Is the ratio of the number of rare
species to the number of observed species x 100 (McGill 2011). Species are
considered rare in a particular sample if they have fewer individuals than
rare_thres * N
where rare_thres
can be set by the user and
N
is the total number of individuals in the sample. The default value
of rare_thres
of 0.05 is arbitrary and was chosen because McGill
(2011) found this metric of rarity performed well and was generally less
correlated with other common metrics of biodiversity. Essentially this metric
attempt to estimate what proportion of the species in the same occur in the
tail of the species abundance distribution and is therefore sensitive to
presence of rare species.
S_asymp: Asymptotic species richness is the expected number of
species given complete sampling and here it is calculated using the Chao1
estimator (Chao 1984, Chao 1987) see calc_chao1
. Note: this
metric is typically highly correlated with S (McGill 2011).
f_0: Undetected species richness is the number of undetected species
or the number of species observed 0 times which is an indicator of the degree
of rarity in the community. If there is a greater rarity then f_0 is expected
to increase. This metric is calculated as S_asymp - S
. This metric is
less correlated with S than the raw S_asymp
metric.
PIE: Probability of intraspecific encounter represents the probability that two randomly drawn individuals belong to the same species. Here we use the definition of Hurlbert (1971), which considers sampling without replacement. PIE is closely related to the well-known Simpson diversity index, but the latter assumes sampling with replacement.
S_PIE: Effective number of species for PIE represents the effective number of species derived from the PIE. It is calculated using the asymptotic estimator for Hill numbers of diversity order 2 (Chao et al. 2014). S_PIE represents the species richness of a hypothetical community with equally-abundant species and infinitely many individuals corresponding to the same value of PIE as the real community. An intuitive interpretation of S_PIE is that it corresponds to the number of dominant (highly abundant) species in the species pool.
For species richness S
, rarefied richness S_n
, undetected
richness f_0
, and the Effective Number of Species S_PIE
we also
calculate beta-diversity using multiplicative partitioning (Whittaker 1972,
Jost 2007). That means for these indices we estimate beta-diversity as the
ratio of gamma-diversity (total diversity across all plots) divided by
alpha-diversity (i.e., average plot diversity).
A data.frame
with four columns:
scale
... Group label for sites
index
... Name of the biodiversity index
sample_size
... The number of samples used to compute the
statistic, helpful for interpreting beta and gamma metrics.
effort
... Sampling effort for rarefied richness
(NA for the other indices)
gamma_coverage
... The coverage value for that particular
effort value on the gamma scale rarefaction curve. Will be NA
unless
coverage based richness (S_C
) and/or beta diversity is computed.
value
... Value of the biodiversity index
Felix May and Dan McGlinn
Chao, A. 1984. Nonparametric Estimation of the Number of Classes in a Population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 11:265–270.
Chao, A. 1987. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics, 43, 783-791.
Gotelli, N. J., and R. K. Colwell. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4:379–391.
Hurlbert, S. H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577–586.
Jost, L. 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88:2427–2439.
McGill, B. J. 2011. Species abundance distributions. Pages 105-122 Biological Diversity: Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment, eds. A.E. Magurran and B.J. McGill.
Whittaker, R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251.
data(tank_comm)
div_metrics <- calc_comm_div(tank_comm, 'S')
div_metrics
div_metrics <- calc_comm_div(tank_comm, 'S', avg_alpha = TRUE)
div_metrics
div_metrics <- calc_comm_div(tank_comm, 'S_n', effort = 10, avg_alpha = TRUE)
div_metrics
div_metrics <- calc_comm_div(tank_comm, 'S_C', C_target_gamma = 0.75, avg_alpha = TRUE)
div_metrics
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.