sbchoice: Parametric approach to analyze single-bounded dichotomous...

In DCchoice: Analyzing Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data

Description

This function analyzes single-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation (CV) data on the basis of the utility difference approach.

Usage

sbchoice(formula, data, subset, na.action = na.omit, 
         dist = "log-logistic", ...)

## S3 method for class 'sbchoice'
print(x, digits = max(3, getOption("digits") - 1), ...)

## S3 method for class 'sbchoice'
vcov(object, ...)

## S3 method for class 'sbchoice'
logLik(object, ...)

Arguments

formula	an S3 class object "formula" and specifies the model structure.
data	a data frame containing the variables in the model formula.
subset	an optional vector specifying a subset of observations.
na.action	a function which indicates what should happen when the data contains NAs.
dist	a character string setting the error distribution in the model, which takes one of "logistic", "normal", "log-logistic", "log-normal" or "weibull".
x	an object of class "sbchoice".
digits	a number of digits to display.
object	an object of class "dbchoice".
...	optional arguments. Currently not in use.

Details

The function sbchoice() implements an analysis of single-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation (CV) data on the basis of the utility difference approach (Hanemann, 1984).

The extractor function summary() is available for a "sbchoice" class object. See
summary.sbchoice for details.

There are two functions available for computing the confidence intervals for the estimates of WTPs. krCI implements simulations to construct empirical distributions of the WTP while bootCI carries out nonparametric bootstrapping.

Most of the details of sbchoice() is the same as those of dbchoice(), a double-bounded analogue of sbchoice. See the section Details in dbchoice. Differences between the two functions are as follows:

• In the model formula, the first part contains only one response variable (e.g., R1) and the third part contains only one bid variable (e.g., BD1) because respondents are requested to answer a CV question in the single-bounded dichotomous choice CV. The following is a typical structure of the formula:
  R1 ~ (the names of the covariates) | BD1

• The function sbchoice() analyzes the responses to single-bounded dichotomous choice CV questions internally using the function glm() with the argument
  family = binomial(link = "logit")
  or
  family = binomial(link = "probit").
  When dist = "weibull", optimization is carried out using the optim() function with a hard-coded log-likelihood function.

• Outputs from sbchoice() are slightly different from those from dbchoice() because the analysis in sbchoice() internally depends on the function glm() for the (log-) normal or (log-) logistic distributions. (see the Value section).

Nonparametric analysis of single-bounded dichotomous choice data can be done by turnbull.sb or by kristrom.

Value

This function returns an object of S3 class "sbchoice" that is a list with the following components.

coefficients	a named vector of estimated coefficients.
call	the matched call.
formula	the formula supplied.
glm.out	a list of components returned from glm() with the data set and the formula. In case of the Weibull distribution, a list of components from the optim() is saved.
glm.null	a list of components returned from glm() with the data set and a formula containing only constant (null model). In case of the Weibull distribution, a list of components from the optim() is saved.
distribution	a character string showing the error distribution used.
nobs	a number of observations.
covariates	a named matrix of the covariates used in the model.
bid	a named matrix of the bids used in the model.
yn	a named matrix of the responses to the CV question used in the model.
data.name	the data matrix.
terms	terms
contrast	contrasts used for factors
xlevels	levels used for factors

References

Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann M, Hanley N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, \"Ozdemiro\=glu E, Pearce DW, Sugden R, Swanson J (eds.) (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Edward Elger, Cheltenham, UK.

Boyle KJ, Welsh MP, Bishop RC (1988). “Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: Comment.” Land Economics, 64(1), 94–98.

Carson RT, Hanemann WM (2005). “Contingent Valuation.” in KG M\"aler, JR Vincent (eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics. Elsevier, New York.

Croissant Y (2011). Ecdat: Data Sets for Econometrics, R package version 0.1-6.1, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Ecdat.

Hanemann, WM (1984). “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(2), 332–341.

Hanemann M, Kanninen B (1999). “The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response CV Data.”, in IJ Bateman, KG Willis (eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Methods in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, 302–441. Oxford University Press, New York.

See Also

summary.sbchoice, krCI, bootCI, NaturalPark, turnbull.sb, kristrom glm, formula dbchoice

Examples

## Examples for sbchoice() are also based on a data set NaturalPark 
## in the package Ecdat (Croissant 2011): so see the section Examples 
## in the dbchoice() for details.
data(NaturalPark, package = "Ecdat")

## The variable answers are converted into a format that is suitable for 
## the function sbchoice() as follows:
NaturalPark$R1 <- ifelse(substr(NaturalPark$answers, 1, 1) == "y", 1, 0)
NaturalPark$R2 <- ifelse(substr(NaturalPark$answers, 2, 2) == "y", 1, 0)


## We assume that the error distribution in the model is a log-logistic; 
## therefore, the bid variables bid1 is converted into LBD1 as follows:
NaturalPark$LBD1 <- log(NaturalPark$bid1)

## The utility difference function is assumed to contain covariates 
## (sex, age, and income) as well as the bid variable (LBD1) as follows 
## (R2 is not used because of single-bounded dichotomous choice CV format):
fmsb <- R1 ~ sex + age + income | LBD1

## Not run: 
## The formula may be alternatively defined as
fmsb <- R1 ~ sex + age + income | log(bid1)

## End(Not run)

## The function sbchoice() with the function fmsb and the data frame NP 
## is executed as follows:
NPsb <- sbchoice(fmsb, data = NaturalPark)
NPsb
NPsbs <- summary(NPsb)
NPsbs

## Not run: 
## Generic functions such as summary() and coefficients() work for glm.out
summary(NPsb$glm.out)
coefficients(NPsb$glm.out)

## The confidence intervals for these WTPs are calculated using the 
## function krCI() or bootCI() as follows:
krCI(NPsb)
bootCI(NPsb)
## The WTP of a female with age = 5 and income = 3 is calculated
## using function krCI() or bootCI() as follows:
krCI(NPsb, individual = data.frame(sex = "female", age = 5, income = 3))
bootCI(NPsb, individual = data.frame(sex = "female", age = 5, income = 3))

## End(Not run)

## The variable age and income are deleted from the fitted model, 
## and the updated model is fitted as follows:
update(NPsb, .~. - age - income |.)

## Respondents' utility and probability of choosing Yes under 
## the fitted model and original data are predicted as follows: 
head(predict(NPsb, type = "utility"))
head(predict(NPsb, type = "probability"))
## Utility and probability of choosing Yes for a female with age = 5 
## and income = 3 under bid = 10 are predicted as follows:
predict(NPsb, type = "utility",
    newdata = data.frame(sex = "female", age = 5, income = 3, LBD1 = log(10)))
predict(NPsb, type = "probability",
    newdata = data.frame(sex = "female", age = 5, income = 3, LBD1 = log(10)))

## Plot of probabilities of choosing yes is drawn as drawn as follows:
plot(NPsb)
## The range of bid can be limited (e.g., [log(10), log(20)]):
plot(NPsb, bid = c(log(10), log(20)))

DCchoice documentation built on May 2, 2019, 4:44 p.m.