all_times <- list() # store the time for each chunk knitr::knit_hooks$set(time_it = local({ now <- NULL function(before, options) { if (before) { now <<- Sys.time() } else { res <- difftime(Sys.time(), now, units = "secs") all_times[[options$label]] <<- res } } })) knitr::opts_chunk$set( tidy = TRUE, tidy.opts = list(width.cutoff = 95), fig.width = 10, message = FALSE, warning = FALSE, time_it = TRUE, error = TRUE )
Integration of single-cell sequencing datasets, for example across experimental batches, donors, or conditions, is often an important step in scRNA-seq workflows. Integrative analysis can help to match shared cell types and states across datasets, which can boost statistical power, and most importantly, facilitate accurate comparative analysis across datasets. In previous versions of Seurat we introduced methods for integrative analysis, including our ‘anchor-based’ integration workflow. Many labs have also published powerful and pioneering methods, including Harmony and scVI, for integrative analysis. Please see our Integrating scRNA-seq data with multiple tools vignette.
The following tutorial is designed to give you an overview of the kinds of comparative analyses on complex cell types that are possible using the Seurat integration procedure. Here, we address a few key goals:
For convenience, we distribute this dataset through our SeuratData package.
options(SeuratData.repo.use = "http://seurat.nygenome.org")
library(Seurat) library(SeuratData) library(patchwork)
# install dataset InstallData('ifnb')
The object contains data from human PBMC from two conditions, interferon-stimulated and control cells (stored in the stim
column in the object metadata). We will aim to integrate the two conditions together, so that we can jointly identify cell subpopulations across datasets, and then explore how each group differs across conditions
In previous versions of Seurat, we would require the data to be represented as two different Seurat objects. In Seurat v5, we keep all the data in one object, but simply split it into multiple 'layers'. To learn more about layers, check out our Seurat object interaction vignette.
# load dataset ifnb <- LoadData('ifnb') # split the RNA measurements into two layers # one for control cells, one for stimulated cells ifnb[["RNA"]] <- split(ifnb[["RNA"]], f = ifnb$stim) ifnb
We can first analyze the dataset without integration. The resulting clusters are defined both by cell type and stimulation condition, which creates challenges for downstream analysis.
# run standard anlaysis workflow ifnb <- NormalizeData(ifnb) ifnb <- FindVariableFeatures(ifnb) ifnb <- ScaleData(ifnb) ifnb <- RunPCA(ifnb)
ifnb <- FindNeighbors(ifnb, dims=1:30, reduction = 'pca') ifnb <- FindClusters(ifnb, resolution = 2, cluster.name = "unintegrated_clusters") ifnb <- RunUMAP(ifnb, dims = 1:30, reduction = 'pca', reduction.name = 'umap.unintegrated') DimPlot(ifnb, reduction = 'umap.unintegrated', group.by=c('stim','seurat_clusters'))
We now aim to integrate data from the two conditions, so that cells from the same cell type/subpopulation will cluster together.
We often refer to this procedure as intergration/alignment. When aligning two genome sequences together, identification of shared/homologous regions can help to interpret differences between the sequences as well. Similarly for scRNA-seq integration, our goal is not to remove biological differences across conditions, but to learn shared cell types/states in an initial step - specifically because that will enable us to compare control stimulated and control profiles for these individual cell types.
The Seurat v5 integration procedure aims to return a single dimensional reduction that captures the shared sources of variance across multiple layers, so that cells in a similar biological state will cluster. The method returns a dimensional reduction (i.e. integrated.cca
) which can be used for visualization and unsupervised clustering analysis. For evaluating performance, we can use cell type labels that are pre-loaded in the seurat_annotations
metadata column.
ifnb <- IntegrateLayers( object = ifnb, method = CCAIntegration, orig.reduction = "pca", new.reduction = 'integrated.cca', verbose = FALSE) # re-join layers after integration ifnb[["RNA"]] <- JoinLayers(ifnb[["RNA"]]) ifnb <- FindNeighbors(ifnb, reduction = "integrated.cca", dims = 1:30) ifnb <- FindClusters(ifnb, resolution = 1) ifnb <- RunUMAP(ifnb,dims = 1:30,reduction = 'integrated.cca')
# Visualization DimPlot(ifnb, reduction = 'umap', group.by=c('stim','seurat_annotations'))
To visualize the two conditions side-by-side, we can use the split.by
argument to show each condition colored by cluster.
DimPlot(ifnb, reduction = "umap", split.by = "stim")
To identify canonical cell type marker genes that are conserved across conditions, we provide the FindConservedMarkers()
function. This function performs differential gene expression testing for each dataset/group and combines the p-values using meta-analysis methods from the MetaDE R package. For example, we can calculated the genes that are conserved markers irrespective of stimulation condition in cluster 6 (NK cells).
Idents(ifnb) <- "seurat_annotations" nk.markers <- FindConservedMarkers(ifnb, ident.1 = "NK", grouping.var = "stim", verbose = FALSE) head(nk.markers)
You can perform these same analysis on the unsupervised clustering results (stored in seurat_clusters
), and use these conserved markers to annotate cell types in your dataset.
The DotPlot()
function with the split.by
parameter can be useful for viewing conserved cell type markers across conditions, showing both the expression level and the percentage of cells in a cluster expressing any given gene. Here we plot 2-3 strong marker genes for each of our 14 clusters.
#NEEDS TO BE FIXED AND SET ORDER CORRECTLY Idents(ifnb) <- factor( Idents(ifnb), levels = c("pDC", "Eryth","Mk", "DC", "CD14 Mono", "CD16 Mono", "B Activated", "B", "CD8 T", "NK", "T activated", "CD4 Naive T", "CD4 Memory T")) markers.to.plot <- c("CD3D","CREM","HSPH1","SELL","GIMAP5","CACYBP","GNLY","NKG7","CCL5","CD8A","MS4A1","CD79A","MIR155HG","NME1","FCGR3A","VMO1","CCL2","S100A9","HLA-DQA1","GPR183","PPBP","GNG11","HBA2","HBB","TSPAN13","IL3RA","IGJ","PRSS57") DotPlot(ifnb, features = markers.to.plot, cols = c('blue', 'red'), dot.scale = 8, split.by = "stim") + RotatedAxis()
Now that we've aligned the stimulated and control cells, we can start to do comparative analyses and look at the differences induced by stimulation.
We can aggregate cells of a similar type and condition together to create "pseudobulk" profiles using the AggregateExpression
command. As an initial exploratory analysis, we can compare pseudobulk profiles of two cell types (naive CD4 T cells, and CD14 monocytes), and compare their gene expression profiles before and after stimulation. We highlight genes that exhibit dramatic responses to interferon stimulation. As you can see, many of the same genes are upregulated in both of these cell types and likely represent a conserved interferon response pathway, though CD14 monocytes exhibit a stronger transcriptional response.
library(ggplot2) library(cowplot) theme_set(theme_cowplot()) aggregate_ifnb <- AggregateExpression(ifnb,group.by = c("seurat_annotations","stim"),return.seurat = TRUE) genes.to.label = c("ISG15", "LY6E", "IFI6", "ISG20", "MX1", "IFIT2", "IFIT1", "CXCL10", "CCL8") p1 <- CellScatter(aggregate_ifnb, "CD14 Mono_CTRL","CD14 Mono_STIM",highlight = genes.to.label) p2 <- LabelPoints(plot = p1, points = genes.to.label, repel = TRUE) p3 <- CellScatter(aggregate_ifnb, "CD4 Naive T_CTRL","CD4 Naive T_STIM",highlight = genes.to.label) p4 <- LabelPoints(plot = p3, points = genes.to.label, repel = TRUE) p2 + p4
We can now ask what genes change in different conditions for cells of the same type. First, we create a column in the meta.data slot to hold both the cell type and stimulation information and switch the current ident to that column. Then we use FindMarkers()
to find the genes that are different between stimulated and control B cells. Notice that many of the top genes that show up here are the same as the ones we plotted earlier as core interferon response genes. Additionally, genes like CXCL10 which we saw were specific to monocyte and B cell interferon response show up as highly significant in this list as well.
Please note that p-values obtained from this analysis should be interpreted with caution, as these tests treat each cell as an independent replicate, and ignore inherent correlations between cells originating from the same sample. As discussed here, DE tests across multiple conditions should expressly utilize multiple samples/replicates, and can be performed after aggregating ('pseudobulking') cells from the same sample and subpopulation together. We do not perform this analysis here, as there is a single replicate in the data, but please see our vignette comparing healthy and diabetic samples as an example for how to perform DE analysis across conditions.
ifnb$celltype.stim <- paste(ifnb$seurat_annotations, ifnb$stim, sep = "_") Idents(ifnb) <- "celltype.stim" b.interferon.response <- FindMarkers(ifnb, ident.1 = "B_STIM", ident.2 = "B_CTRL", verbose = FALSE) head(b.interferon.response, n = 15)
Another useful way to visualize these changes in gene expression is with the split.by
option to the FeaturePlot()
or VlnPlot()
function. This will display FeaturePlots of the list of given genes, split by a grouping variable (stimulation condition here). Genes such as CD3D and GNLY are canonical cell type markers (for T cells and NK/CD8 T cells) that are virtually unaffected by interferon stimulation and display similar gene expression patterns in the control and stimulated group. IFI6 and ISG15, on the other hand, are core interferon response genes and are upregulated accordingly in all cell types. Finally, CD14 and CXCL10 are genes that show a cell type specific interferon response. CD14 expression decreases after stimulation in CD14 monocytes, which could lead to misclassification in a supervised analysis framework, underscoring the value of integrated analysis. CXCL10 shows a distinct upregulation in monocytes and B cells after interferon stimulation but not in other cell types.
FeaturePlot(ifnb, features = c("CD3D", "GNLY", "IFI6"), split.by = "stim", max.cutoff = 3, cols = c("grey", "red"), reduction='umap')
plots <- VlnPlot(ifnb, features = c("LYZ", "ISG15", "CXCL10"), split.by = "stim", group.by = "seurat_annotations", pt.size = 0, combine = FALSE) wrap_plots(plots = plots, ncol = 1)
As an alternative to log-normalization, Seurat also includes support for preprocessing of scRNA-seq using the sctransform workflow. The IntegrateLayers
function also supports SCTransform-normalized data, by setting the normalization.method
parameter, as shown below.
ifnb <- LoadData('ifnb') # split datasets and process without integration ifnb[["RNA"]] <- split(ifnb[["RNA"]], f=ifnb$stim) ifnb <- SCTransform(ifnb) ifnb <- RunPCA(ifnb) ifnb <- RunUMAP(ifnb,dims = 1:30) DimPlot(ifnb,reduction = 'umap',group.by = c("stim","seurat_annotations")) # integrate datasets ifnb <- IntegrateLayers(object = ifnb, method = CCAIntegration, normalization.method="SCT", verbose = F) ifnb <- FindNeighbors(ifnb,reduction = 'integrated.dr',dims = 1:30) ifnb <- FindClusters(ifnb,resolution = 0.6) ifnb <- RunUMAP(ifnb,dims = 1:30,reduction = 'integrated.dr') DimPlot(ifnb,reduction = 'umap',group.by = c("stim","seurat_annotations")) # perform differential expression ifnb <- PrepSCTFindMarkers(ifnb) ifnb$celltype.stim <- paste(ifnb$seurat_annotations, ifnb$stim, sep = "_") Idents(ifnb) <- 'celltype.stim' b.interferon.response <- FindMarkers(ifnb, ident.1 = "B_STIM", ident.2 = "B_CTRL", verbose = FALSE)
<details> <summary>**Session Info**</summary> ```r sessionInfo()
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.