conversation | R Documentation |
Data from an experiment performed on American college students. Students were observed conversing for 10 minutes and summary data was recorded of the conversational dynamics. Pictures of the students were then rated by observers for personality characteristics. The Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale is used to assess subclinical psychopathy of the students, and the students were also subjected to a prisoners' dilemma.
conversation
A data frame with 210 observations of 28 variables. Descriptions of some variables are from the authors.
1 = female; 0 = male
individual 1's standardized score on factor 1 of LSRP
individual 1's standardized score on factor 2 of LSRP
individual 1's standardized score on full LSRP
individual 1's facial attractiveness, standardized (M = 0, SD = 1) separately for males and females
student rating of fighting ability from pictures
student rating of strength from pictures
standardized height score - standardization separate for each gender
in childhood zip code, in 1000s USD (individual 1)
Not described in paper
Not described in paper
perceived prestige of self-reported academic major
Not described in paper
an individual’s proportion of the triad’s words uttered
proportion of the triad’s sequence starts performed, hereafter proportion of sequence starts (sequential dominance)
interruptions performed per transcribed minute (participatory dominance)
sequence starts per word produced times 100
interruptions performed per word produced times 100
frequency of affect words as described by the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) 2007 program dictionary
id of individual 1
id of individual 2
1 = facing the camera; 0 = not facing the camera (individual 1) during prisoner's dilemma
interruptions by individual 1 of individual 2 per minute of transcribed conversation
interruptions by individual 2 of individual 1 per minute of transcribed conversation
Individual 1 decision toward individual 2 in PDG; 1 = individual 1 cooperates toward individual 2 in Prisoner's Dilemma; 0 = individual 1 defects toward individual 2
Individual 2 decision toward individual 1 in PDG; 1 = individual 2 cooperates toward individual 1 in Prisoner's Dilemma: 0 = individual 2 defects toward individual 1
1 = individual 1 predicts that individual 2 cooperates toward individual 1; 0 = individual 1 predicts that individual 2 defects toward individual 1
1 = individual 2 predicts that individual 1 cooperates toward individual 2; 0 = individual 2 predicts that individual 1 defects toward individual 2
This data is the combination of the data sets from two papers. For ease of use in classroom setting, median_income was imputed for students with missing data. This imputation is strictly for pedagogy.
From the authors: "The determinants of conversational dominance are not well understood. We used videotaped triadic interactions among unacquainted same-sex American college students to test predictions drawn from the theoretical distinction between dominance and prestige as modes of human status competition."
From the authors' second paper: "Recent evidence suggests that psychopathy is a trait continuum. To test this, we focus on a ubiquitous real-life source of conditional behaviour: the expected relational value of social partners, both in terms of their quality and the likely quantity of future interactions with them."
Manson JH, Gervais MM, Fessler DMT, Kline MA (2014) Subclinical Primary Psychopathy, but Not Physical Formidability or Attractiveness, Predicts Conversational Dominance in a Zero-Acquaintance Situation. PLoS ONE 9(11): e113135.
Gervais Matthew M., Kline Michelle, Ludmer Mara, George Rachel and Manson Joseph H. 2013The strategy of psychopathy: primary psychopathic traits predict defection on low-value relationshipsProc. R. Soc. B.28020122773
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.