The gapAnalysisR library provides a series of functions that allows the user to evaluate the in situ and ex situ conservation status of a plant species in a standardized and reproducible way. This method will generate quantitative metrics and spatial outputs which represent the need for conservation and where gap in the collection/conservation of the species exist on the landscape.
The gapAnalysisR functions requires the user to provide two inputs A csv of species occurrences A tif of the predicted potential habit
This library consists of 16 functions. These are split between 4 categories; pre-analysis, insitu, exsitu, and combined assessment. The pre-analysis steps establishes the file structure and cleans the data. The in situ and ex situ fuctions produce the quantitative conservation assessments. The combined assessments summaries the data, conducts the EOO and AOO functions from the library redListR and generates a summary html which can be use to evaluate and compare outputs.
While each step of the process can be ran as a stand alone function the library is intended to be used following the example workflow provided below.
Examples of the application of the methods in a genus level study of Capsicum can be found here
As with any evaluation the quality and completeness of the data used in the assessment is the limiting factor to the overall usefulness of these metrics. A full description of the application of this process can be found here(link to the paper eventually)
? doesn't seems like there is a clean way to automate this in git hub markup... Might have to look into intext reference once structure is finalized. It will be important to have sense this is a rather larger readme
gapAnalysisR is currently in a testing phase. If you are interesting in using the product you can download the repo and source all the functions locally or use
At the current time the install_github process is having some issues loading selected libraries. A full list of libraries needed for the package is included below.
### this is not complete but I figure it is a reasonable placeholder for the time being. suppressMessages(require(tmap)) suppressMessages(require(raster)) suppressMessages(require(maptools)) suppressMessages(require(rgdal)) suppressMessages(require(ff)) suppressMessages(require(ffbase)) suppressMessages(require(sf)) suppressMessages(require(dplyr))
We recommend downloading the following example [dataset][ link to download]. This is data for four species of the Cucurbita genus. A full gap analysis for this species was performed in 2019 and can be viewed here.
The taxon name used as a reference to connect all inputs and outputs throughout the various steps in this process. The name of the taxon must be present for all rows in the csv. This name much also be present in the file name of the raster used to represent the potential suitable habitat of the species.
As you are transforming your own dataset please insure you are using the following parameters.
Coordinates: Decimal Degrees - unprojected WGS1984 Raster: unprojected WGS1984
Information on transforming your data to WGS1984 can be found here
CSV dataset of species occurrences and type. This process can handle single and multiple species.
taxon | longitude | latitude | type ------------ | ------------- | -------------| ------------- Cucurbita_cordata | -113.563 | 28.9457 | G Cucurbita_digitata | | | H
Taxon: this value will be the key for all functions in this library. Ensure it is consistent for all records and is included in the file name of your predicted potential habitat .tif as well.
Type: The type column refers to if the occurrence data represents a herbarium sample or a germplasm sample. Type H, for herbarium, is a known occurrence of the species in the landscape. Type G, for genebank, is a known occurrence of a species that has been collected and is stored as a living sample either in botanical gardens or genebanks.
This distinction is significant for multiple evaluations and effort must be taken to ensure the correct assignment of these values.
As of 2019, the major sources for Genebank occurrence data that the authors have evaluated include. USDA GRIN GENESYS WIEWS Generally, data from these sources would be considered a “G” type if it is still an active accession. Duplication between these source may exist.
Digital repositories such as GBIF, EDDmaps, and IDIGBIO, are most likely to contain observed locations of a species with no living sample. These would be considered “H” type occurrences. As these databases are not actively curated there is potential for duplicates between sources. Please evaluate this potential when gathering your data and assigning type.
Other independent sources of data need to be evaluated for type on a case by case basis.
More information and examples of how to make the distinction between “H” and “G” points can be found here.
tif of Predicted Potential Habitat
The raster representing the predicted potential extent of suitable habitat is used buy multiple functions to represent the maximum potential range of a species. The development of a high quality representation of a species potential habitat is a field of study in it’s own right. The importance here is that you trust the representativeness of the data you are inputting into this process.
Main_code - example of the recommend workflow.
Ex Situ Analysis - SRSex - ERSex - GRSex - FCSin - gapMapEx
In Situ Analysis - SRSin - ERSin - GRSin - FCSex - gapMapIn
summaryEvaluations - FCSmean - EOOandAOO - summaryDocument
While each function can be run as a stand alone method. The authors highly recommend following this workflow as it will ensure dependencies for individual functions are in place and that the folders are stored in the correct location to successfully produce the final summary document.
workplace | userData* | | occurenceData | | rasters |_gapAnalysis | species1 | | version | | | gapAnalysis_outputs | | | | exsitu | | | | instu | | | | combined | | | redlist | | summaryDocuments | species2 | version | | gapAnalysis_outputs | | | exsitu | | | instu | | | combined | | redlist |_ summaryDocuments
The user needs to provide the occurrence data and rasters. All other files will be generated by following the provided workflow.
The pre analysis steps are preform across all unique species at once. The steps are required to generate the data and file structure that will be used in the following gap analysis functions.
Create_folder_structure Relative path names are used in all the in situ and ex situ conservation metrics. This fucntion established those path to ensure consistency through the following processes.
generateCounts This function produces counts of species occurrences based on the type(G or H), presence of quality latitude and longitude values, and combinations of those qualities. The code generate a counts.csv which is used in subsequent gap analysis functions.
Create_buffers This function buffer all know "G" occurrences and mask those buffers to the area within a the predicted potential suitable habitat provided by the user. The output of this process is a raster layer that is used in multiple gap analysis metrics.
The ex situ analysis evaluates the extent to which a species is preserved in the genebanks and botanical gardens of the world. These living samples represent long term storage of the plant outside of the species native habitat. Ex situ conservation is an important process for ensuring the conservation of a species as native habitat is directly effected by landscape and ecological changes. Additionally, many genebanks distribute seeds to the scientific research community, as a result samples that have been conserved ex situ are more likely to be represented in the ongoing research of the species.
For the purpose of this library all occurrences that are representative of living samples stored in genebanks or botanical gardens are denotes as Type:”G” —G stands for germplasm.
SRSex The sampling representativeness score ex situ measure the relationship between the number of germplasm accessions(G) verses the total number of reference records (H). Which would indication that when a species is being observed in is natural landscape, seed is also being collected and preserved in the genebank system. Unlike all other metrics, SRSex takes into account all records, even those that do not have latitude and longitude values.
(total number of G accession)/(total number of H accession) * 100
An ideal SRSex of one would imply that germplasm collection is occurring at the same rate as the location of a given species is being defined.
GRSex The geographic representativeness score ex situ calculates the proportion of the predicted potential habit that falls will 50 km of a G occurrence over the total area of the predicted potential habitat. The buffer distance implies that an accession of a species is representative of the genetic character of the population of the species within a that buffered area. The assumption maybe be more or less true for different species and the buffer distance can be altered in the main_code.r script. We recommend only changing this value if you have species specific information to do so.
(area within 50km of G points, masked to known potential habitat) / ( total area of predicted potential habitat) * 100
An ideal GRSex score of 100 implies that all of the predicted potential habitat of a species is found within 50 km of a G occurrence.
ERSex The ecological representativeness score ex situ compares the number of distinct ecoregions within the predicted range of a species against the number of ecoregions which have G accessions collected from within them.
(number of ecoregions from which a G accessions has been collected) / (number of ecoregions present in the potential predicted habitat ) * 100
An ideal ERSex of 100 would imply that all ecoregions present in the species habitat have at least one G occurrence collected from within it.
FCSex Compiles the SRSex,GRSex, and ERSex into a single metric by averaging all three values.
GapMapEx A spatial representation of the GRSex metric created by masking the predicted potential habitat against the buffers of the G occurrences. The resulting maps shows areas that could have the species present on the landscape and have yet to have any germplasm samples collected from the region.
The in situ conservation assessment evaluated how well protected a species native habitat is. The World Database of Protected Areas(WDPA)(IUCN,2019) is used to determine areas which are designated, inscribed or established protected areas.
SRSin The sampling representativeness score in situ calculated the proportion of occurrences that fall within protected areas compared to occurences outside of protected areas.
(Number of occurrences inside protected areas) / (Total number of occurrences) * 100
An ideal SRS score of 100 would imply that all known occurrences of a species are within a protected area.
GRSin The geographic representativeness in situ score calculates the proportion of the predicted suitable habitat that falls within protected areas.
(area of predicted habitat within protected areas) / (area of predicted habitat) * 100
An idea GRSin score of 100 would imply the entirety of the species predicted habitat occurs within a protected area.
ERSin The ecological representativeness score in situ calculates the proportion of ecoregions that contain a protected area. Only ecoregions in which a known occurrence is found area included in this assessment.
(number of ecoregions that contain a protected area) / (number of ecoregions in which a known occurrence of the species is found) * 100
An ideal ERSin score of 100 would imply that there is at least 1 protected area in all the ecoregions in which this species is know to exist.
FCSin Compiles the SRSin, GRSin, and ERSin into a single metric by taking the mean of all three values.
GapMapIn A spatial representation of the GRSin metric is created by masking the predicted potential habitat of the species by the WDPA raster. The output shows areas of the potential distribution that are not currently within designated, inscribed or established protected areas.
FCS-mean Complies the FCSex and FCSin into a single metric by taking the mean of the
EOOandAOO The Extent of Occurrence (EOO) and Area of Occurrence functions from the library redlistR[https://github.com/red-list-ecosystem/redlistr] are include as part of the gap analysis method as the represent an additional standard for accessing the conservation status of a species. These metrics are used as part of the process for defining the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species.
Unlike many of the gapAnalysisR functions the EOO and AOO metrics generally more sensitive to the spatial extent represented by the occurrences data. For example; if all the occurrences of a given species are found within a single protected area, the in situ metric gap analysis metrics would be very high, but the EOO and AOO metrics would be low. The balance between these evaluations methods should hopefully provide a more complete quantification of a species conservation status.
speciesSummary As long as there are no major deviations from the established file structure the speciesSummary function calls a Rmarkdown file that compiles the results of all above metrics into a single interactive html document that can be shared and opened directly via a web browser. This user friendly format should help your own evaluations and assessments and allow you to share your work with colleagues.
Main: Daniel Carver, Chrystian C. Sosa Other contributors: Julian Ramirez-Villegas, Colin K. Khoury, Harold A. Achicanoy, Maria Victoria Diaz, Steven Sotelo, Nora P. Castaneda-Alvarez
Castañeda-Álvarez NP, Khoury CK, Achicanoy HA, Bernau V, Dempewolf H, Eastwood RJ, Guarino L, Harker RH, Jarvis A, Maxted N, Mueller JV, Ramírez-Villegas J, Sosa CC, Struik PC, Vincent H, and Toll J (2016) Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives. Nature Plants 2(4): 16022. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.22
Khoury CK, Carver D, Kates HR, Achicanoy HA, van Zonneweld M, Thomas E, Heinitz C, Jarret R, Labate JA, Reitsma K, Nabhan GP, and Greene SL (2019) Distributions, conservation status, and abiotic stress tolerance potential of wild cucurbits (Cucurbita L.). Plants, People, Planet. Accepted
Khoury CK, Carver D, Barchenger DW, Barboza G, van Zonneweld M, Jarret R, Bohs L, Kantar MB, Uchanski M, Mercer K, Nabhan GP, Bosland PW, and Greene SL (2019) Modeled distributions and conservation status of the wild relatives of chile peppers (Capsicum L). Diversity and Distributions. Doi: 10.1111/DDI.13008. Accepted
Khoury CK, Amariles D, Soto JS, Diaz MV, Sotelo S, Sosa CC, Ramírez-Villegas J, Achicanoy HA, Velásquez-Tibatá J, Guarino L, León B, Navarro-Racines C, Castañeda-Álvarez NP, Dempewolf H, Wiersema JH, and Jarvis A (2019) Comprehensiveness of conservation of useful wild plants: an operational indicator for biodiversity and sustainable development targets. Ecological Indicators 98: 420-429. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.016
Khoury CK, Amariles D, Soto JS, Diaz MV, Sotelo S, Sosa CC, Ramírez-Villegas J, Achicanoy HA, Castañeda-Álvarez NP, León B, and Wiersema JH (2019) Data for the calculation of an indicator of the comprehensiveness of conservation of useful wild plants. Data in Brief 22: 90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.125
Khoury CK, Castañeda-Álvarez NP, Achicanoy HA, Sosa CC, Bernau V, Kassa MT, Norton SL, van der Maesen LJG, Upadhyaya HD, Ramírez-Villegas J, Jarvis A, and Struik PC (2015) Crop wild relatives of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]: distributions, ex situ conservation status, and potential genetic resources for abiotic stress tolerance. Biological Conservation 184: 259-270. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.032.
Khoury CK, Heider B, Castañeda-Álvarez NP, Achicanoy HA, Sosa CC, Miller RE, Scotland RW, Wood JRI, Rossel G, Eserman LA, Jarret RL, Yencho GC, Bernau V, Juarez H, Sotelo S, de Haan S, and Struik PC (2015) Distributions, ex situ conservation priorities, and genetic resource potential of crop wild relatives of sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., I. series Batatas]. Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 251.
Mezghani N, Khoury CK, Carver D, Achicanoy HA, Simon P, Martínez Flores F, and Spooner D (2019) Distributions and Conservation Status of Carrot Wild Relatives in Tunisia: A Case Study in the Western Mediterranean Basin. Crop Science 59(6): 1–12. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2019.05.0333.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.